Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of augmented reality technology on learning behavior and attitudes of preschool students in science activities

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching the complex subject matter of “Exploring Space” necessitates concrete and engaging teaching methods, as it requires students to employ abstract thinking and imagination. An expert team designed and developed Augmented Reality (AR)-based activity schemes for children aged 3–6. A total of 166 preschool students from Ningbo, China, were conveniently sampled to participate in six science activity units. 82 students received AR-based instruction, while 84 were taught using conventional methods. This research employed the “Preschool Learning Behaviors Scale (PLBS)”, “Attitude on Science in School Assessment (ATSSA)”, as well as “Attitude on AR Activities Scale (ARAAS)” to compare the impact of virtual manipulatives based on AR, as well as physical manipulatives on preschool students’ academic accomplishments and attitudes. Outcomes demonstrated that the AR-based science learning system promoted more active learning behaviors and improved learning attitudes. ANOVA analysis verified that AR receptivity remarkably influenced learning attitudes and behaviors, with learning attitudes also remarkably impacting learning behaviors. Furthermore, students exhibited high acceptance of AR technology in science activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Abdüsselam, M. S. (2014). Teachers’ and students’ views on using augmented reality environments in physics education: 11th grade magnetism topic example. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, J. (2022). Generative learning strategies do not diminish primary students’ attitudes towards augmented reality. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10445-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabell, S. Q., DeCoster, J., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Variation in the effectiveness of instructional interactions across preschool classroom settings and learning activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 820–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2014). A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delello, J. A. (2014). Insights from pre-service teachers using science-based augmented reality. Journal of computers in education, 1, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0021-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, X., Vitiello, V. E., Maier, M. F., & Greenfield, D. B. (2010). A longitudinal examination of young children’s learning behavior: Child-level and classroom-level predictors of change throughout the preschool year. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., Iruka, I. U., Ritchie, S., Barbarin, O. A., Winn, D. M. C., Crawford, G. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalón, X. D., & Greenfield, D. (2009). Learning behaviors mediating the effects of behavior problems on academic outcomes. NHSA Dialog, 12(1), 1–17.

  • Gelman, R., & Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0579-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of research in science teaching, 25(8), 689–703.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., & Zulkifli, A. N. (2023). Systematic literature review on critical success factors in implementing augmented reality for science learning environment (2006–2021). Education and Information Technologies, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11613-y

  • Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review, 24, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hinske, S., & Langheinrich, M. (2007). Managing Augmented Toy Environments–A New Perspective for Smart Space Management. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Managing Ubiquitous Communications and Services (MUCS).

  • Hinske S., Langheinrich M., & Lampe M. (2008). Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 78–87).

  • Hong, S. Y., & Diamond, K. E. (2012). Two approaches to teaching young children science concepts, vocabulary, and scientific problem-solving skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D. (2019). Learning sciences research and Pasteur’s quadrant. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küçük, S., Yilmaz, R., Baydas, Ö., & Göktas, Y. (2014). Augmented reality applications attitude scale in secondary schools: Validity and reliability study. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liarokapis, F., & Anderson, E. F. (2010). Using augmented reality as a medium to assist teaching in higher education. In Eurographics 2010 (pp. 9–16). Norrköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. J., Liu, Y. C., Chen, P. J., & Hsieh, M. R. (2020). Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Young children’s motivational beliefs about learning science. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 378–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. A. (1999). National scales of differential learning behaviors among American children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 28(2), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. A., Leigh, N. M., & Perry, M. A. (2002). Development and validation of the preschool learning behaviors scale. Psychology in the Schools, 39(4), 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., Goldman, S., & Varenne, H. (2006). The cultural work of learning disabilities. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. MyEducationLab Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s perceptions of school science. School science review, 84, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2008). Adolescent health services: Missing opportunities.

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayfeld, I., Brenneman, K., & Gelman, R. (2011). Science in the classroom: Finding a balance between autonomous exploration and teacher-led instruction in preschool settings. Early Education & Development, 22(6), 970–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayfeld, I., Fuccillo, J., & Greenfield, D. B. (2013). Executive functions in early learning: Extending the relationship between executive functions and school readiness to science. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2011). Atom surprise: Using theatre in primary science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 508–524.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., Pelatti, C. Y., & Miller, H. L. (2014). Mathematics and science learning opportunities in preschool classrooms. Early Education and Development, 25(4), 445–468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T. (2014). Development and validation of an instrument assessing preschool children's attitude towards science (Doctoral dissertation, [Honolulu]:[University of Hawaii at Manoa],[August 2014]).

  • Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students' achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A., & Rushton, B. S. (2008). Primary-school children's attitudes towards science, engineering and technology and their images of scientists and engineers. Education 3–13, 36(1), 51-67.

  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamburaj, K. P. (2015). Promoting scientific ideas through the future studies in Tamil language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2084–2089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, M. A., Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., & Lun, J. (2011). Effects of a teacher professional development intervention on peer relationships in secondary classrooms. School Psychology Review, 40(3), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, B. (2016). An analyses and Meta-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23–33.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, T. A., Cabell, S. Q., Justice, L. M., Pentimonti, J. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2013). The role of frequent, interactive prekindergarten shared reading in the longitudinal development of language and literacy skills. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Wenqian Zou of Ningbo Childhood Education College, China, for their valuable feedback on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z. conceived the idea; Y.Z. developed the methodology; J.S. performed validation; J.S. wrote the formal assessment; Y.Z. carried out the investigation; Y.Z. provided resources; Y.Z. drafted the original manuscript; J.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript; J.S. supervised the project; J.S. administered the project; all authors read and approved the final edition of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jirarat Sitthiworachart.

Ethics declarations

Institutional review board statement

Not applicable.

Informed consent

All participants gave their informed consent to participate in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhufeng, Y., Sitthiworachart, J. Effect of augmented reality technology on learning behavior and attitudes of preschool students in science activities. Educ Inf Technol 29, 4763–4784 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12012-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12012-z

Keywords

Navigation