Skip to main content
Log in

The integration of digital games in elementary schools: The principals’ point of view

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine the perceptions of elementary school principals regarding the value of integrating digital games in teaching and learning and the steps they take to promote this initiative. The study was conducted using a qualitative-narrative methodology to analyze data retrieved through semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted with 18 school principals. The findings demonstrated that the school principals had a positive attitude toward the integration of digital games in teaching although they are not experts in this field. They described several steps they take to promote digital games integration in teaching: (1) systemwide strategic steps, which include formulating a vision and mission; promoting teachers’ professional development; and resource allocation; (2) individual-initiatives, which include modeling; empowering teachers; and creating a leadership group among the teachers. These steps are perceived as creating “islands of innovation,” which are meant to infiltrate into the organizational culture of the school, so as to become integral and sustainable practices. These findings may help create new official policies for integrating digital games at school, thus instilling a change in the school culture. The study underscores the important role of school principals as agents of change in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The datasets are not publicly available due to participant privacy but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., & Siraj, S. (2012). Factors affecting the transformational leadership role of principals in implementing ICT in schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 11(4), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • All, A., Plovie, B., Castellar, E. P. N., & Van-Looy, J. (2017). Pre-test influences on the effectiveness of digital-game based learning: A case study of a fire safety game. Computers and Education, 114, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allsop, Y., & Jessel, J. (2015). Teachers’ experience and reflections on game-based learning in the primary classroom: Views from England and Italy. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 5(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, A., Ab-Jalil, H., Muhamad, M., & Nasharuddin, N. A. (2021). Correlation between cultural perceptions, leadership style and ICT usage by school principals in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176(20), 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avidov-Ungar, O., & Eshet-Alkalay, Y. (2014). Islands of Innovation: A critical analysis of a model for innovation implementation in school systems. Adult Education in Israel, 13, 60–90.

  • Avidov-Ungar, O., & Hayak, M. (2021). Teacher perception of the adoption and implementation of DGBL in their classroom teaching: Adoption and implementation of DGBL among teachers. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 11(1), 17–30.

  • Benoliel, P. (2017). Managing senior management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G. M., & Whiteman, R. S. (2016). Effective Preparation Program features: A Literature Review. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(1), 120–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, A. K., & Dubé, N. J. (2021). Policies to guide the adoption of educational games into classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 67, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayak, M., & Avidov-Ungar, O., (2020). The Integration of Digital game-based learning into the instruction: Teachers’ perceptions at different career stages. TechTrends, 64(6), 887–898.

  • Huizenga, J. C., Dam, T., Voogt, G. T. M., J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers and Education, 110, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwa, S. P. (2018). Pedagogical change in mathematics learning: Harnessing the power of digital game-based learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 21(4), 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: A relational approach. Guilford Press.

  • Karahan, E., BİLİCİ, S. C., & Ayçin, Ü. N. A. L. (2015). Integration of media design processes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. D., & Schwanenberg, J. (2022). Ready to lead school improvement? Perceived professional development needs of principals in Germany. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 50(3), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocasarac, H., Taspinar, M., & Karatas, H. (2019). Perceptions of school principals working at science and social sciences high schools on the characteristics of innovative teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 18(3), 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruszewska, A., Nazaruk, S., & Szewczyk, K. (2022). Polish teachers of early education in the face of distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic– the difficulties experienced and suggestions for the future. Education 3–13, 50(3), 304–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardou, A., Rigou, M., Panagiotarou, A., & Garofalakis, J. (2022). Effect of OSLM features and gamification motivators on motivation in DGBL: Pupils’ viewpoint. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Saga.

  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD and McREL.

  • Mutongoza, B. H., Olawale, B. E., & Mzilikazi, B. (2021). Chronicling school principals’ experiences on school management in the context of Covid-19 stringency. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(3), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikdel-Teymori, A., & Fardin, M. A. (2020). Covid-19 and educational challenges: A review of the benefits of online education. Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research, 18(3), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noraddin, E. M., & Kian, N. T. (2015). Three learning potentials in digital games: Perception of Malaysian university teachers. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 11(2), 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. L. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ ICT leadership. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 302–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, A., Thannimalai, R., & Ismail, S. N. (2019). Principals’ technology leadership and its effect on teachers’ technology integration in 21st-century classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free.

  • Romero, M., Usart, M., & Ott, M. (2015). Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st-century skills? Games and Culture, 10(2), 148–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shkedi, A. (2004). Second-order theoretical analysis: A method for constructing theoretical explanation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(5), 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Niekerk, E. J., & van Wyk, M. M. (2014). Staff’s perceptions of vision and long-term principal leadership in South African schools: An exploratory study. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 406–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventakesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Mis Quarterly, 157–178.

  • Waxman, H. C., Boriack, A. W., Lee, Y. H., & MacNeil, A. (2013). Principals’ perceptions of the importance of technology in schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of Covid-19. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemini, M., Addi-Raccah, A., & Katarivas, K. (2015). I have a dream: School principals as entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 43(4), 526–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yosef-Hassidim, D., & Eyal, A. (2009). Teachers who show initiative: The stories of three champions of technology. Mor-Tech: The National Center for Teachers of Technological Disciplines, 328–334 (Hebrew).

Download references

Funding

The study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Avidov-Ungar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

  1. A.

    Outline of Interview Questions.

  1. 1.

    What do you think of technological innovation?

  2. 2.

    What are digital games and what is your opinion of DGBL?

  3. 3.

    What is your vision for integrating technological innovations in general and DGBL in particular into teaching practices?

  4. 4.

    How can DGBL be integrated into teachers’ practices and what is your role in this endeavor? Do you think that the implementation of DGBL is succeeding? Please explain.

  5. 5.

    Do you think that integrating DGBL in teaching helps teachers adopt other technologies into their teaching practices? If so, please provide examples and explain why you think this happens.

  6. 6.

    Do you think that setting a policy for integrating DGBL into teaching can help disseminate innovative technologies at your school? If so, how?

  7. 7.

    What did you do to prepare for the integration of DGBL into teaching in your school? What stages should be included in the plan, from your perspective?

  8. 8.

    What steps do you take to disseminate innovative technologies in general and DGBL in particular in your school?

  9. 9.

    What do you do to recruit teachers to cooperate in the integration of DGBL into teaching practices and do you support them during this process?

  10. 10.

    What steps do you take when teachers encounter difficulties or do not cooperate in integrating DGBL into their teaching practices?

  11. 11.

    What do you consider the challenges and difficulties in disseminating innovative technology in your school and especially those related to the integration of DGBL into classroom teaching?

  12. 12.

    What characteristics do you believe help you lead the change for integrating innovative technologies and DGBL into teaching practices in your school? Please explain.

  13. 13.

    How do you see your role as a school principal who has created a policy and work plan for integrating DGBL into teaching practices?

  14. 14.

    What advice would you give new school principals about leading a policy for the integration of DGBL into teaching and the dissemination of innovative technologies in general?

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodedatov, S., Avidov-Ungar, O. & Hayak, M. The integration of digital games in elementary schools: The principals’ point of view. Educ Inf Technol 29, 18003–18021 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12568-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12568-4

Keywords

Navigation