Skip to main content

Alternative Models of Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Site Demand

Abstract

A controversial recreation activity is off-highway vehicle use. Off-highway vehicle use is controversial because it is incompatible with most other activities and is extremely hard on natural eco-systems. This study estimates utility theoretic incomplete demand systems for four off-highway vehicle sites. Since two sets of restrictions are equally consistent with utility theory both are imposed and the best fitting restrictions are identified using Voung’s non-nested testing scheme. The demand system is modeled using both Poisson and negative binomial II distributions. Data are provided by a survey conducted at four recreational off-highway vehicle (OHV) sites in western North Carolina.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Burt O. and D. Brewer. (1971). Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor Recreation. Econometrica 52(1971):32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A.C., P. Trivedi. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Englin J., D. Lambert. (1995). Measuring Angling Quality in Count Data Models of Recreational Fishing: A Non-nested Test of Three Approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics 6:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englin J., P. Boxall, D. Watson. (1998). Modeling Recreation Demand in a Poisson System of Equations: An Analysis of the Impact of International Exchange Rates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englin J., Shonkwiler J. S. (1995). Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long Run Recreation Demand Under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation. Review of Economics and Statistics 77:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L. (1982). Integrability of Incomplete Systems of Demand Functions Review of Economic Studies 49:411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A. (1984). Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models. Econometrica 52:701–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance J. (1990). Incomplete Demand Systems and Semilogarithmic Demand Models. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 34(2):118–131

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, J. T. and W. M. Hanemann (1984), On the Integration of Some Common Demand Systems. Staff Papers in Economics. Staff Paper 83–10

  • J. LaFrance, W. M. Hanemann (1989). The Dual Structure of Incomplete Demand Systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Haefen R. H. (2002). A Complete Characterization of the Linear, Log-Linear, and Semi-Log Incomplete Demand System Models. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27(2):281–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuong Q. H. (1989). Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H. (1980). A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research supported in part by the US Forest Service and the Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station, Publication # 51042924. The authors appreciate the comments and suggestion of two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Englin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Englin, J., Holmes, T. & Niell, R. Alternative Models of Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Site Demand. Environ Resource Econ 35, 327–338 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9017-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9017-z

Keywords

  • incomplete demand system
  • integrability
  • off-road vehicle
  • travel cost

JEL classification

  • Q26
  • C35
  • C51