Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of course outcome attainment of engineering course with traditional, blended and flipped classroom approaches

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With development in technologies in educational and industrial sectors students are facing strenuous competitions. Job offers around the world fixate on recruiting suitable graduates with skills, knowledge and problem solving skills. For assuring the learners attainment of cognitive, psychometric and affective levels, Outcome based education (OBE) measures each and every aspect of assessment done by the students from Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, India. In this paper a methodological evaluation is done on course outcome (CO) of students learned using different approaches are studied. Based on the result, the introduction of teaching aids in form of digital tools has positive influence over CO attainment. However, adaptability of different approaches was found be difficult for some of student diverse and resulted in decrease in CO attainment % levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 1–22.

  • Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S. N., Kondo, H., Ohnishi, Y., & Nishino, K. (2019). Analysis of learning activities and effects on blended lectures. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 1568–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodeir, L. M. (2018). Blended learning methods as an approach to teaching project management to architecture students. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3899–3905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yigit, T., Koyun, A., Yuksel, A. S., & Cankaya, I. A. (2014). Evaluation of blended learning approach in computer engineering education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 807–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kälberer, N., Petendra, B., Böhmer, C., Schibelbein, A., & Beck-Meuth, E. M. (2016). Evaluation process and quality management in a blended-learning bachelor’s programme. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, C. M., Thamilvanan, G., & Mohanasundaram, K. (2019). Influence of activity based assessment in outcome-based education. Test engineering and management, 81, 4524–4528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Vivek.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

R

Rural based students.

U

Urban based Students.

RWDT

Rural students with access to digital tools.

RWODT

Rural students without access to digital tools.

UWDT

Urban students with access to digital tools.

UWODT

Urban students without access to digital tools.

WDT

Students with access to digital tools.

WODT

Students without access to digital tools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivek, C.M., Ramkumar, P. Evaluation of course outcome attainment of engineering course with traditional, blended and flipped classroom approaches. Educ Inf Technol 26, 2225–2231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10353-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10353-7

Keywords

Navigation