Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Reporting and Private Enforcement in Environmental Regulation

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-reporting of compliance status has become a common feature in the enforcement of environmental regulation. In this paper, I generalize existing models of enforcement with self-reporting to include the possibility of private enforcement of regulation through citizen suits. This allows me to identify an additional argument for the efficiency of self-reporting: it can increase the likelihood of a successful suit and thus facilitate private enforcement of regulation. Specifically, if self-reporting sufficiently increases the expected penalty for losing a citizen suit, if the costs of private enforcement are low, and if inspection costs are high enough relative to enforcement costs, self-reporting lowers expected regulatory and social costs by allowing the regulator to rely on private enforcement and decrease his enforcement efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

SR:

Self-reporting

References

  • Adler JH (2001). Stand or deliver: citizen suits, standing and environmental protection. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 12: 39–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Baik KH and Shogren JF (1994). Environmental conflicts with reimbursement for citizen suits. J Environ Econ Manage 27: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bester H and Strauz R (2000). Imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: the multi-agent case. Econ Lett 69: 165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadil A (1985). Citizen suits against polluters: picking up the pace. Harvard Environ Law Rev 9: 23–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ and Hart OD (1983). An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51: 7–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford J (1987). Self-reporting of pollution and the firm’s behavior under imperfectly enforceable regulations. J Environ Econ Manage 14: 293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington W (1988). Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. J Public Econ 37: 29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes AG (1997). Environmental regulation by private contest. J Public Econ 63: 407–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes AG and Rickman N (1999). Regulatory dealing—revisiting the Harrington Paradox. J Public Econ 72: 361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley TM and Shogren JF (1997). Environmental conflicts and the SLAPP. J Environ Econ Manage 33: 253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes R (1999). Remediation and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement. J Public Econ 72: 379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes R (2000). Self-reporting in optimal law enforcement when violators have heterogeneous probabilities of apprehension. J Legal Stud 24: 287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes R (2001). Violator avoidance activities and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement. J Law Econ Organ 17: 239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow L (1986). Private versus social costs in bringing suit. J Legal Stud 15: 371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow L and Shavell S (1994). Optimal law enforcement with self-reporting of behavior. J Polit Econ 102: 583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langpap C (2007). Pollution abatement with limited enforcement power and citizen suits. J Regul Econ 31: 57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livernois J and McKenna CJ (1999). Truth or consequences. Enforcing pollution standards with self-reporting. J Public Econ 71: 415–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane R and Terry L (1997). Citizen suits: impacts on permitting and agency enforcement. Nat Resour Environ 11: 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik AS (1993). Self-reporting and the design of policies for regulating stochastic pollution. J Environ Econ Manage 24: 241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D and Png IPL (1994). Marginal deterrence in enforcement of law. J Polit Econ 102: 1039–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero JP (2002). Prices versus quantities with incomplete enforcement. J Public Econ 85: 435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47: 61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naysnerski W and Tietenberg T (1992). Private enforcement of federal environmental law. Land Econ 68: 28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell CS (1990) Monitoring and enforcement. In: Portney P (ed) Public policies for environmental protection. Resources for the Future

  • Settle C, Hurley TM, Shogren JF (2001) Citizen suits. In: Heyes AG (ed) The law and economics of the environment. Edward Elgar

  • Shavell S (1982). Suit, settlement and trial: a theoretical analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal costs. J Legal Stud 11: 55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1997). The fundamental divergence between the private and the social motive to use the legal system. J Legal Stud 26: 575–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierzbinski J (1994). Guilty until proven innocent: regulation with costly and limited enforcement. J Environ Econ Manage 27: 127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA’s Audit Policy, http://www.epa.gov/compliance/incentives/auditing/auditpolicy.html visited October 6, 2003

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Langpap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langpap, C. Self-Reporting and Private Enforcement in Environmental Regulation. Environ Resource Econ 40, 489–506 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9166-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9166-8

Keywords

Jel Codes

Navigation