Abstract
Mobile devices have increased exponentially in the past decades and the rapid development of digital technology has provided rich soil for the growth of mobile learning (m-learning), which is a more convenient means of learning because of no limitations of space and time. Applying the stimulus-organism-response (S–O-R) framework, this study explores how learners experienced flow during m-learning and how their flow experience led to their continuance intentions for m-learning. With an online survey of 270 valid respondents, the model used in this study was validated by the partial least squares method. The results show that two key characteristics of m-learning applications are positively related to flow experience, of which concentration, in particular, rather than perceived enjoyment, plays an important role in continuance intentions. The S–O–R framework offers an overarching way to explore the influences of m-learning application characteristics (stimuli) on learners’ evaluations of their m-learning processes (organisms), which further influence their continuance intentions (responses).
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available on request from the author.
References
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2018). Predicting the success of Twitter in healthcare: A synthesis of perceived quality, usefulness and flow experience by healthcare professionals. Online Information Review, 42(6), 898–922.
Ahmad, N., & Abdulkarim, H. (2019). The impact of flow experience and personality type on the intention to use virtual world. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(12), 1074–1085.
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Acceptance of mobile technologies and M-learning by university students: An empirical investigation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7805–7826.
An, S., Choi, Y., & Lee, C. K. (2021). Virtual travel experience and destination marketing: Effects of sense and information quality on flow and visit intention. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 19, 100492.
Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S.-B., & Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 789–810.
Benlian, A. (2015). Web personalization cues and their differential effects on user assessments of website value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 225–260.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Bigne, E., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited. Journal of Business Research, 115, 403–416.
Brannon Barhorst, J., McLean, G., Shah, E., & Mack, R. (2021). Blending the real world and the virtual world: Exploring the role of flow in augmented reality experiences. Journal of Business Research, 122, 423–436.
Chang, Y. P., & Zhu, D. H. (2012). The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users’ continuance intention to social networking sites in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 995–1001.
Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154, 103910.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods. Sage Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Cuevas, L., Lyu, J., & Lim, H. (2020). Flow matters: Antecedents and outcomes of flow experience in social search on Instagram. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 49–67.
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., Rappa, N. A., & Huang, F. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Computers & Education, 150, 103850.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Dedeke, A. N. (2016). Travel web-site design: Information task-fit, service quality and purchase intention. Tourism Management, 54, 541–554.
Diacopoulos, M. M., & Crompton, H. (2020). A systematic review of mobile learning in social studies. Computers & Education, 154, 103911.
Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2001). Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 177–184.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Friedrich, T., Schlauderer, S., & Overhage, S. (2019). The impact of social commerce feature richness on website stickiness through cognitive and affective factors: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36, 100861.
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2021). Bridging narrative and locality in mobile-based augmented reality educational activities: Effects of semantic coupling on students’ immersion and learning gains. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 145, 102546.
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744.
Guo, Y., Lu, Z., Kuang, H., & Wang, C. (2020). Information avoidance behavior on social network sites: Information irrelevance, overload, and the moderating role of time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102067.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68.
Hsu, C. L., Chang, K. C., Kuo, N. T., & Cheng, Y. S. (2017). The mediating effect of flow experience on social shopping behavior. Information Development, 33(3), 243–256.
Hu, X., Huang, Q., Zhong, X., Davison, R. M., & Zhao, D. (2016). The influence of peer characteristics and technical features of a social shopping website on a consumer’s purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1218–1230.
Huang, H. C., Pham, T. T. L., Wong, M. K., Chiu, H. Y., Yang, Y. H., & Teng, C. I. (2018). How to create flow experience in exergames? Perspective of flow theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1288–1296.
Klimova, B. (2018). Mobile phones and or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1091–1099.
Konuk, F. A. (2019). The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 103–110.
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems, 13(2), 205–223.
Kumar, B. A., & Chand, S. S. (2019). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 471–487.
Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1–12.
Lee, C. H., & Wu, J. J. (2017). Consumer online flow experience: The relationship between utilitarian and hedonic value, satisfaction and unplanned purchase. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(10), 2452–2467.
Lin, J., Lin, S., Turel, O., & Xu, F. (2020). The buffering effect of flow experience on the relationship between overload and social media users’ discontinuance intentions. Telematics and Informatics, 49, 101374.
Liu, C.-C. (2017). A model for exploring players flow experience in online games. Information Technology & People, 30(1), 139–162.
Liu, H., Chu, H., Huang, Q., & Chen, X. (2016). Enhancing the flow experience of consumers in China through interpersonal interaction in social commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 306–314.
Mahfouz, A. Y., Joonas, K., & Opara, E. U. (2020). An overview of and factor analytic approach to flow theory in online contexts. Technology in Society, 61, 101228.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
Mingyue, F., Ndavi, J. W., Qalati, S. A., Huang, L., & Zhengjia, P. (2022). Applying the time continuum model of motivation to explain how major factors affect mobile learning motivation: A comparison of SEM and fsQCA. Online Information Review, 46(6), 1095–1114.
Mutambara, D., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance for STEM education in rural areas. Computers & Education, 160, 104010.
Okai-Ugbaje, S., Ardzejewska, K., & Imran, A. (2022). A mobile learning framework for higher education in resource constrained environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11947–11969.
Parboteeah, D. V., Valacich, J. S., & Wells, J. D. (2009). The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 60–78.
Pelet, J. -É. É., Ettis, S., & Cowart, K. (2017). Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use. Information & Management, 54(1), 115–128.
Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Oluwasola, D. O., Dipeolu, O., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2019). Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging. Computers & Education, 128, 102–112.
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504–516.
Sitar-Taut, D. A., & Mican, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance and use in higher education during social distancing circumstances: An expansion and customization of UTAUT2. Online Information Review, 45(5), 1000–1019.
Tang, J., & Zhang, P. (2020). The impact of atmospheric cues on consumers’ approach and avoidance behavioral intentions in social commerce websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 105729.
Tuncer, I. (2021). The relationship between IT affordance, flow experience, trust, and social commerce intention: An exploration using the S-O-R paradigm. Technology in Society, 65, 101567.
Wang, J., Antonenko, P., & Dawson, K. (2020a). Does visual attention to the instructor in online video affect learning and learner perceptions? An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 146, 103779.
Wang, Z., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2020b). Relationships among boredom proneness, sensation seeking and smartphone addiction among Chinese college students: Mediating roles of pastime, flow experience and self-regulation. Technology in Society, 62, 101319.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Wu, S. (2015). The impacts of technological environments and co-creation experiences on customer participation. Information & Management, 52(4), 468–482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X. Mobile learning application characteristics and learners’ continuance intentions: The role of flow experience. Educ Inf Technol 29, 2259–2275 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11910-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11910-6