Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public Preferences for Hydrogen Buses: Comparing Interval Data, OLS and Quantile Regression Approaches

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use a quantile regression (QR) approach to analyse contingent valuation estimates of public willingness to pay (WTP) for the air and noise pollution reductions associated with the introduction of hydrogen buses in London. QR results show that variables that were not significant in interval regression or ordinary least squares regression become significant at certain quantiles along the WTP distribution. In addition, the determinants of WTP at the lower tail of the distribution differ from those at the higher end of the distribution. Our findings illustrate the usefulness of quantile regression methods for analysing contingent valuation data, enhancing our understanding of the determinants of willingness to pay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz W., DeShazo J. R. (2006). Frontiers in Stated Preference Methods: An Introduction. Environmental and Resource Economics 34(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett G., Koenker R. (1982). Tests of Linear Hypotheses and L1 Estimation. Econometrica 50:1577–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I., Carson R. T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D. W., Sugden R., Swanson J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I. J., Langford I. H., Turner R. K., Willis K. G., Garrod G. D. (1995). Elicitation and Truncation Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies. Ecological Economics 12(2):161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T.K., Haisken-DeNew J.P. (2001). Employer Learning and the Returns to Scholing. Labour Economics 8(2):161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur D., Saisana M., Schilze N. (2004). Modelling the Effects of Meteorological Variables on Ozone Concentration – A Quantile Regression Approach. Atmospheric Environment 38:4689–4699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belluzzo W. J. (2004). Semiparametric Approaches to Welfare Evaluations in Binary Response Models. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 22(3):322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall P. C., Adamowicz W. L. (2002). Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23:421–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R., I. J. Bateman, C. Saunders and I. H. Langford (1999), ‘Perception and Valuation of Risk Reduction as a Public and Private Good: Investigating Methodological Issues in Contingent Valuation of UV Risks in New Zealand’, CSERGE Working Paper GEC 99–06

  • Cameron T. A., Huppert D. D. (1989). OLS versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17:230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooker J. R., Herriges J. A. (2004). Parametric and Semi-parametric Estimation of Willingness to Pay in the Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Framework. Environmental and Resource Economics 27:451–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty C. (2001) Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod G., Willis K. (1999). Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead J. M., Lindsay B. E., Brown C. M. (1991). Use of the Tobit Model in Contingent Valuation: Experimental Evidence from the Pemigewaset Wilderness Area. Journal of Environmental Management 33:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlstrom M. (2005). Local Environmental Benefits of Fuel Cell Buses – A Case Study. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(7):679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. (2006), The Quantreg Package, Version 3.89, April 9th 2006, Available on: http://www.r-project.org

  • Koenker, R. (2003), Short Course on Quantile Regression, CEMMAP Master Class: Quantile Regression February 2003 (http://cemmap.ifs.org.uk/docs/koenker_mc_handout.pdf)

  • Koenker R. W., Bassett G. W. (1982). Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity based on Regression Quantiles. Econometrica 50:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R., Bassett G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R., Hallock K. (2001). Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R., Machado J. (1999). Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94:1296–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordas, G. (2000), Binary regression quantiles. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertaton Services

  • Li C. (1996). Semiparametric Estimation of the Binary Choice Model for Contingent Valuation. Land Economics 72(4):462–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J. S., Freese J. (2006). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edn. Stata Press, College Station TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala G.S. (1999) Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins P.S., Pereira P.T. (2004). Does Education Reduce Wage Inequality? Quantile Regression Evidence from 16 Countries. Labour Economics 11(3):355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello M., Perrelli R. (2003). Growth Equations: A Quantile Regression Exploration. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 43:643–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milon J. W., Scrogin D. (2006). Latent Preferences and Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Restoration. Ecological Economics 56:162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R. C., Carson R. T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey E., Thacher J., Breffle W. (2006). Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model. Environmental and Resource Economics 34(1):91–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourato, S., B. Saynor and D. Hart (2004), `Greening London's black cabs: a study of driver's preferences for fuel cell taxis', Energy Policy 32, 685–695

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS (2004), in P. Causer and T. Williams, eds., Region in Figures: London, Summer edition. London: Office for National Statistics

  • Schimek P. (2001). Reducing Emissions from Transit Buses. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31:433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STATA (2006), ‘STATA Analysis Examples: Interval Regression’, UCLA Academic Technology Services, Available on: www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/dae/intreg.htm

  • TfL (2002) London Travel Report, Transport for London. Downloadable on (www.tfl.gov.uk/londontravelreport)

  • Whitehead J., Hobant T., Clifford W. (1995). Measurement Issues with Iterated, Continuous/Interval Contingent Valuation Data. Journal of Environmental Management 43:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Roger Koenker, Peter Pearson, Paul Johnson, David Hart, two anonymous reviewers and the editor for very helpful comments. We also thank Tiago Neves for his data from the ACCEPTH2 project, as well as Lisa Garrity, Simon Whitehouse, Matthias Altmann, Cornelia Grasel and Anne Stevcevski for valuable collaboration in the design of the core questionnaire. Finally, we acknowledge financial support from the European Union under the ACCEPTH2 project (Contract No ENK5-CT-2002-80653) and from the John Stanley Studentship (for Tanya O’Garra).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana Mourato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Garra, T., Mourato, S. Public Preferences for Hydrogen Buses: Comparing Interval Data, OLS and Quantile Regression Approaches. Environ Resource Econ 36, 389–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9024-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9024-0

Key words

Navigation