Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006.
Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2000). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Knowledge and communities, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7293-1.50010-x.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship, situated cognition and social interaction. Bolt Beranek and Newman.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
Cabielles-Hernandez, D., Perez-Perez, J.-R., Paule-Ruiz, M., & Fernandez-Fernandez, S. (2017). Specialized intervention using tablet devices for communication deficits in children with autism Spectrum disorders. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2016.2559482.
Carr, J. (2012). Does math achievement h’APP’en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of information Technology Education: Research, 11, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.28945/1725.
Cheng, P.-H., Yang, Y.-T. C., Chang, S.-H. G., & Kuo, F.-R. R. (2016). 5E Mobile inquiry learning approach for enhancing learning motivation and scientific inquiry ability of university students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2015.2467352.
Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7, 2012.
Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. The self in transition: Infancy to childhood, 8, 61–97.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43-78).
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.013.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16.
Ditzler, C., Hong, E., & Strudler, N. (2016). How tablets are utilized in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1172444.
Donovan, L., Green, T., & Hartley, K. (2010). An examination of one-to-one computing in the middle school: Does increased access bring about increased student engagement? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.42.4.d.
Downes, J. M., & Bishop, P. (2012). Educators engage digital natives and learn from their experiences with technology: Integrating technology engages students in their learning. Middle School Journal, 43(5), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461824.
Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.006.
Falloon, G. (2015). What's the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010.
Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.004.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009.
Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning., 1(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2.
Gu, X., Xu, X., Wang, H., & Crook, C. (2016). Design possibilities for the e-schoolbag: Addressing the 1:1 challenge within China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12434.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Uppersaddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006.
Herrington, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Emerging technologies as cognitive tools for authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12048.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–412). Springer, New York.
Hershkovitz, A., & Karni, O. (2018). Borders of change: A holistic exploration of teaching in one-to-one computing programs. Computers & Education, 125, 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.026.
Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.
Ihaka, J. (2013). Schools put tablets on stationery list. The New Zealand Herald. Section, A4.
Irish, S. J. (2017). A teacher retrospective of a decade of one-to-one devices. Walden University: Doctoral dissertation.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116.
Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning, ZIFF papiere 119. Fern-Universität Hagen.
Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of Children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Education & Psychology, 101(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Tan, N. C., Lin, C. P., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile-device-supported problem-based computational estimation instruction for elementary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 55–69.
Lin, C., Wong, L., & Shao, Y. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00421.x.
Lippmann, S. (2013). Facilitating class sessions for ego-piercing engagement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 135, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20063.
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1, 1–12.
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Strahl, J. D., & Ross, S. M. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.46.1.a.
Lumpkin, A., Achen, R., & Dodd, R. (2015). Focusing teaching on students: Examining student perceptions of learning strategies. Quest, 67(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2015.1082143.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109–41259.
Mikami, A. Y., Boucher, M. A., & Humphreys, K. (2005). Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-004-0988-7.
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791.
Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782463.
Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273.
Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840.
Spires, H. A., Oliver, K., & Corn, J. (2011). The new learning ecology of one-to-one computing environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784682.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001.
Taboada Barber, A., Buehl, M. M., Kidd, J. K., Sturtevant, E. G., Richey Nuland, L., & Beck, J. (2014). Reading engagement in social studies: Exploring the role of a social studies literacy intervention on Reading comprehension, Reading self-efficacy, and engagement in middle school students with different language backgrounds. Reading Psychology, 36(1), 31–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.815140.
Tirado Morueta, R., Maraver López, P., Hernando Gómez, Á., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004.
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008.
Wanstreet, C. E., & Stein, D. S. (2011). Presence over time in synchronous communities of inquiry. American Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2011.590062.
Watson, R., & Coulter, J. (2008). The debate over cognitivism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407086788.
Weston, M. E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1: 1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(6).