The Effect of Risk Characteristics on the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions from Electric Power Generation
- 281 Downloads
The objective of this study is to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for the reduction of mortality risks caused by fossil fuel (natural gas, coal and oil) versus nuclear electric power generation systems and to examine the influence of risk characteristics involved with electric power generation on WTP. A choice experiment was conducted to achieve these objectives. The attributes for nuclear risks in the experiment included the probability of disasters and the expected losses if a disaster occurs. We find evidence of (i) a baseline effect (where WTP is sensitive to hypothetical versus actual baseline expected mortality); (ii) a ‘labeling effect,’ where, surprisingly, the term ‘nuclear’ has no effect on WTP, but the term ‘fossil-fueled power generation’ results in lower WTP; and (iii) disaster aversion, meaning that people focus on the conditional loss from a nuclear disaster, not the probability. We also find that the WTP for reducing deaths from a nuclear disaster is about 60 times the WTP for routine reducing fossil-fuel generation-related deaths.
Keywordschoice experiment coal-fired generation mortality nuclear power risk characteristics willingness to pay
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adler, M. D. (2003), ‘Fear Assessment: Benefit Cost Analysis and the Pricing of Fear and Anxiety’, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Working Paper 03-12.Google Scholar
- European Commission (1999), Extern-E: Externalities of Energy, vol. 7. Methodology 1998 Update. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 1–518.Google Scholar
- Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G. 1994‘Towards a Willingness-to-Pay based Value of Underground Safety’Journal of Transport Economics and Policy288398Google Scholar
- Krupnick, A., Markandya, A., Nickell, E. 1993‘The External Cost of Nuclear Power: Ex Ante Damages and Lay Risks’American Journal of Agricultural Economics75 12731279Google Scholar
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future1994Estimating Fuel Cycle Externalities: Analytical Method and IssuesMcGraw-Hill/Utility Data InstituteWashington, DCReport No. 2.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. 1987‘Perception of Risk’Science236280285Google Scholar
- Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1979‘Rating the Risks’Environment21142036–39Google Scholar
- Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare20042002 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of the People on Health and WelfareHealth and Welfare Statistics AssociationJapanGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications (2002), 2000 Population Census of Japan. Japan Statistical Association.Google Scholar
- Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications (2002), 2001 Family Income and Expenditure Survey. Japan Statistical Association.Google Scholar
- Train, K. 2003Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation.Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar