Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An exploration into EFL learners’ writing skills via mobile-based dynamic assessment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilizing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design explored the impact of mobile-based dynamic assessment (MDA) on EFL learners’ writing skills. Three intact classes (N = 30), including intermediate EFL learners attending a private English language school in Iran, participated in this study. They were evenly divided into two experimental and one control groups. The DIALNG online diagnostic test was used to assess the participants’ written proficiency and also as an instrument to collect the pre-and post-test scores. During the treatment sessions, the students were required to complete writing tasks over their Google Docs mobile app shared with the instructor. She provided text- and voice-based mediations to the experimental groups following an interactionist DA using both WhatsApp and Google Docs. Follow-up interviews were conducted to assess the experimental groups’ perceptions towards each mediation type. T-test and ANOVA along with the thematic analysis were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The findings showed that only the text group’s post-test scores significantly improved and there was a significant difference among the three groups in their post-test scores which indicated outperformance of the voice group. The overall results showed that MDA enhances EFL learners’ written proficiency as a result of the collaborations between the learners and the instructor using text and voice-based mediation. The thematic analysis of data revealed the participants’ satisfaction with both mediation types in terms of being efficient, convenient, and causing less social pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour, E., Atai, M. R., & Maftoon, P. (2020). The effect of Scaffolded written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ writing quality: An activity theory perspective. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 8(30, special issue), 177-196. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_671067.html

  • Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University.)

  • Alhamami, M. (2016). Vocabulary learning through audios, images, and videos: Linking technologies with memory. CALL-EJ, 17(2), 87–112. http://callej.org/journal/17-2/Alhamami2016.pdf

  • Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. http://www.Jstor.org/stable/328585.

  • Andujar, A. (2020). Mobile-mediated dynamic assessment: A new perspective for second language development. ReCALL, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000247.

  • Arifani, Y. (2019). The application of small WhatsApp groups and the individual flipped instruction model to boost EFL learners’ mastery of collocation. CALL-EJ 20(1). 52–73. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2b0/7939357179824a8159f5955e85c352cb3edb.pdf

  • Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ ZPD modification through computerized-group dynamic assessment of Reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1286350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakla, A. (2019). A mixed-methods study of tailor-made animated cartoons in teaching punctuation in EFL writing. ReCALL, 31(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakowa, J. (2018). Enhancing beginners’ second language learning through an informal online environment. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W. C., Liao, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Improving children’s textual cohesion and writing attitude in a game-based writing environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1671459.

  • Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2008). Utilizing technology in language assessment. Encyclopedia of language and education, 7, 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills: Theory to practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

  • Chen, C. M., Liu, H., & Huang, H. B. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL, 31(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan, F., Rezvani, R., & Fazeli, S. (2017). Social networks and their effectiveness in learning foreign language vocabulary: A comparative study using WhatsApp. CALL-EJ, 18(2), 1–13. http://callej.org/journal/18-2/Dehghan-Rezvani-Fazeli2017.pdf

  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

  • Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 617–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, L. (2014). Reading writing interfaces: From the digital to the book-bound. University of Minnesota Press.

  • García Botero, G., Questier, F., & Zhu, C. (2019). Self-directed language learning in a mobile-assisted, out-of-class context: Do students walk the talk? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1485707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C., Al Zidjaly, N., & Tovares, A. V. (2017). Mobile phones as cultural tools for identity construction among college students in Oman, Ukraine, and the US. Discourse, Context & Media, 17, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Y. C. (2020). Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources. ReCALL, 32(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of Mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.649485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1542407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using Mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imathiu, S. (2018). Use of Web 2.0 technologies as mediation tools in higher education with focus on YouTube. Current Research of Journal Social Sciences & Humanities, 1(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRJSSH.1.1.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in Mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150, 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkovič, V. (2019). Online informal learning of English through smartphones in Slovenia. System, 80, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kılıçkaya, F. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of collaborative digital graphic writing based on semantic mapping. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, M. H. (2019). Students’ reactions to using smartphones and social Media for Vocabulary Feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 920–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will Mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H., & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution: Implications for language pedagogy. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, (pp. 217-233). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lai, C., & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of Mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i1.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2–3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.767616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

  • Lantolf, J., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 207–226). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. (2019). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2020). A study of adolescent English learners’ cognitive engagement in writing while using an automated content feedback system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., & Roshan, S. (2019). The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V., Liu, G. Z., & Chen, N. S. (2020). The effects of an augmented-reality ubiquitous writing application: A comparative pilot project for enhancing EFL writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770291.

  • Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323.

  • Liu, S., & Kunnan, A. J. (2016). Investigating the application of automated writing evaluation to Chinese undergraduate English majors: A case study of “WriteToLearn”. CALICO Journal, 33(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.26380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, J. G., Royo, T. M., Laborda, J. G., & Calvo, F. G. (2009). Methods of adapting digital content for the learning process via mobile devices. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2673–2677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q. (2017). A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: A socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., & Yodkamlue, B. (2019). The effects of using a self-developed Mobile app on vocabulary learning and retention among EFL learners. PASAA, 58. 166–205. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1227379.pdf

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

  • Mehri Kamrood, A., Davoudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2019). Diagnosing L2 learners’ development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1645181.

  • Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero Perez, M. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through viewing video: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition., 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000706.

  • Negretti, R., & Mežek, Š. (2019). Participatory appropriation as a pathway to self-regulation in academic writing: The case of three BA essay writers in literature. Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. X. L. (2016). Applying computer-mediated collaborative learning into English foreign language classrooms at a Vietnamese university. (Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Newcastle, Australia).

  • Nguyen, T. H., Hwang, W. Y., Pham, X. L., & Pham, T. (2020). Self-experienced storytelling in an authentic context to facilitate EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744665.

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. Basic Books.

  • Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. Springer.

  • Penfield, J. (1987). The media: Catalysts for communicative language learning. Addison-Wesley.

  • Phillips, M. (2016). Digital technology, schools and teachers’ workplace learning: Policy, practice and identity. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of advanced L2 learners of French. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA).

  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M. E., Davin, K. J., & Lantolf, P. J. (2017). Dynamic assessment. In language testing and assessment. In Shohamy et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 243–256). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. R., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezanali, N., & Faez, F. (2019). Vocabulary learning and retention through multimedia glossing. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 105–124. 10125/44685.

  • Rashidi, N., & Bahadori Nejad, Z. (2018). An investigation into the effect of dynamic assessment on the EFL learners’ process writing development. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassaei, E. (2020). Effects of mobile-mediated dynamic and non-dynamic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning: A sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and methods. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Rezaee, A. A., Alavi, S. M., & Razzaghifard, P. (2019). The impact of mobile-based dynamic assessment on improving EFL oral accuracy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3091–3105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09915-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge.

  • Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: a user evaluation of the Busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1456465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saricaoglu, A. (2019). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal explanations. ReCALL, 31(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401800006X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2019). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164.

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating Mobile devices with teaching and learning on Students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2008). Mediating technologies and second language learning. In Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 417–449). Routledge.

  • Trinder, J. (2007). Mobile technologies and systems. In Mobile learning (pp. 23–40). Routledge.

  • Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Exploring EFL learners’ developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-face and computer-mediated dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1698616.

  • Vakili, S., Ebadi, S., & Popescu, M. (2019). Investigating contextual effects on Iranian EFL learners’ mediation and reciprocity in academic writing. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1571289. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1571289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). In R. W. Rieber (Ed.). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 5, Child psychology. Plenum.

  • Walters, J. L. (2012). English language learners’ reading self-efficacy and achievement using 1: 1 mobile learning devices (Doctoral Dissertation, UC San Diego).

  • Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on CALL. In J. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 41–51). Lawrence Earlbaum.

  • Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2019). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882.

  • Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). Measuring and supporting second language development using computerized dynamic assessment. Language and sociocultural theory, 6(SpecialIssue1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31710.

  • Zhang, D., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1662455.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Ebadi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1 (guiding questions)

  1. 1.

    What aspects of this experience did you enjoy most?

  2. 2.

    What obstacles did you face during this experience?

  3. 3.

    What are your suggestions for improving this kind of instruction and feedback provision?

  4. 4.

    Did your opinions towards this learning experience change over the sessions? Give examples.

Appendix 2 (writing tasks prompts)

  1. 1.

    The best holiday ever (Write about a holiday that you went on that was really important to you. Say where you went and what you saw, and explain why it was the best holiday you ever had.)

  2. 2.

    An important person in my life (Write about a person who has had an important influence on you. Describe the person, explain how they influenced you, and why they have been important in your life.)

  3. 3.

    The purpose of television (You have had a class discussion on the purpose of television. Now your teacher has asked you to write a composition answering the following question: Television entertains, but can it also educate? Write your composition.)

  4. 4.

    Learning a new language. (Is learning to speak a foreign language as important these days as it was in the past? Write an essay giving your opinion.)

  5. 5.

    Health or wealth? (You have recently had a class discussion about the importance of taking care of your health. Now your English teacher has asked you to write an essay giving your opinions on the following statement: It is more important to be healthy than to be rich. Write your essay.)

  6. 6.

    A walk in the park (Your teacher has asked you to write a story. Your story must start with these words: “Sue was walking in the park, when something unusual happened.”)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebadi, S., Bashir, S. An exploration into EFL learners’ writing skills via mobile-based dynamic assessment. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1995–2016 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10348-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10348-4

Keywords

Navigation