Skip to main content

Does a flipped classroom model work in mathematics education? A meta-analysis

An Author Correction to this article was published on 30 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The design of the flipped classroom (FC) as a pedagogical approach is becoming increasingly prevalent in mathematics education. However, although many studies have been conducted on whether FCs are more effective in improving mathematics achievement compared to traditional lectures, the results are not consistent. To address this issue, this meta-analysis examined the overall effect of flipped mathematics classrooms on student achievement, in addition to a set of moderating variables. Our analysis included thirty-seven experimental studies with forty effect sizes, comparing flipped and traditional classrooms in K-12 and tertiary mathematics education. The meta-analysis revealed an overall statistically significant FC effect of g = 0.402, indicating a marginally moderate effect size. The effect sizes were also significantly moderated by education level and mathematics content area. No evidence of publication bias was found in the data set. We concluded by discussing employment of the FC model in the contexts of mathematics education and offering suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Change history

References

  • Akyuz, G., & Berberoglu, G. (2010). Teacher and classroom characteristics and their relations to mathematics achievement of the students in the TIMSS. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science (2006). The critical nature of Mathematical Sciences. Retrieved March 1, 2020, from https://review.ms.unimelb.edu.au/FullReport2006.pdf.

  • Baki, A. (2018). Mathematics teaching knowledge. PegemA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, M. (2014). Blended and flipped: Exploring new models for effective teaching and learning. Faculty focus (Special Report). Magna Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Internal Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Chen, T. L., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, M. (2021). A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10394-y

  • Fredriksen, H., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2020). An activity theory perspective on contradictions in flipped mathematics classrooms at the university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1591533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Sampson, D. (2018). Putting flipped classroom into practice: A comprehensive review of empirical research. In D. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, J. Spector, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Digital technologies: sustainable innovations for improving teaching and learning. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73417-0_2

  • Hartyányi, M., Balassa, S., Babócsy, C., Téringer, A., Ekert, S., Coakley, D., ... & Jiménez García, E. (2018). Innovating Vocational Education: Flipped classroom in practice. Retrieved from http://mek.oszk.hu/19700/19778/19778.pdf.

  • Hornik, S., & Tupchiy, A. (2006). Culture's impact on technology mediated learning: The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishak, T., Kurniawan, R., Zainuddin, Z., & Keumala, C. M. (2020). The role of pre-class asynchronous online video lectures in flipped-class instruction: Identifying students’ perceived need satisfaction. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.v4i1.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. L., Holt, E. A., Sowards, J. B., Ogden, T. H., & West, R. E. (2018). Investigating strategies for pre-class content learning in a flipped classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagol, İ., & Esen, E. (2019). The effect of flipped learning approach on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(3), 708–727. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindle, J., & Gentimis, T. (2018). Florida poly primers: Calculus. PRIMUS, 28(7), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1388320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis, AERA Open, 5(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahann, P., & Lambdin, D. V. (2020). Collaborative learning in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littel, H. J., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Načinović-Braje, I., Klindžić, M., & Galetić, L. (2019). The role of individual variable pay in a collectivistic culture society: An evaluation. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 1352–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nortvedt, G. A., Gustafsson, J. E., & Lehre, A. C. W. (2016). The importance of instructional quality for the relation between achievement in reading and mathematics. In T. Quality (Ed.), Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes (pp. 97–113). Springer, Cham.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, L. (2015). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom in college algebra. PRIMUS, 25(9-10), 782–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., & Zurawsky, C. (2003). Class size: Counting students can count. American Educational Research Association, 1(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sagenmüller, I. (2020). Six types of flipped classroom to innovate in higher education. Retrieved January 03, 2020, from https://www.u-planner.com/en-us/blog/flipped-classroom-six-types.

  • Shambaugh, N. (2020). Questioning Prompts to examine blended PK-20 learning environments. In Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Nur-Awaleh, M. A. (Eds.), Emerging Techniques and Applications for Blended Learning in K-20 Classrooms (pp. 1-20). IGI Global. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0242-6.ch001

  • Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. A. (2007). The effect of personal and epistemological beliefs on performance in a college developmental mathematics class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University. Retrieved February 01, 2020, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/5164383.pdf.

  • Sterne, J. A., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol., 54(10), 1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F., Hart, J. B., & Bleiler, S. K. (2015). Fostering instructor knowledge of student thinking using the flipped classroom. PRIMUS, 25(8), 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020a). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

  • Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020b). Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., Yue, W. G., & Fu, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 4(4), 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm.

  • Thompson, C. J., & McCann, P. (2010). Redesigning college algebra for student retention: Results of a quasi-experimental research study. MathAMATYC Educator, 2(1), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, L., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics. teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE—Life Sciences. Education, 14(3), ar26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Further reading (studies that are included in the meta analysis)

Download references

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Güler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güler, M., Kokoç, M. & Önder Bütüner, S. Does a flipped classroom model work in mathematics education? A meta-analysis. Educ Inf Technol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11143-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11143-z

Keywords

  • Flipped classroom
  • Mathematics achievement
  • Meta-analysis
  • Moderator analysis