Skip to main content
Log in

Development and evaluation of a modular experiential learning curriculum for promoting AI readiness

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information systems are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI). However, AI can be tricked into misbehaving, showing bias, or committing abuse. The root causes of these errors and uncertainties can be hidden away while parallelizing AI algorithms on high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. The project outlined in this paper aims to use artificial intelligence from the ground up to generate teaching materials and curricula for student-teachers. Students embark on a journey of discovery, taking calculated risks in a learning environment. The main purpose of this document is to present the primary research results of the two-year pilot project. A secondary purpose of this paper is to disseminate information about this exciting endeavor to encourage like-minded educators and researchers to participate in this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI). edX. (2023). Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://www.edx.org/course/artificial-intelligence-ai

  • Bornstein, A. M. (2016). Is artificial intelligence permanently inscrutable. Nautilus, 40.

  • Brennen, J. (2018). An industry-led debate: How UK media cover artificial intelligence.

  • Cheong, N. (2022, August). Machine learning algorithms for recommendation of learning CS courses in e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Science and Systems (pp. 136–141).

  • Education.  Google AI. (2023). Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://ai.google/education/

  • Fong, A. C. M., Hong, G., & Fong, B. (2019, December). Augmented intelligence with ontology of semantic objects. In 2019 International Conference on contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  • Fong, A., Gupta, A., Carr, S., Bhattacharjee, S., & Harnar, M. (2022, September). Modular experiential learning for secure, safe, and reliable AI: Curricular Initiative to Promote Education in Trustworthy AI. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 9–15).  Home Page. Transformative interdisciplinary human + ai research group. Retrieved January 20, from https://fong.cs.wmich.edu/

  • Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact (pp. 36–41). FSG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S. A., Kuber, K., Rohian, H., & Woodhead, S. (2021, March). Pillars of program design and delivery: a case study using self-directed, problem-based, and supportive learning. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 205–211).

  • Markdefalco. (n.d.). Microsoft Learn. Overview of the Microsoft AI school. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/shows/ai-show/overview-of-the-microsoft-ai-school

  • National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office (NAIIO) (2021, April 9). Accelerating America’s leadership in Artificial Intelligence. National Artificial Intelligence Initiative. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://www.ai.gov/accelerating-americas-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/

  • Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hu, X., Downie, J. S., Chu, S., & ssK, W. (2022). A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020 (pp. 1–57). Education and Information Technologies.

  • OpenAI (2020, September 2). OpenAI charter. OpenAI. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://openai.com/charter/

  • Partnership on AI. (2023, January 18). Home.  Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://partnershiponai.org/

  • Saeedi, S., Fong, A. C., Mohanty, S. P., Gupta, A. K., & Carr, S. (2021). Consumer artificial intelligence mishaps and mitigation strategies. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 11(3), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Vartiainen, H., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2022). A systematic review of teaching and learning machine learning in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–31.

  • Sulmont, E. L. (2019). Machine learning for end-users: Exploring learning goals and pedagogical content knowledge. McGill University (Canada).

  • Sulmont, E., Patitsas, E., & Cooperstock, J. R. (2019). What is hard about teaching machine learning to non-majors? Insights from classifying instructors’ learning goals. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udacity. (2019a, October 18). Designing our artificial intelligence curriculum.  Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://www.udacity.com/blog/2016/11/artificial-intelligence-curriculum.html

  • Udacity. (2019b, October 18). Designing our artificial intelligence curriculum. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://blog.udacity.com/2016/11/artificial-intelligence-curriculum.html

  • Yang, X., & Liang, J. (2018, February). Machine Learning Online Education Experience for Non-technical People. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1075–1075).

  • Young, R., & Ringenberg, J. (2019, February). Machine learning: An introductory unit of study for secondary education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 1274–1274).

  • Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Available at SSRN 3312874.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under grant no. 2017289.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Kahvazadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahvazadeh, I., Jose, E., Fong, A.C. et al. Development and evaluation of a modular experiential learning curriculum for promoting AI readiness. Educ Inf Technol 29, 3445–3459 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11928-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11928-w

Keywords

Navigation