Abstract
Together with the developments in online learning field, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have attracted significant attention both in developed and developing countries in recent years. Although online learning readiness (OLR) of learners has been investigated comprehensively in online learning contexts, and several instruments have been developed to measure OLR, this variable has been undervalued in MOOC contexts, and little is known about OLR in MOOCs. For this reason, the purpose of this mixed methods study is to investigate and conceptualize OLR in MOOCs. Particularly, this study aims to examine readiness for online learning in a MOOC context, to investigate the effect of OLR on MOOC completion, and to identify factors contributing to learners’ OLR for conceptualizing OLR in MOOCs. The number of participants is 8974 for the quantitative stage and 141 for the qualitative stage. The data were collected using the OLR Scale, system logs, and open-ended question. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that Bilgeİş MOOC learners have high levels of OLR, and MOOC completion was significantly associated with only the self-directed learning dimension of OLR. In addition, the qualitative results revealed whether learners felt ready for online learning. The main reason why they were ready for online learning was learners’ previous online or distance learning experience, and the main reason why they were not ready for online learning was having a bias against online learning. The qualitative results also revealed ten indicators which can be used for conceptualizing OLR in MOOCs. The results of this study can be very relevant for the field, and the arguments made might be important for enhancing the effectiveness and success of MOOCs. Particularly, the results obtained from this research are expected to provide important information and recommendations to MOOC practitioners and researchers who would like to study OLR in MOOCs or to develop new perspectives regarding OLR in MOOCs. Also, the results provide essential input for practitioners and researchers studying OLR and could open the way for future studies regarding OLR in MOOCs to support MOOC learners in their online learning journey.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The anonymized datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
References
Agonács, N., Matos, J. F., Bartalesi-Graf, D., & O’Steen, D. N. (2020). Are you ready? Self-determined learning readiness of language MOOC learners. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10017-1
Alshammari, S. H. (2022). Examining students’ readiness for MOOCs: Applying a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 5(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.284
Bayrak, F. (2022). Associations between university students’ online learning preferences, readiness, and satisfaction. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.011
Bergh D. (2015). Chi-squared test of fit and sample size-A comparison between a random sample approach and a chi-square value adjustment method. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(2). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26075668
Blayone, T. (2018). Reexamining digital-learning readiness in higher education: Positioning digital competencies as key factors and a profile application as a readiness tool. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(4), 425–451. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/178285
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25. https://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf
Çebi, A. (2022). How e-learning readiness and motivation affect student interactions in distance learning? Education and Information Technologies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11312-0.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2015). The exploration of models regarding e-learning readiness: Reference model suggestions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1). https://ijpe.inased.org/makale/2420
Demir-Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792–1797. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017736.pdf
Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.565496
Essex C, Cagiltay K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from “distressed” students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233-239. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92785
Celik, B. (2020). An examination of presage, process and product dimensions in massive open online courses [Doctoral thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/69117
Farid, A. (2014). Student online readiness assessment tools: A systematic review approach. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(4), 375–382. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1035667.pdf
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
Firat, M., & Bozkurt, A. (2020). Variables affecting online learning readiness in an open and distance learning university. Educational Media International, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1786772.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gameel, B. G. (2016). ICTs readiness among MOOC learners: A cross-national analysis [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e- learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00102.x
Horzum, M. B., Kaymak, Z. D., & Gungoren, O. C. (2015). Structural equation modeling towards online learning readiness, academic motivations, and perceived learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.3.2410
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
İliç, U. (2022). The impact of ICT instruction on online learning readiness of pre-service teachers. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1007868
Joosten, T., & Cusatis, R. (2020). Online learning readiness. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(3), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1726167
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087.
Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
Korkmaz, S. (2022). To what extent are preparatory school students ready for online learning? Journal of theoretical educational. Science, 15(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.991017
Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
Liu, J. C. (2019). Evaluating online learning orientation design with a readiness scale. Online Learning, 23(4), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2078
Liu, J. C., & Kaye, E. R. (2016). Preparing online learning readiness with learner- content interaction: Design for scaffolding self-regulated learning. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli, & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses (pp. 216–243). IGI Global.
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802395771
Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
Morris, N. P., Hotchkiss, S., & Swinnerton, B. (2015). Can demographic information predict MOOC learner outcomes? In Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, (pp. 199–207). https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86184
Park, Y., Jung, I., & Reeves, T. C. (2015). Learning from MOOCs: A qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives. Educational Media International, 52(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053286
Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e- learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002
Pham, L. T., & Dau, T. K. T. (2022). Online learning readiness and online learning system success in Vietnamese higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2021-0044.
Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131
Şahin, M., Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2020). Sequential analysis of online learning behaviors according to e-learning readiness. In P. Isaias, D. G. Sampson, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Online teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 117–131). Springer.
Schulze, A. S. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) and completion rates: Are self-directed adult learners the most successful at MOOCs? [Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University]. Pepperdine Digital Commons.
Shah, D. (2021). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2021. Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2021
Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning? International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85–95 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ450434
Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303043
T Subramaniam, T., Suhaimi, N. A. D., Latif, L. A., Abu Kassim, Z., & Fadzil, M. (2019). MOOCs readiness. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.3913.
Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143
Vonderwell, S., & Savery, J. (2004). Online learning: Student role and readiness. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 3(3), 38–42. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101894.pdf
Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self- regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Watkins, R., Leigh, D., & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2004.tb00321.x
Wei, H. C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: Do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
Yu, T., & Richardson, J. (2015). An exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the student online learning readiness (SOLR) instrument. Online Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i5.593.
Yukselturk, E., Ozekes, S., & Türel, Y. K. (2014). Predicting dropout student: An application of data mining methods in an online education program. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 17(1), 118–133. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017900.pdf
Yurdugül, H., & Demir, Ö. (2017). Öğretmen yetiştiren lisans programlarındaki öğretmen adaylarının e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluklarının incelenmesi: Hacettepe üniversitesi örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(4), 896–915. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016022763
Yurdugül, H., & Sırakaya, D. A. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenme hazır bulunuşluluk ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169). http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2420
Acknowledgements
This article is derived from a dissertation by the first author entittled “An examination of presage, process and product dimensions in massive open online courses”. Submitted to Middle East Technical University, September 2020. Author: Berkan Celik, Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Kursat Cagiltay.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Necessary ethical approval was obtained from the Applied Ethics Research Center of the researchers’ university.
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
There is no conflict of interest among authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Celik, B., Cagiltay, K. The undervalued variable in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) research: An analysis and conceptualization of readiness for online learning in MOOCs. Educ Inf Technol 28, 11569–11588 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11662-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11662-3