Skip to main content


Log in

The use of Twitter and Youglish for the learning and retention of commonly mispronounced English words

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Although there is an increasing interest in educational microblogging and findings regarding its effectiveness on the language learning, relevant research, especially on the use of microblogging for the learning of pronunciation, is rather limited. This issue becomes even more apparent in countries like Turkey where English is taught as a foreign language and there is considerable number of words commonly mispronounced by Turkish language learners including pre-service language teachers. The present paper reports on the findings of a study into the effects of the social networking site Twitter and Youglish on the learning and retention of commonly mispronounced words. Twitter, a microblogging tool, was used for explicit instruction and input enhancement for the words by capitalizing of stressed syllables, providing links to authentic talks, stressing the problematic features of the target words, and showing other pronunciation-related familiar words. Youglish was used to utilize the tenets of extensive listening and input enhancement. Tweets aimed at drawing direct attention to the pronunciation of each word. In each tweet, a link to Youglish was provided as an attempt to foster pronunciation learning in context. Additionally, this study examines the attitudes towards pronunciation and views on the use of Twitter and Youglish for pronunciation instruction. Following an experimental group only design (pre, post, and retention tests), the study was conducted with 93 pre-service teachers studying at the English Language Teacher Education (ELTE) program of a large-scale university in Turkey. The data were gathered via a Pronunciation Attitude Inventory, a pronunciation test, and an open-ended survey. Seventy target words were determined after a four-week observation and note taking of commonly mispronounced words by teacher trainers and these target words were sent in 70 tweets, one word in each tweet. The tweets for each word included a link to Youglish, a Youtube-based pronunciation dictionary. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA tests were run for the analysis of the quantitative data and content analysis for the open-ended survey. The results indicated that the use of Twitter and Youglish together to teach pronunciation served an important role in learning and retaining commonly mispronounced words. The views of the pre-service teachers support the findings that they benefitted from the adopted approach. Findings from this study have strengthened the evidence supporting the impact of Twitter (supported by Youglish) for pronunciation instruction. The study also offers implications for leaners, teachers, and policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Aksakallı, C. (2018). The EFL pre-service teachers’ phonological processing, evaluation of their phonetic awareness and pedagogical needs (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University, Turkey.

  • Alipanahi, F. (2014). Technology and English language pronunciation. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(3), 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence. ELT Journal, 56(1), 7–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, R. S. (2013). Enhancing non-native prospective English language teachers’ competency in sentential stress patterns in English. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers’ knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardakci, M. (2015). Turkish EFL pre-service teachers’ pronunciation problems. Educational Research Review, 10, 2370–2378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois, M. H. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekleyen, N. (2011). Pronunciation problems of the Turkish EFL learners. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 094–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bester, G., & Brand, L. (2013). The effect of technology on learner attention and achievement in the classroom. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, G., Dalola, A., & Lomicka, L. (2015). Tweetsmarts: A pragmatic analysis of well-known native speaker tweeters. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching language learner interactions online: From social media to MOOCs (pp. 213–236). San Marcos: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, G., Dalola, A., & Lomicka, L. (2016). #MindYourHashtags: A sociopragmatic study of student interpretations of French native speakers’ tags. In L. Winstead & W. Congcong (Eds.), Handbook of research on foreign language education in the digital age (pp. 33–58). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boran, G. (2005). Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi İngilizce Öğretmenliği Programı Öğretmen Adaylarının Genel Olarak Yanlış Telaffuz Ettikleri Kelimeler Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busa, M. G. (2008). New perspectives in teaching pronunciation. In A. Baldry, M. Pavesi, C. Taylor Torsello, & C. Taylor (Eds.), From DIDACTAS to ECOLINGUA. An ongoing research project on translation and corpus linguistics (pp. 165–182). Trieste: Universita degli Studi di Trieste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., & Parmenter, L. (2012). The common european framework of reference: The globalisation of language policy (p. 10.21832/9781847697318). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cacchione, A. (2015). Creative use of twitter for dynamic assessment in language learning classroom at the university. Interaction Design and Architecture Journal, 24, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, I. (2012). Promoting correct pronunciation through supported audio materials for EFL learners. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1801–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, İ., & Baytar, B. (2014). Foreign language learners’ views on the importance of learning the target language pronunciation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Benzies, Y. J. (2013). Spanish EFL university students’ views on the teaching of pronunciation: A survey-based study. In C. Ciarlo & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), Language studies working papers (pp. 41–49). Reading: University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & Elseth, D. (2009). The usefulness of second life for language learning. In R. Marriott & P. Torres (Eds.), Handbook of research on E-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 443–455). New York: Hershey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chawinga, W. D. (2017). Taking social media to a university classroom: Teaching and learning using twitter and blogs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coskun, A. (2016). Causes of the 'I can understand English but I can't speak' syndrome in Turkey. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1-12.

  • Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from Accessed 25 Dec 2018.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, M. (2018). A promising tool for pronunciation dictionary lexicography. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 15, 81–96.

  • Darcy, I. (2018). Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it? The CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 13–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castrillo Larreta-Azelain, D. (2013). Learners’ attitude toward collaborative writing in e- language learning classes: A Twitter project for German as a foreign language. Revista Espan˜ola de Lingu¨ı’stica Aplicada, 26, 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–349). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, Ö. K. (2017). An action research: The use of an authentic web 2.0 tool to overcome pronunciation problems. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(7), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioglu, M. D. (2013). The pronunciation problems for Turkish learners in articulating of the diphthongs in English learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2983–2992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirezen, M. (2005). Rehabilitating a fossilized pronunciation error: The/v/and/w/contrast by using the audio-articulation method in teacher training in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirezen, M., & Topal, I. H. (2015). Fossilized pronunciation errors from the perspective of Turkish teachers of English and their implications. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, A., Buragga, K., & Boreqqah, A. A. (2013). Tweeters on campus: Twitter a learning tool in classroom? Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 672–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. (1996). Uses and gratifications theory to predict use of computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommett, E. J. (2018). Understanding student use of twitter and online forums in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, J. (2005). Flow as a model for CALL research. In J. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 129–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eksi, G., & Yesilcinar, S. (2016). An investigation of the effectiveness of online text-to speech tools in improving EFL teacher trainees’ pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elimat, A. K., & AbuSeileek, A. F. (2014). Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation. JALT CALL Journal, 10(1), 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. R. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. The Modeern Language Journal, 79(3), 356–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix, U. (2002). The web as a vehicle for constructivist approaches in language teaching. ReCALL, 14(1), 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2002). The changing face of listening. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 242–247). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Fouz-González, J. (2015). Trends and directions in computer-assisted pronunciation training. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions (pp. 314–342). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through twitter: The case of commonly mispronounced words. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 631–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouz-González, J., & Mompean, J. A. (2012). Twitter and English pronunciation teaching. In: Pixel (ed.) ICT for language learning 5th edition. Conference proceedings. Florence, Italy: Libreria Universitaria, pp.341–344. Available at: Accessed 2 Jan 2019.

  • Fraser, H. (2001). Teaching pronunciation: A handbook for teachers and trainers. Three frameworks for an integrated approach. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. (2001). Teaching pronunciation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 117–137). New York, NY: Newbury House.

  • Gourova, E., Asenova, A., & Dulev, P. (2013). Integrated platform for mobile learning. In D. Sampson, P. Isaias, J. M. Spector, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Ubiquitous and Mobile learning in the digital age (pp. 67–92). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseck, G., & Holotescu, C. (2008). Can we use twitter for educational activities? In Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference eLSE (pp. 17–18). Bucharest: UHP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Z., Park, E., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibility. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. L. (2011). Exploring social media relationships. On the Horizon, 19(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattem, D. (2012). The practice of microblogging. The Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 38–70. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

  • Henderson, A., Curnick, L., Frost, D., Kautzsch, A., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Levey, D., (…) Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2015). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Factors inside and outside the classroom. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz González (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Current trends and directions. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hincks, R. (2015). Technology and learning pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 505–519). Malden, NY: Wiley- Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hismanoglu, M., & Hismanoglu, S. (2011). Internet-based pronunciation teaching: An innovative route toward rehabilitating Turkish EFL learners’ articulation problems. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, L. B., Brady, K. P., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The emergence of "educational networking": Can non-commercial education-based social networking sites really address the privacy and safety concerns of educators? MERLOT's Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 475–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioup, G. (1995). Evaluating the need for input enhancement in post-critical period language acquisition. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 95–123). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2004). Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. B. (2015). Reaping the benefits of using twitter in advanced language learning. Cahiers De L’ilob, 7, 97–109.

  • Junco, R., Elavsky, M. C., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacmaz, T. (1993). An analysis of the pronunciation problems of Turkish learners of English. (unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University. Ankara.

  • Kartal, G., & Özmen, K. S. (2018). An investigation of the professional development agenda of Turkish EFL student teachers. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(3), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayaoglu, M. N., & Caylak, N. (2013). What is needed for correct pronunciation: a model ora concern? Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkut, P., & Çelik, Ö. (2018). Developing pronunciation through creative drama. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J., & LeVelle, K. (2010). Rebuilding a professional space for pronunciation. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 1–9). Iowa: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging-based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11(1), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, K. (2009). Social networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for re-creation. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 35–58). San Marcos, TX: Calico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messum, P. (2012). Teaching pronunciation without using imitation: Why and how. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 154–160). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mompean, J., & Fouz-Gonzalés, J. (2016). Twitter based EFL pronunciation instruction. Language, Learning and Technology, 20(1), 166–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J. (1991). Listening comprehension in second/foreign language instruction. In M. Celce Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 81–106) Heinle & Heinle. Boston. MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myartawan, I. P., Latief, N. W., & Suharmanto, M. A. (2013). The correlation between learner autonomy and English proficiency of Indonesian EFL college learners. TEFLIN Journal, 24(1), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakazawa, K. (2012). The effectiveness of focused attention on pronunciation and intonation training in tertiary Japanese language education on learners’ confidence: Preliminary report on training workshops and a supplementary computer program. The International Journal of Learning, 18(4), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pe’rez-Sabater, C., & Montero-Fleta, B. (2015). ESP vocabulary and social networking: The case of Twitter. Ibe’rio, 29, 129–154. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Asus/Desktop/Dialnet-ESPVocabularyAndSocialNetworking-5039229.pdf.

  • Pennington, M. C. (1998). The teachability of pronunciation in adulthood: A reconsideration. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccardo, E., North, B., & Goodier, T. (2019). Broadening the scope of language education: Mediation, plurilingualism, and collaborative learning: The CEFR companion volüme. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pim, C. (2013). Emerging technologies, emerging minds: Digital innovations within the primary sector. Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching (20–42). London: British Council.

  • Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renandya, W., & Farrell, T. (2010). Teacher, the tape is too fast! Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, K. (2013). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development: The role of explicit phonetic information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saran, M., Seferoğlu, G., & Çagıltay, K. (2009). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation atlearners’ fingertips. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saricoban, A., & Kuc, A. (2010). Teaching problematic consonants in English to young learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 943–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seferoğlu, G. (2005). Improving students' pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2007). Screw Blackboard... do it on Facebook! an investigation of students' educational use of Facebook. Retrieved from Accessed 11 Jan 2019.

  • Senel, M. (2006). Suggestions for beautifying the pronunciation of EFL learners in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharwood-Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, R. (2002). Pronunciation instruction: Classroom practice and empirical research. Linguagem Ensino, 5(1), 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25, 528–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taşkıran, A., Bozkurt, A., & Aydın, B. (2016). Forming learner communities with twitter in EFL context. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1623–1628). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education, 47(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vodopija-Krastanovic, I. (2012). NESTs versus non-NESTs: Rethinking English-language teacher identities. In J. I. Huttner, B. Mehlmauer-Larcher, S. Reichl, & B. Schiftner (Eds.), Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: Bridge the gap. Ontario, Canada: Multilingual Matters.

  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2–3), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (1999). British English pronunciation preferences: A changing scene. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 29, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yağız, O. (2018). EFL language teachers’ cognitions and observed classroom practices about L2 pronunciation: The context of Turkey. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(2), 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G., & Macdonald, D. (1994). The effects of pronunciation teaching. In J. Morley (Ed.), Pronunciation pedagogy and theory: New views, new directions (pp. 109–118). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zając, M. (2015). Compiling a Corpus-based list of words commonly mispronounced. In E. Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English: Studies in honour of Włodzimierz Sobkowiak, second language learning and teaching (pp. 153–167). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Galip Kartal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: The pronunciation test used as the pre, post, and retention test

Appendix: The pronunciation test used as the pre, post, and retention test

  1. 1.

    Is an avocado a fruit or a vegetable?

  2. 2.

    The very heart of our democracy.

  3. 3.

    Is there An Advantage In Using Multiple Indicators?

  4. 4.

    It does not affect the statistics in any way.

  5. 5.

    Behind her, the cupboard doors were open.

  6. 6.

    In this paper, I analyze the fee structure.

  7. 7.

    These answer nodes are added to the graph.

  8. 8.

    This raises levels of anxiety.

  9. 9.

    What is the most appropriate treatment?

  10. 10.

    More research is needed in this area.

  11. 11.

    American black bear.

  12. 12.

    Whole wheat bread.

  13. 13.

    Today, they were gathered to bury their leader.

  14. 14.

    A bias towards business?

  15. 15.

    I’ll stop by the butcher’s on my way.

  16. 16.

    Tap the exact same button three times.

  17. 17.

    They were having coffee in a cafe.

  18. 18.

    They will not cause any harm.

  19. 19.

    He went to get his birth certificate.

  20. 20.

    Chemical Sample Selection

  21. 21.

    The scientist wrote that a colleague helped them.

  22. 22.

    Written and oral communication skills.

  23. 23.

    His wife was so conscious about her age.

  24. 24.

    Redesigning an existing course

  25. 25.

    The cow had a new calf.

  26. 26.

    Thus, the academic discussion of debt priorities has two dimensions.

  27. 27.

    Once in a decade opportunity

  28. 28.

    It is possible to determine the average total fee load per fund.

  29. 29.

    A promising pedagogical development.

  30. 30.

    You think you can conquer the whole World

  31. 31.

    He went to the eye doctor,

  32. 32.

    Except under certain specific conditions

  33. 33.

    The contemnor “carries the keys of his prison in his own pockets.

  34. 34.

    The net effect on the TFL is significantly positive.

  35. 35.

    This would be a great white elephant gift.

  36. 36.

    An analytical study in American foreign policy

  37. 37.

    Forget yesterday’s news.

  38. 38.

    Give me a fruit beer.

  39. 39.

    They show things through gesture.

  40. 40.

    Left behind are gigantic pillars of salt.

  41. 41.

    Most people who come to our hotel are amateur and recreational cyclists.

  42. 42.

    It’s a request to hurry up and have a life again.

  43. 43.

    An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law.

  44. 44.

    Why are you always so stubborn?

  45. 45.

    I saw the dome of the Blue Mosque.

  46. 46.

    There can be a lot of crime occur without you knowing.

  47. 47.

    Those fans today should not waste their opportunity.

  48. 48.

    He didn’t have’ a particularly happy childhood,’ he recalls.

  49. 49.

    They’re probably trying harder with that marriage now than they’ve ever done.

  50. 50.

    Forgiveness in Criminal Procedure.

  51. 51.

    e.g. economics, psychology, sociology, mathematics.

  52. 52.

    This takes us into the realm of language.

  53. 53.

    Sheep can be trained to recognise human faces.

  54. 54.

    The person in question was a relative of hers and was killed.

  55. 55.

    Four separate police forces are monitoring every traveller’s vehicle.

  56. 56.

    Stones do not signal or symbolize Grandfathers.

  57. 57.

    Then talk to a building society at the planning stage.

  58. 58.

    As partial evidence of the success of the course revision.

  59. 59.

    But everyone read with fluency and had a superlative accent except me.

  60. 60.

    Riley wiped a bead of sweat from her brow.

  61. 61.

    She turns towards his uncertainly.

  62. 62.

    And they make the most of their spirit world vacation.

  63. 63.

    It has become so rare thanks to vaccination.

  64. 64.

    In Bustamonte, the police pulled over a vehicle containing six individuals.

  65. 65.

    At that stage, he was a virtual non-reader and was unable to write a coherent sentence.

  66. 66.

    You will need to wear protective glasses.

  67. 67.

    Then the wind dropped and the surface of the sea was still.

Note: As the sentences and phrases were used as distractors the words were not in italic in the participant copy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kartal, G., Korucu-Kis, S. The use of Twitter and Youglish for the learning and retention of commonly mispronounced English words. Educ Inf Technol 25, 193–221 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: