Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dealing with conflict in learning teams immersed in technology-rich environments: A mixed-methods study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the nature of conflict and the role that it plays in the dynamics of teamwork has the potential to improve group processes and make teams more successful. This research study investigates how learning teams deal with conflict in technology-rich environments using a mixed-method research approach. In regard to the study’s quantitative component, a correlational study was conducted. The participants were 28 graduate students enrolled in a team-based, graduate-level course at a large university in the Midwestern United States. The findings showed that perceptions of conflict evolve over time, moving from less favorable views to more constructive ones. Perceptions of successful teamwork progressed from focusing on the tasks at hand to investing on fulfilled working relationships. Teams used different modes of conflict management throughout the study. Generally, they evolved from less cooperative to more integrative forms of conflict management which supported collaborative learning. Students who were less proficient in the use of technology generally perceived conflict as having negative effects on the project’s outcomes. More proficient users, on the contrary, tended to perceive conflict as having a positive influence on their teamwork.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andriessen, J. (2003). Working with groupware: Understanding and evaluating collaboration technology. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 437–446). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, A.-P. (2008). Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, A.-P., Karpova, E. & Baran, E. (2008). Trust building in virtual learning teams. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 31st Annual Proceedings of AECT Selected Papers on the Practice of Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 246–249). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. London: Yale University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duque Reis, R. C., Isotani, S., Lopes Rodriguez, C., Takayama Lyra, K., Augustin Jaques, P., & Ibert Bittencourt, I. (2018). Affective states in computer-supported collaborative learning: Studying the past to drive the future. Computers & Education, 120, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, E. (1996). Computer supported cooperative work: The bargaining aspect. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, A., & Cooke, L. (2006). Exploring the attitudes and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobman, E., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33(4), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, A. (2008). Introducing a collaborative technology strategy for higher education students: Recommendations and the way forward. Education and Information Technologies, 13(3), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. De Dreu & E. Van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 87–100). Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Stanne, M. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A., & Montoya-Weiss, M. (2003). Perceptions of task-technology fit in global virtual teams. Working paper. Bloomington: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, S. A. (2003). Strategies to prevent and reduce conflict in college classrooms. College Teaching, 51(3), 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murningham, J., & Conlon, D. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M., & Lonne, B. (2006). An innovative use of the web to build graduate team skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., Holmes, M., & Desanctis, G. (1991). Conflict Management in a Computer-Supported Meeting Environment. Management Science, 37(8), 926–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prapinpongsakom, S., Suwannatthachot, P., & Vicheanpanya, J. (2017). Building a learning community among faculty, librarians and students using computer-supported collaborative learning: An activity theory approach. 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kanazawa, Japan, 9–10 Nov. 2017.

  • Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J., Alcordo, T., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., Monplaisir, L., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. (2003). Context, task and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 239–264). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. J., & Dempsey, C. J. (2008). Conflict resolution in team teaching: A case study in interdisciplinary teaching. College Teaching, 56(3), 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemon, D., Becker, F., Eckardt, L., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2019). One for all and all for one - towards a framework for collaboration support systems. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1837–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 651–717). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Perez, L. (2003). Constructive conflict: How controversy can contribute to school improvement. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 782–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longaretti, L., & Wilson, J. (2006). The impact of perceptions on conflict management. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(4), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S., Coutant-Sassic, D., & Wong, F. (1993). Toward a more balanced view of conflict: There is a positive side. In S. Worchel & J. Simpson (Eds.), Conflict between people & groups: Causes, processes and resolutions (pp. 76–89). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Studies, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, 301F Ramseyer Hall, 29 W. Woodruff Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Ana-Paula Correia

Authors
  1. Ana-Paula Correia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Paula Correia.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Correia, AP. Dealing with conflict in learning teams immersed in technology-rich environments: A mixed-methods study. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2049–2071 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10038-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10038-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation