Abstract
The paper examines the effect of freer North–South trade in goods on pollution, commodity terms-of-trade and national welfare, utilizing a factor endowment framework. North and South are distinguished in terms of the relative endowment of a pollution causing natural resource: South is relatively more resource abundant. Compared to the analysis of Copeland and Taylor (1994)—which is the central work so far on this subject—this paper internalizes the commodity terms-of-trade impact of individual environment policies. It is derived that if countries specialize completely in the free-trade equilibrium, both are induced to reduce their pollution as compared to autarky. It is interesting and paradoxical that the South also reduces its pollution, despite specializing in the pollution-intensive good. Again, contrary to common perception, free trade may entail an overall terms-of-trade loss for the North, while South will always have a positive change in the terms-of-trade. Finally, inspite of better environment, free trade may cause both the countries to gain or lose in terms of aggregate welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhagwati J and Srinivasan TN (1996). Trade and the environment: does environmental diversity detract from the case for free trade?. In: Bhagwati, J and Robert, E. Hudec (eds) Fair trade and harmonization: prerequisites for free trade? Volume I: economic analysis, pp 159–223. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA
Chandar P, Khan A (1999) International treaties on trade and global pollution. CORE Discussion Paper No. 9903, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Universite Catholique De Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
Chichilinsky G (1995). North–South trade and the global environment. Am Econ Rev 85: 851–874
Copeland BR and Taylor MS (1994). North-South Trade and the Environment. Q J Econ 109: 755–787
Copeland BR and Taylor MS (1995). Trade and transboundary pollution. Am Econ Rev 85: 716–737
Copeland BR and Taylor MS (2004). Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Literature 42: 7–71
Das SP (2001). Optimal pollution standard in an open economy: characterizing environmental diversity. Rev Int Econ 9: 429–442
Dixit AL, Norman V (1980) Theory of international trade, Cambridge University Press
Mehra MK, Das SP (2002) North-South trade and pollution migration: the debate revisited. In: Marsiliani L, Rauscher M, Withagen C (eds) Environmental economics and the international economy, Economy and Environment, Vol. 25. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 21–32
Newbery David MG and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1984). Pareto inferior trade. Rev Econ Stud 51: 1–12
Rauscher M (1994). On ecological dumping. Oxford Econ Papers 46: 822–840
Turunen-Red Arja H and Woodland AD (2004). Multilateral reforms of trade and environment policy. Rev Int Econ 12: 321–336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research has benefitted from comments received at the conference on International Dimension of Environment Policy organized by the European Science Foundation and Tilburg University, October 7–12, 2000 Kerkrade, The Netherlands and the International Conference on Environment and Development organized by CITD, School of International Studies, JNU, April 7–8, 2005, New Delhi, India, as well as those received from two anonymous referees. A small section of this research was published in Mehra and Das (2002).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehra, M.K., Das, S.P. North–South Trade and Pollution Migration: The Debate Revisited. Environ Resource Econ 40, 139–164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9145-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9145-0