Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valuing Changes in the Quality of Coral Reef Ecosystems: A Stated Preference Study of SCUBA Diving in the Bonaire National Marine Park

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We estimated the economic value of changes in the quality of a coral reef ecosystem to SCUBA divers in the Caribbean using a stated preference mail survey. Our sampling frame was all divers with U.S. home addresses who purchased a tag required for diving in the Bonaire National Marine Park in 2001. Divers were asked how they might have altered their trip choice had the quality of the coral reef system been different from what they experienced. From these responses we inferred the value of three different levels of quality defined by visibility, species diversity, and percent coral cover. We used random utility theory and mixed logit to analyze the choice questions. Our sample size was 211, and our survey response rate was 75%. For modest changes in quality we estimated per person annual losses at $45. For larger losses the value was $192.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz W, Boxall PC, Louviere JL, Swait J and Williams M (1999). State preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. In: Bateman, IJ and Willis, KG (eds) Valuing environmental preferences, Oxford Press, Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison GW, Lubchenco J and Carr MH (1998). Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecol Appl 8(1S): S79–S92

    Google Scholar 

  • Arin T and Kramer RA (2002). Divers’ willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: an exploratory study. Ocean Coast Manage 45: 171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champ P (2003). Collecting survey data for non-market valuation. In: Champ, P, Boyle, K and Brown, T (eds) A primer for nonmarket valuation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2007). Mail and internet surveys. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA, van’t Hof T and Scura LF (1993). Meeting ecological and economic goals: marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio 22(203): 117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA, Scura LF and van’t Hof T (2000). An economic and ecological analysis of the Bonaire Marine Park. In: Cesar, HSJ (eds) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs, pp 242. Kalmar Sweden, Cordio

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann WM (1999) Welfare analysis with discrete choice models. In: Herriges JA, Kling CA (eds) Valuing recreation and the environment: revealed preference methods in theory and practice

  • Holmes TP and Adamowicz WL (2003). Attribute-based methods. In: Champ, P, Boyle, K and Brown, T (eds) A primer for nonmarket valuation, pp. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey G and Holmes A (2002). Tourist support for marine protection in Nha Trang, Viet Nam. J Environ Plann Manage 45(4): 461–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher D and Swait J (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu LF, Langford IH and Kenyon W (2003). Valuing marine parks in a developing county: a case study of the Seychelles. Environ Devel Econ 8: 373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg F and Folke C (1999). Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol Econ 29: 215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton LH (1995). Valuing coral reef protection. Ocean Coast Manage 26(2): 119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash CL (2000). Assessing the benefits of improving coral reef biodiversity: the contingent valuation method. In: Cesar, HSJ (eds) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs, pp 242. Kalmar, Cordio

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon JPG (1992). The economic valuation of coral reefs. Mar Pollut Bull 24(11): 529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongson E and Dygico M (2004). User fee system for marine ecotourism: the Tubbataha Reef experience. Coast Manage 32: 17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Train K and Weeks M (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness to pay space. In: Alberini, A and Scarpa, R (eds) Applications of simulation methods in environmental resource economics, Springer & Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Train K, Wilson W (2007) Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices. Transport Res B, forthcoming

  • Wielgus J, Chadwick-Furman N, Zeitouni N and Shechter M (2003). Effects of coral reef attribute damage on recreational welfare. Mar Res Econ 18: 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C (2000). Status of coral reefs of the world: 2000. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Cape Ferguson Queensland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George R. Parsons.

Additional information

Presented at the 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists in Kyoto, Japan, July 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsons, G.R., Thur, S.M. Valuing Changes in the Quality of Coral Reef Ecosystems: A Stated Preference Study of SCUBA Diving in the Bonaire National Marine Park. Environ Resource Econ 40, 593–608 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9171-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9171-y

keywords

Navigation