Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Tax Policy under Environmental Quality Competition

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the socially optimal emission and commodity tax policy when consumers are willing to pay a price-premium for environmentally friendlier variants of a commodity vertically differentiated in environmental quality. The first-best levels of quality can be obtained by a combination of a uniform ad valorem tax and an emission tax (or a subsidy for buying green products). The first-best emission tax is higher than the social valuation of the positive externality associated with average environmental quality. Regardless of environmentally conscious consumers, if only one instrument is available, the second-best emission tax is equal to the social valuation of the positive externality associated with average environmental quality. A uniform ad valorem tax increases welfare only if the social valuation of the positive externality associated with average environmental quality is low enough.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Arora S. Gangopadhyay (1995) ArticleTitle‘Toward a Theoretical Model of Voluntary Overcompliance’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28 289–309 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(95)00037-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Barnett (1980) ArticleTitle‘The Pigouvian Tax Rule under Monopoly’ American Economic Review 70 1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Crampes A. Hollander (1995) ArticleTitle‘Duopoly and Quality Standards’ European Economic Review 39 71–82 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-2921(94)00041-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Cremer J. F. Thisse (1994) ArticleTitle‘Commodity Taxation in a Differentiated Oligopoly’ International Economic Review 35 613–633

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Cremer J. F. Thisse (1999) ArticleTitle‘On the Taxation of Polluting Products in a Differentiated Industry’ European Economic Review 43 575–594 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00021-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Darby E. Karny (1973) ArticleTitle‘Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud’ Journal of Law and Economics 16 67–88 Occurrence Handle10.1086/466756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Deci R. M. Ryan (2000) ArticleTitle‘The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior’ Psychological Inquiry 11 227–268 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. Ebert (1992) ArticleTitle‘Pigouvian Taxes and Market Structure: The Case of Oligopoly and Different Abatement Technologies’ Finanzarchiv 49 154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ecchia L. Lambertini (1997) ArticleTitle‘Minimum Quality Standards and Collusion’ Journal of Industrial Economics 45 101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecchia, G. and L. Lambertini (1998), Market Coverage and the Existence of Equilibrium in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly, wp 311, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università degli Studi di Bologna.

  • Farhar, B. and A. Houston (1996), [online]. Willingness to Pay for Electricity from Renewable Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-460-21216, Available from http://www.eren.doe.gov/greenpower/willing.html\ #overall.

  • B. Frey F. Oberholzer-Gee (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out’ American Economic Review 87 IssueID4 746–755

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gabszewicz J.-F. Thisse (1979) ArticleTitle‘Price Competition, Quality, and Income Disparities’ Journal of Economic Theory 20 340–359 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(79)90041-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Grossman B. Krueger (1995) ArticleTitle‘Economic Growth and the Environment’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 IssueID2 353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hauch (2003) ArticleTitle‘Electricity Trade and CO2 Emission Reductions in the Nordic Countries’ Energy Economics 25 509–526 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-9883(03)00037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. (2000), Low Quality Leadership in Vertically Differentiated Duopoly, Department of Economics, University of York, Discussion Paper 00/38.

  • L. Lambertini M. Mosca (1999) ArticleTitle‘On the Regulation of a Vertically Differentiated Market’ Australian Economic Papers 38 354–366 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8454.00062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Levin (1985) ArticleTitle‘Taxation within Cournot Duopoly’ Journal of Public Economics 27 281–290 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(85)90052-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Levin (1990) ArticleTitle‘Consumers Turning Green: JWT survey’ Advertising Age 61 74

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lutz T. P. Lyon J. W. Maxwell (2000) ArticleTitle‘Quality Leadership when Regulatory Standards are Forthcoming’ Journal of Industrial Economics 48 331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Moraga-Gonzalez N. Padron-Fumero (2002) ArticleTitle‘Environmental Policy in a Green Market’ Environmental and Resource Economics 22 IssueID3 419–447

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Motta (1993) ArticleTitle‘Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quality Competition’ Journal of Industrial Economics 41 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. and J.-F.Thisse (1993), Minimum Quality Standards as an Environmental Policy: Domestic and International Effects, Nota di Lavoro 20.93, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.

  • M. Mussa S. Rosen (1978) ArticleTitle‘Monopoly and product Quality’ Journal of Economic Theory 18 301–317 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Requate (1993a) ArticleTitle‘Pollution Control in a Cournot Duopoly Via Taxes or Permits’ Journal of Economics 58 255–291

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Requate (1993b) ArticleTitle‘Pollution Control under Imperfect Competition: Asymmetric Bertrand Duopoly with Linear Technologies’ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149 415–442

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Requate (1997) ArticleTitle‘Green Taxes in Oligopoly if the Number of Firms is Endogenous’ Finanzarchiv 54 IssueID2 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Ronnen (1991) ArticleTitle‘Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition’ Rand Journal of Economics 22 491–504

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Scarpa (1998) ArticleTitle‘Minimum Quality Standards with More than Two Firms’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 665–676 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01051-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Shaked J. Sutton (1982) ArticleTitle‘Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation’ Review of Economic Studies 49 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sørgard (1997) ArticleTitle‘Domestic Merger Policy in an International Oligopoly: The Nordic Market for Electricity’ Energy Economics 19 IssueID2 239–253 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-9883(96)01016-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Tirole (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Wasik (1996) Green Marketing and Management: A Global Perspective Blackwell Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Lombardini-Riipinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lombardini-Riipinen, C. Optimal Tax Policy under Environmental Quality Competition. Environ Resource Econ 32, 317–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4680-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4680-z

Keywords

JEL classifications

Navigation