Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Taxation and Vertical Cournot Oligopolies: How Eco-industries Matter

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article specifies what an optimal pollution tax should be when dealing with a vertical Cournot oligopoly. Polluting firms sell final goods to consumers and outsource their abatement activities to an environment industry. It is assumed that both markets are imperfectly competitive. Thus, the tax is a single instrument used to regulate three sorts of distortions, one negative externality and two restrictions in production. Consequently, the optimal tax rate is the result of a trade-off that depends on the firms’ market power along the vertical structure. A detailed analysis of Cournot-Nash equilibria in both markets is also performed. In this context, the efficiency of abatement activities plays a key-role. It gives a new understanding to the necessary conditions for the emergence of an eco-industrial sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett AH (1980). The Pigouvian tax rule under monopoly. Am Econ Rev 70(5): 1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton JR (1997) The north–south dimension of the environment and cleaner technology industries. Discussion paper, Institute for New Technologies, United Nations University, Maastricht

  • Baumol WJ (1995). Environmental industries with substancial start-up costs as contributors to trade competitiveness. Annu Rev Energy Environ 20: 71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg DR, Ferrier G, Paugh J (1998) The U.S. environmental industry. U.S. Department of Commerce Buchanan, Office of Technology Policy

  • Buchanan JM (1969). External deseconomies, corrective taxes and market structures. Am Econ Rev 59: 174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • David M and Sinclair-Desgagné B (2005). Environmental regulation and the eco-industry. J Regul Econ 28(2): 141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecotech Research and Consulting Limited (2002) Analysis of the EU eco-industries, their employment and export potentials. Technical report, European Commissions, DG Environment

  • European Commission, DG Environment (2006) Eco-industry, its size, employment perspectives and barriers to growth in an enlarged EU. Ernst and Young Environment and Sustainability Services

  • Gaudet G and Salant SW (1991). Uniqueness of Cournot equilibrium: new results from old methods. Rev Econ Stud 58(2): 399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaker M (2006). Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manage 56: 411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SF and Requate T (2004). Vertical structure and strategic environmental trade policy. J Environ Econ Manage 47(2): 260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa J and Spencer B (1999). Rent-shifting export subsidies with an imported intermediate product. J Int Econ 48: 199–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett M, Steenblik R (2005) Environmental goods and services: a synthesis of country studies. OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2005/3

  • Kolstad CD and Mathiesen L (1987). Necessary and sufficient conditions for uniqueness of a Cournot equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 54(4): 681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D (1985). Taxation within Cournot oligopoly. J Public Econ 27: 281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long NV and Soubeyran A (2000). Existence and uniqueness of Cournot equilibrium: a contraction mapping approach. Econ Lett 67: 345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimubona A-D, Sinclair-Desgagné B (2005) The Pigouvian tax rule in the presence of an eco-industry. FEEM. Nota de lavoro (57-2005)

  • Numeri I. and R.D.I. (2004) Panorama des eco-entreprises. Technical report, Ministère de l’économie et des finances

  • OECD (1996) The global environmental goods and services industry. Technical report

  • OECD (1999) The Environmental oods and services industry: manual for data collection and analysis. OCDE Editions, Paris

  • Okuguchi K (2004) Optimal pollution tax in Cournot oligopsonistic oligopoly. Working paper, Departments of Economics and Information, Gifu Shotoku Galuen University

  • Petrakis E and Xepapadeas A (2003). Location decisions of a polluting firm and the time consistency of environmental policy. Resour Energy Econ 25: 197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou AC (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson R (1995). Optimal pollution tax in a Cournot duopoly. Environ Resour Econ 6: 359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Canton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canton, J., Soubeyran, A. & Stahn, H. Environmental Taxation and Vertical Cournot Oligopolies: How Eco-industries Matter. Environ Resource Econ 40, 369–382 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9158-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9158-8

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation