Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of an extended-reality interactive learning system in a dance training course

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In regular dance teaching, teachers find it difficult to pay attention to and meet the specific needs of each student. Extended-reality (XR) has the potential to help students get more information to dance learning. This study developed an XR interactive learning system to assist teachers in dance teaching, and explored the impact of XR on the process and results of dance skills. To assess the effectiveness of XR in dance education, a quasi-experiment was designed. Students majoring in preschool education in vocational high school in Hangzhou, China were recruited as research participants. 54 female students were divided into two groups with the same teaching pace, each with 27 students. The experimental group was taught dance lessons using a developed XR interactive learning system, while the control group was taught dance lessons using traditional methods. The experiment lasted for eight weeks and consisted of 16 lessons. Finally, the results indicate that XR has the potential to improve students’ learning performance and facilitate learning interactions in dance learning; to provide real-time personalized feedback to students and improve autonomous learning. Moreover, XR has the potential to enhance learning experience by reducing the cognitive load of students in dance learning. The results of this study is expected to help those considering the use of XR to supplement dance instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The database generated for this study is available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  • Abraham, S., & Connor, K. A. (2020). Work in progress: Leveraging technology trends to develop a skills-based approach to engineering design. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/35669. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  • Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, X., Li, G., Xu, L., & Shi, Y. (2011). A survey on application of virtual reality technology in U.S. military simulation training. Electronics Optics & Control, 18(10), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2011.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, J., Ssin, S. Y., Dorrian, E. J., Neven, A. M., Webb, D. P., Walsh, J. A., Simon, T. M., Irlitti, A., Smith, R. T., Kohler, M., & Thomas, B. H. (2017). Cognitive cost of using augmented reality displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(11), 2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2735098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinghurst, M., Poupyrev, I., Kato, H., & May, R. (2000). Mixing realities in shared space: An augmented reality interface for collaborative computing. Multimedia and Expo, 2000. ICME 2000. 2000 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2000.871085

  • Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (2002). Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock, F., & Pritchard, S. (2020). Psychomotor skill development: Learning what and how to do. In M. Moy, F. Blackstock, & L. Nici (Eds.), Enhancing patient engagement in pulmonary healthcare (pp. 27–40). Respiratory Medicine. Humana. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_3

  • Bogicevic, V., Seo, S., Kandampully, J. A., Liu, S. Q., & Rudd, N. A. (2019). Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: The role of mental imagery. Tourism Management, 74, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case Westem Reserve University. (2015). CWRU, Cleveland Clinic collaborate with Microsoft On mixed-reality technology[EB/OL]. https://thedaily.case.edu/cwru-cleveland-clinic-collaborate-with-microsoft-on-mixed-reality-technology-for-education/. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  • Chan, J. C. P., Leung, H., Tang, J. K. T., & Komura, T. (2011). A virtual reality dance training system using motion capture technology. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(2), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (2021). Effects of virtual reality application on skill learning for optical-fibre fusion splicing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2209–2226. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. J., Xue, C. Q., Chen, M., Tian, J., Shao, J. & Zhang, J.(2017). Quality assessment model of digital interface based on eye-tracking experiments. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), (01), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.01.008

  • Chu, L. Y., Chen, W. D., Tan, Y., & Zheng, S. S. (2019). Rebuliding the experience: Extended Reality (XR) technology and its education application outlook:also discuss the trend of “education and new technology integration.” Journal of Distance Education, 37(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2019.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, B. (2009). Using sensor inputs to affect virtual and real environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2009.60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosier, J. K., Cobb, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science. Computers and Education, 38(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00075-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davcev, D., Trajkovic, V., Kalajdziski, S., & Celakoski, S. (2003). Augmented reality environment for dance learning. In International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education, 2003. Proceedings. ITRE2003. (pp. 189–193). IEEE.

  • Dehn, L. B., Kater, L., Piefke, M., Botsch, M., Driessen, M., & Beblo, T. (2018). Training in a comprehensive everyday-like virtual reality environment compared to computerized cognitive training for patients with depression. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denisova, A., & Cairns, P. (2015). Adaptation in digital games: The effect of challenge adjustment on player performance and experience. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, London, United Kingdom.

  • Dubovi, I., Levy, S. T., & Dagan, E. (2017). Now I know how! the learning process of medication administration among nursing students with non-immersive desktop virtual reality simulation. Computers & Education, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.009

  • Dumont, A., Kadel, N., Brunet, N., Colombie, J. B., Brain, P. L., & Couillandre, A. (2016). Dance and health. Science & Sports, 31(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2016.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L. Y., Hou, S. M., Zhang, K. F., & Liao, X. L. (2021). Review on the hot spots of extended reality(XR) in 2020. Science & Technology Review, 01, 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. G., Srensen, S. M. D., Konge, L., Svendsen, M. B. S., Nobel-Jrgensen, M., & Bjerrum, F., et al. (2020). Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy (3), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06887-8

  • Gao, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Application of posture recognition service system based on information fusion smart sensor in dance training. Journal of Sensors, (4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4284249

  • Guo, Y., & Tian, Y. Q. (2020). A review of research on infant dance teaching in China from 2009 to 2018. Survey of Education, 9(8), P.14-16,21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrow, A. J., & Simpson, E. J. (1989). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Shang Hai: East China Normal University Press

  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA - TLE( Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload North Holland (pp. 139–183). Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, M., Mann, D., Farrow, D., & Nielsen, T. (2011). Does visual-perceptual training augment the fielding performance of skilled cricketers? International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.6.4.523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. B., & Huang, R. H. (2016). Learning experience in smart learning environment: definition, elements and scale. e-Education Research, (12), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2016.12.009

  • Huang, R. H., Yang, J. F., & Hu, Y. B. (2012a). From digital learning environments to smart learning environments. Open Education Research, 18(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. Y., Hogg, J., Zandieh, S., & Bostwick, S. B. (2012b). A ballroom dance classroom program promotes moderate to vigorous physical activity in elementary school children. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.090625-QUAN-203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. (2020). Influence of students’ learning style, sense of presence, and cognitive load on learning outcomes in an immersive virtual reality learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G., Yang, L., & Wang, S. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers and Education, 69, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017). Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 106, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, W. Y., Zhu, X. H., & Chen, C. (2007). Research progress of virtual tourism. Science & Technology Review, 14, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2007.14.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzo, J. A., Valentine, A., Sohel, F., Yapp, A. Y. T., Muparadzi, K. C., & Abdelmalek, M. (2020). A review of the uses of virtual reality in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(3), 748–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2278–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. J. C., Tidman, S. J., Lay, B. S., Bourke, P. D., Lloyd, D. G., & Alderson, J. A. (2013). Visual search differs but not reaction time when intercepting a 3D versus 2D videoed opponent. Journal of Motor Behavior, 45(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.760512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, Wil M. P. (2016;2018). Scalable process discovery and conformance checking. Software and Systems Modeling, 17(2), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0545-x

  • Liu, G. P., & Gao, N. (2021). Mechanisms of gestural interaction virtual experiments on learning experience. Modern Distance Education Research, 33(2), 22-32 + 72. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2021.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, G., Lledó, A., Pomares, J., & Roig, R. (2016). Design and application of an immersive virtual reality system to enhance emotional skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Computers & Education, 98, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manganaro, M. S., Morag, Y., Weadock, W. J., Yablon, C. M., Gaetke-Udager, K., & Stein, E. B. (2017). Creating three-dimensional printed models of acetabular fractures for use as educational tools. Radiographics, 37(3), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., Furness, T., Yuan, Y., Iorio, J., & Wang, Z. (2018). All reality: virtual, augmented, mixed (x), mediated (x,y), and multimediated reality. Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.08386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C. C., Chen, C. H., & Sun, C. C. (2017). Impact of an augmented reality system on learning for army military decision-making process (MDMP) course. In Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations, July 27–31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA (pp. 663–671). Springer International Publishing.

  • Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintah, E. K. (2014). Using group method of teaching to address the problem of large class size: An action research. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v4i2.5707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mott, K. (2019). State classification of cooking objects using a vgg cnn. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.12613

  • Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Umemoto, K., & Sasaki, K. (1998). Three tales of knowledge-creating companies. Knowing in firms: Understanding, managing, and measuring knowledge. 1998, 146–172.

  • Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H. C., Zhao, J. B., & Yan, B. H. (2022). Is technology enabling learning? -The impact of learners’ use of technology on the learning experience. Open Education Research, 28(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2022.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualcomm. (2017). The mobile future of extended reality (p. 4). Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadijanti, N., Fahrul, H. F., & Pangestu, D. M. (2016). Basic dance pose applications using kinect technology. 2016 International Conference on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing (KCIC). IEEE.

  • Salisbury, J. P., Keshav, N. U., Sossong, A. D., & Sahin, N. T. (2018). Concussion assessment with smartglasses: validation study of balance measurement toward a lightweight, multimodal, field-ready platform. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8478

  • Senecal, S., Nijdam, N. A., Aristidou, A., & Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2020). Salsa dance learning evaluation and motion analysis in gamified virtual reality environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(33–34), 24621–24643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09192-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. E. (2020). Applying the science of learning to the teaching and learning of surgical skills: The basics of surgical education. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 122(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G. Y., Chen, W. J., & Sun, Q. J. (2018). Research on a Dance training system based on VR. Journal of Communication University of China (Natural Science), (5), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.16196/j.cnki.issn.1673-4793.2018.05.003

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on leaming. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

  • Tan, Y., & Yuan, Q. J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and its application and perspectives in information systems research. Journal of Modern Information, 39(12), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, F., Fortenberry, B., Aisaka, K., & Movellan, J. R. (2005). Plans for Developing Real-time Dance Interaction between QRIO and Toddlers in a Classroom Environment. Proceedings of 2005 4th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/devlrn.2005.1490963

  • Thompson, A., & Potter, L. E. (2017). Proposing augmentation of live sporting events with gamification and social sharing. In Paper presented at the 29th Australian conference on computer-human interaction, Brisbane, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156174

  • Van Ginkela, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., Noroozi, O., Roozen, M., Bos, T., van Tilborg, R., van Halteren, M., & Mulder, M. (2019). Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Computers & Education, 134, 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review, 147–177. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23363899. Accessed 20 Jan 2023

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignais, N., Bideau, B., Craig, C., Brault, S., Multon, F., Delamarche, P., & Kulpa, R. (2009). Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goalkeeper’s motor response? Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 8(4), 501–508. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3761546/. Accessed 16 Jan 2023

  • Wang, W. P., & Li, W. (2020). Regional differences in online learning experiences of Chinese college students and the factors affecting them-analysis based on survey data from 334 universities in China. Open Education Research, 26(06), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2020.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Li, H., & Wei, X. R. (2022). Digital transformation in education: International context, development needs and promotion path. Distance Education in China, (7), 9. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.07.009

  • Xu, J. J., Tian, Y., Gao, B. Y., Zhuang, R. X., & Yang, L. (2018). Research on learner satisfaction based on learning experience in smart classroom. Modern Educational Technology, 09, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Leung, H., Yue, L., & Deng, L. (2013). Generating a two-phase lesson for guiding beginners to learn basic dance movements. Computers and Education, 61(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R. M. (2016). Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., & Lin, G. R. (2022). Digital technology for quality postgraduate education: what is possible and what can be done. China Higher Education Research, 351(11), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2022.11.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakariya, Q., Arafat, A. M., & Buket, D. B. (2017). Deep convolutional neural network for age estimation based on VGG-Face model. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.01664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatoń, K., & Szczepan, S. (2014). The impact of immediate verbal feedback on the improvement of swimming technique. Journal of Human Kinetics, 41(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W., & Li, Y. (2022). Kinect-based human pose estimation optimization and animation generation. Journal of Computer Applications, 1-9[2022-02-02]. https://doi.org/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2021061043

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported the financial supports by National Science Foundation Youth Foundation of China “Research on Supporting Mechanism and Model Construction of Process Mining Technology for Teaching Decision-making in Online Sharing Regulation” Grant/Award Number: 62207026 and Higher Education "Fourteen Fifth" Teaching Reform Project in Zhejiang Province “Research and practice on the reform of evidence-based performance evaluation of AI technology” Grant/Award Number: jg20220101.

Funding

This work was supported by the [National Science Foundation Youth Foundation] under [Grant number 62207026], and the [Higher Education "Fourteen Fifth" Teaching Reform Project in Zhejiang Province] under [Grant number jg20220101].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Educational Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Wei Xu, Qian-Wen Xing, Jing-Dong Zhu & Xiao Liu

  2. Zhejiang Vocational and Technical College of Communications, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Pin-Nv Jin

Authors
  1. Wei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qian-Wen Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing-Dong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pin-Nv Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Wei Xu and Qian-Wen Xing designed and carried out the research and conducted the data analysis and summary. Jing-Dong Zhu and Xiao Liu conducted the research, and Pin-Nv Jin participated in the data analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was carried out without ethics issue.

Consent to participate

All participants gave their consent for participation.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Xing, QW., Zhu, JD. et al. Effectiveness of an extended-reality interactive learning system in a dance training course. Educ Inf Technol 28, 16637–16667 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11883-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11883-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation