Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitize engineers to serious games via scratch

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes an experiment in which engineering students create serious games (SG) that tackle problems relevant to their jobs. This experiment was conducted as part of the “Business Games” module we taught students enrolled in the Master’s program “Innovation Management” at the National School of Engineers of Tunis. By asking these engineers to create their games, we first aim to confirm that this reinforces their mastery of the course content. It also allows them to apply the concepts they have learned. We also intend to innovate by basing the module evaluation on students’ games. Sensitizing these engineers to the value of SG within the organization is a crucial part of our objectives. To create their games, we asked the students to use the Scratch environment. At the end of the semester, the students presented their achievements and completed a questionnaire. Its results reveal that the experiment was highly appreciated by the students and that, overall, we achieved our objectives. This article discusses SGs and how their development affects student learning. Moreover, these engineers indicated that before developing their games, they carefully reviewed the course material. To create their games, they also studied job details. Students generally liked Scratch and mentioned some of its weaknesses. The students asked that the experiment be repeated with other modules the following year. Although we have achieved our goals, improvements should be made if this experiment is repeated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Data will be available when asked

References

  • Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the game-design and learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, J., & Damien, D. (2011). An introduction to Serious game - Definitions and concepts. Proceedings of the Serious Games & Simulation Workshop, Paris, 10–15 http//hayka-kultura.com/larsen.html.

  • An, Y. J. (2016). A case study of educational computer game design by middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2010). A case study of educational game design by kids and for kids. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5242–5246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, D., Samur, Y., & Cömert, Z. (2022). The effect of educational game design process on students’ creativity. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00188-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Grove, F., Mechant, P., & Van Looy, J. (2010). Uncharted waters? Exploring experts’ opinions on the opportunities and limitations of serious games for foreign language learning. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games, pp. 107–115, Leuven, Belgium, September 2010.

  • Farber, M. (2020). Global perspectives on Gameful and Playful Teaching and Learning. IGI Global.

  • Greco, M., & Murgia, G. (2007). Improving Negotiation Skills Through an Online Business Game. Proceedings of the European Conference on Game Based Learning. Paisley, UK,. 97–104.

  • Greco, M., Baldissin, N., & Nonino, F. (2013). An exploratory taxonomy of Business Games. SIMULATION & GAMING, 44, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113501464.

  • Grimes, S., & Fields, D. (2015). Children’s media making but not sharing. The potential and limitations of child-specific DIY media websites for a more inclusive media landscape. Media International Australia, 154, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42, 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., & Kanter, D. (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making Games for Learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Computer games for learning. MIT Press.

  • Mayer, R. E. (2020). Cognitive foundations of game-based learning. In J. L. Plass, R. E. Mayer, & B. D. Homer (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 83–110). The MIT Press.

  • Rachman-Moore, D., & Kenett, R. (2006). The Use of Simulation to improve the effectiveness of training in Performance Management. Journal of Management Education, 30(3), 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, D., & Green, L. (2017). Problem solving through digital game design: A quantitative content analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: it’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 16–30, 2006.

  • Vos, N., Van der Meijden, H., & Denessen, E. (2011). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 56, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walfisz, M., Zackariasson, P., & Wilson, T. L. (2006). Real-time strategy: Evolutionary game development. Business Horizons, 49(6), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, R-L. (2022). Engaging future engineers: The case study of a serious game implementation - education and Information Technologies. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11279-y

  • Becker, K. (2017), Choosing and Using Digital Games in the Classroom: A Practical Guide, Calgary : Springer.

  • Khenissi, M-A, Essalmi, F., Jemni, M. (2015). Comparison Between Serious Games and Learning Version of Existing Games. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) 487 – 494.

  • Gamarra, M., Dominguez, A., Velazquez, J., & Páez, H. (2022). A gamification strategy in engineering education—A case study on motivation and engagement. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22466

  • Fabricatore, C., López, X. (2012). Sustainability Learning through Gaming: An Exploratory Study. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 10(2), 209-222.

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is no acknowledgment

Funding

There is no funding

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hedia Mhiri Sellami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There is no competing interest.

Ethics approval

I approve of ethical concepts.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sellami, H.M. Sensitize engineers to serious games via scratch. Educ Inf Technol 29, 11077–11086 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12264-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12264-9

Keywords

Navigation