Abstract
Tests of convergent validity and procedural invariance were used to investigate whether individuals lacking direct experience with a commodity can provide valid responses to contingent-valuation questions eliciting ex post use values. Convergent validity between samples with and without experience was shown to hold for dichotomous-choice responses, but not for open-ended responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. E. Biondini P. W. Mielke E. F. Redente (1988) ArticleTitle‘Permutation Techniques Based on Euclidean Analysis Spaces: A New and Powerful Statistical Method for Ecological Research’ Coenoses 3 IssueID3 155–174
R. C. Bishop (1982) ArticleTitle‘Option Value: An Exposition and Extension’ Land Economics 58 IssueID1 1–15
K. J. Boyle F. R. Johnson D. W. McCollum (1997) ArticleTitle‘Anchoring and Adjustment in Single-Bounded Contingent-Valuation Questions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 IssueID5 1495–1500
K. J. Boyle M. P. Welsh R. C. Bishop (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent Valuation Studies’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 IssueID1 45–55
E. G. Carmines R. A. Zeller (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment Sage Publications Beverly Hills, California
Carson, R. T., T. Groves and M. J. Machina (2000), ‘Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions’, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, California (www.econ.ucsd.edu/ %7Ercarson/cgm.pdf).
R. T. Carson W. M. Hanemann R. J. Kopp J. A. Krosnick R. C. Mitchell S. Presser P. A. Ruud V. K. Smith (1997) ArticleTitle‘Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation’ Land Economics 73 IssueID2 151–163
W. J. Conover (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics John Wiley & Sons New York
M. K Haener P. C. Boxall W. L. Adamowicz (2001) ArticleTitle‘Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 IssueID3 629–642
J. C. Huang V. K. Smith (1998) ArticleTitle‘Monte Carlo Benchmarks for Discrete Response Valuation Methods’ Land Economics 74 IssueID2 186–202
D. Kahneman A. Tversky (1984) ArticleTitle‘Choices, Values, and Frames’ American Psychologist 39 341–50
T. Park J. B. Loomis M. Creel (1991) ArticleTitle‘Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies’ Land Economics 67 IssueID1 64–73
B. Roach K. J. Boyle J. C. Bergstrom S. D. Reiling (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Instream Flows on Whitewater Visitation and Consumer Surplus: A Contingent Valuation Application to the Dead River, Maine’ Rivers 7 IssueID1 11–20
W. L. Slauson B. S. Cade J. D. Richards (1991) Users Manual for BLOSSOM Statistical Software National Ecology Research Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service Fort Collins, Colorado
M. T. Teisl K. J. Boyle D. W. McCollum S. D. Reiling (1995) ArticleTitle‘Test–Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Posttest Control Groups’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 IssueID3 613–619
G. M. Zimmerman H. Goetz P. W. Mielke (1985) ArticleTitle‘Use of an Improved Statistical Method For Group Comparisons to Study Effects of Prairie Fire’ Ecology 66 606–611
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mccollum, D.W., Boyle, K.J. The Effect of Respondent Experience/Knowledge in the Elicitation of Contingent Values: An Investigation of Convergent Validity, Procedural Invariance and Reliability. Environ Resource Econ 30, 23–33 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-0758-2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-0758-2