Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Respondent Experience/Knowledge in the Elicitation of Contingent Values: An Investigation of Convergent Validity, Procedural Invariance and Reliability

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tests of convergent validity and procedural invariance were used to investigate whether individuals lacking direct experience with a commodity can provide valid responses to contingent-valuation questions eliciting ex post use values. Convergent validity between samples with and without experience was shown to hold for dichotomous-choice responses, but not for open-ended responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. E. Biondini P. W. Mielke E. F. Redente (1988) ArticleTitle‘Permutation Techniques Based on Euclidean Analysis Spaces: A New and Powerful Statistical Method for Ecological Research’ Coenoses 3 IssueID3 155–174

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Bishop (1982) ArticleTitle‘Option Value: An Exposition and Extension’ Land Economics 58 IssueID1 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Boyle F. R. Johnson D. W. McCollum (1997) ArticleTitle‘Anchoring and Adjustment in Single-Bounded Contingent-Valuation Questions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 IssueID5 1495–1500

    Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Boyle M. P. Welsh R. C. Bishop (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent Valuation Studies’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 IssueID1 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • E. G. Carmines R. A. Zeller (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment Sage Publications Beverly Hills, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., T. Groves and M. J. Machina (2000), ‘Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions’, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, California (www.econ.ucsd.edu/ %7Ercarson/cgm.pdf).

  • R. T. Carson W. M. Hanemann R. J. Kopp J. A. Krosnick R. C. Mitchell S. Presser P. A. Ruud V. K. Smith (1997) ArticleTitle‘Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation’ Land Economics 73 IssueID2 151–163

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Conover (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics John Wiley & Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. K Haener P. C. Boxall W. L. Adamowicz (2001) ArticleTitle‘Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 IssueID3 629–642

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Huang V. K. Smith (1998) ArticleTitle‘Monte Carlo Benchmarks for Discrete Response Valuation Methods’ Land Economics 74 IssueID2 186–202

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman A. Tversky (1984) ArticleTitle‘Choices, Values, and Frames’ American Psychologist 39 341–50

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Park J. B. Loomis M. Creel (1991) ArticleTitle‘Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies’ Land Economics 67 IssueID1 64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Roach K. J. Boyle J. C. Bergstrom S. D. Reiling (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Instream Flows on Whitewater Visitation and Consumer Surplus: A Contingent Valuation Application to the Dead River, Maine’ Rivers 7 IssueID1 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • W. L. Slauson B. S. Cade J. D. Richards (1991) Users Manual for BLOSSOM Statistical Software National Ecology Research Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • M. T. Teisl K. J. Boyle D. W. McCollum S. D. Reiling (1995) ArticleTitle‘Test–Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Posttest Control Groups’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 IssueID3 613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • G. M. Zimmerman H. Goetz P. W. Mielke (1985) ArticleTitle‘Use of an Improved Statistical Method For Group Comparisons to Study Effects of Prairie Fire’ Ecology 66 606–611

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Mccollum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mccollum, D.W., Boyle, K.J. The Effect of Respondent Experience/Knowledge in the Elicitation of Contingent Values: An Investigation of Convergent Validity, Procedural Invariance and Reliability. Environ Resource Econ 30, 23–33 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-0758-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-0758-2

Keywords

Navigation