Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system
- 343 Downloads
This paper examines mathematics teachers’ level of acceptance and intention to use the Augmented Reality Geometry Tutorial System (ARGTS), a mobile Augmented Reality (AR) application developed to enhance students’ 3D geometric thinking skills. ARGTS was shared with mathematics teachers, who were then surveyed using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to understand their acceptance of the technology. We also examined the external variables of Anxiety, Social Norms and Satisfaction. The effect of the teacher’s gender, degree of graduate status and number of years of teaching experience on the subscales of the TAM model were examined. We found that the Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) had a direct effect on the Perceived Usefulness (PU) in accordance with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Both variables together affect Satisfaction (SF), however PEU had no direct effect on Attitude (AT). In addition, while Social Norms (SN) had a direct effect on PU and PEU, there was no direct effect on Behavioural Intention (BI). Anxiety (ANX) had a direct effect on PEU, but no effect on PU and SF. While there was a direct effect of SF on PEU, no direct effect was found on BI. We explain how the results of this study could help improve the understanding of AR acceptance by teachers and provide important guidelines for AR researchers, developers and practitioners.
KeywordsAugmented reality 3D geometric thinking skills Mathematics teachers Technology acceptance model
Compliance with ethical standards
This research was supported by the postdoctoral research programme (BİDEB 2219) of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). Learner differences in perceived satisfaction of an online learning: An extension to the technology acceptance model in an Arabic sample. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(5), 408–426.Google Scholar
- Arvanitis, T. N., Williams, D. D., Knight, J. F., Baber, C., Gargalakos, M., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). A human factors study of technology acceptance of a prototype mobile augmented reality system for science education. Advanced Science Letters, 4(11–12), 3342–3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bellone, L. M., & Czerniak, C. M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about accommodating students’ learning styles in science classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 4–29.Google Scholar
- Gürbüz, R., & Gülburnu, M. (2013). Effect of teaching geometry with use Cabri 3D in eighth grade on conceptual learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 4(3), 224–241.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Haugstvedt, A. C. Krogstie, J. (2017). Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA, 5–8 November 2012. Washington: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Hunt, H. K. (1977). CS/D - Overview and future research directions. In H. K. Hunt (Ed.), Conceptualizion and measurement of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction (pp. 77-103). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
- Ibáñez, M.B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., Delgado-Kloos, C. (2016) The acceptance of learning augmented reality environments: a case study. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), (pp. 307–311). IEEE.Google Scholar
- İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–23.Google Scholar
- Karakırık, E. (2011). Geometry teaching with Dynamic geometry and Sketchpad. In E. Karakırık (Ed.), Technology use in mathematics education (pp. 67–96). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lee, G., Teo, T., Kim, S. and M. Billinghurst (2017). Mixed reality collaboration through sharing a live panorama. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Mobile Graphics Interactive Applications (p. 14). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Lin, H. C., Chiu, Y. H., Chen, Y. J., Wuang, Y. P., Chen, C. P., Wang, C. C., Huang, C. L., Wu, T. M., & Ho, W. H. (2017). Continued use of an interactive computer game-based visual perception learning system in children with developmental delay. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 107, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M.E.B - T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education), (2018) Elementary-Secondary Mathematics Lesson Curriculum (1–8. Grade), Ankara.Google Scholar
- M.E.B - T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education), Board of Education (2009). Secondary Mathematics Lesson Curriculum (6–8 Grade), Ankara.Google Scholar
- Mlaiki, A., Kailka, M., & Kefi, H. (2011). Facebook… encore, encore…! Rôle de l’affect, de l’habitude et de la surcharge informationnelle dans la continuité d’utilisation des réseaux sociaux numériques. Disponible sur: https://basepub.dauphine.fr/bitstream/handle/123456789/7963/Kalika_aim2011.PDF?sequence=1. Accessed 01 Apr 2019.
- Osman N. B. (2013). Extending the technology acceptance model for mobile government systems, The international Arab conference on information technology (ACIT’2013). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e7f4/bd830907d2b7d86a0d0a0ea578433de80ad0.pdf. Accessed 01 Apr 2019.
- Prieto, J. C. S., Migueláñez, S. O., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Utilizarán los futuros docentes las tecnologías móviles? Validación de una propuesta de modelo TAM extendido. Revista de Educación a Distancia, (52).Google Scholar
- Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2017). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.06127.Google Scholar