Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 201–227 | Cite as

Climate Policy under Technology Spillovers

  • Rolf Golombek
  • Michael Hoel


We study climate policy when there are technology spillovers between countries, as there is no instrument that (directly) corrects for these externalities. Without an international climate agreement, the (non-cooperative) equilibrium depends on whether countries use tradable quotas or carbon taxes as their environmental policy instruments. All countries are better-off in the tax case than in the quota case. Two types of international climate agreements are then studied: One is a Kyoto type of agreement where each country is assigned a specific number of internationally tradable quotas. In the second type of agreement, a common carbon tax is used domestically in all countries. None of the cases satisfy the conditions for the social optimum. Even if the quota price is equal to the Pigovian level, R&D investments will be lower than what is socially optimal in the quota case. It is also argued that the quota agreement gives higher R&D expenditures and more abatement than the tax agreement.


climate policy international environmental agreements R&D technology spillovers 

JEL classifications

O30 H23 Q20 Q28 Q48 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Buonanno, B., Carraro, C., Castelnuovo, E., Galeotti, M. 2000‘Efficiency and Equity of Emission Trading with Endogenous Environmental Technical Change’Carraro, C. eds. Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change PolicyKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Buonanno, B., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M. 2003‘Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto’Resource and Energy Economics251134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carraro, C. 1998‘Climate Modelling and Policy Strategies. The Role of Technological Change and Uncertainty’Energy Economics20463471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischer, C. (2000), ‘Climate Change Policy Choices and Technological Innovation’, Resources for the Future, Climate Issue Brief 20 Google Scholar
  5. Golombek, R. and M. Hoel (2003), ‘Climate Policy under Technology Spillovers’, Memorandum from Department of Economics, University of Oslo, 22/2003.Google Scholar
  6. Goulder, L. H., Mathai, K. 2000‘Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management39138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goulder, L. H., Schneider, S. 1999‘Induced Technological Change, Crowding out, and the Attractiveness of CO2 Emissions Abatement’Resource and Environmental Economics21211253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoel, M. 1992‘Carbon Taxes: An International Tax or Harmonized Domestic Taxes?’European Economic Review36400406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoel, M. 1993‘Harmonization of Carbon Taxes in International Climate Agreements’Environmental and Resource Economics3221232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe, B., G.Newell, and R. Stavins (2002), ‘Environmental Policy and Technological Change’. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (special issue), 41–69Google Scholar
  11. Katsoulacos, Y. 1997‘R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Subsidies and International Agreements’Carraro, C. eds. International Environmental Negotiations. Strategic Policy IssuesEdward ElgarCheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller, W. 2002‘Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion’American Economic Review92120142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Löschel, A. 2002‘Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey’Ecological Economics43105126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Millock, K. 2002‘Technology Transfers in the Clean Development Mechanism: An Incentive Issue’Environment and Development Economics7449466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nordhaus, W. D. 2000‘Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy’Yale UniversityMimeoGoogle Scholar
  16. Ploeg, F., Zeeuw, A. 1994‘Investment in Clean Technology and Transboundary Pollution Control’Carraro, C. eds. Trade, Innovation, EnvironmentKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasmussen, T. N. 2001‘CO2 Abatement Policy with Learning-by-doing in Renewable Energy’Resource and Energy Economics23297325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rivera-Batiz, L., Romer, P. 1991‘Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth’Quarterly Journal of Economics106531555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosendahl, K. E. (2002), ‘Cost-effective Environmental Policy: Implications of Induced Technological Change’, Statistics Norway, Discussion Paper No. 314.Google Scholar
  20. Westskog, H. 1996‘Market Power in a System of Tradable CO quotas’The Energy Journal1785103Google Scholar
  21. Xepapadeas, A. 1995‘Induced Technical Change and International Agreements under Greenhouse Warming’Resource and Energy Economics17123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frisch CentreOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations