Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to study the factors that affect university students’ acceptance of E-learning systems. To achieve this objective, we have proposed a new model that aims to investigate the impact of innovativeness, quality, trust, and knowledge sharing on E-learning acceptance. Data collection has taken place through an online questionnaire survey, which was carried out at The British University in Dubai (BUiD) and University of Fujairah (UOF) in the UAE. There were 251 students participated in this study. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS and SPSS. The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) has been used to validate the proposed model. The outcomes revealed that knowledge sharing and quality in the universities have a positive influence on E-learning acceptance among the students. Innovativeness and trust were found not to significantly affect the E-learning system acceptance. By identifying the factors that influence the E-learning acceptance, it will be more useful to provide better services for E-learning. Other implications are also presented in the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abbas, M., Shahid Nawaz, M., Ahmad, J., & Ashraf, M. (2017). The effect of innovation and consumer related factors on consumer resistance to innovation. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1312058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Al-Aish, A. (2014). Toward mobile learning deployment in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University, School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics).

  3. Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: an investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5).

  4. Adel, R. (2017). Manage perceived e-learning quality in Egyptian context. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 28(5), 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akter, S., D'Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models: The roles of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index.

  6. Al Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2014a). A survey of intelligent language tutoring systems. In Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI, 2014 International Conference on (pp. 393-399). IEEE.

  7. Al Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. F. (2014b). E-podium technology: A medium of managing knowledge at Al Buraimi University college via M-learning. In BCS International IT Conference.

  8. Al-Emran, M., & Malik, S. I. (2016). The impact of google apps at work: higher educational perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 10(4), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Emran, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2017). Students' attitudes towards the use of mobile technologies in e-evaluation. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 11(5), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2015). Attitudes towards the use of mobile learning: a case study from the gulf region. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 9(3), 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2017). Academics’ awareness towards mobile learning in Oman. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 6(1).

  12. Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkandari, B. (2015). An investigation of the factors affecting students’ acceptance and intention to use E-learning systems at Kuwait University: Developing a technology acceptance model in E-learning environments (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University).

  14. Alkhalaf, S., Drew, S., & Alhussain, T. (2012). Assessing the impact of e-learning systems on learners: A survey study in the KSA. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). Exploring the factors that affect student satisfaction through using e-learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 299.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ashill, N. J., & Jobber, D. (2010). Measuring state, effect, and response uncertainty: Theoretical construct development and empirical validation. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1278–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (pls) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption Ans use as an illustration.

  19. Behera, S. K. (2013). E-and M-learning: A comparative study. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cakir, R., & Solak, E. (2014). Exploring the factors influencing E-learning of Turkish EFL learners through TAM. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3).

  21. Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Relationships between the EFQM model criteria: a study in Spanish universities. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 16(6), 741–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell, C., & Ma, J. J. (2015). Looking forward, looking back: Drawing on the past to shape the future of marketing. In Proceedings of the 2013 World Marketing Congress.

  23. Chang, W. L., & Lee, C. Y. (2013). Trust as a learning facilitator that affects students' learning performance in the Facebook community: An investigation in a business planning writing course. Computers & Education, 62, 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, H. R., & Tseng, H. F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based E-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng, W. Y. T., & Chen, C. C. (2015). The impact of e-learning on workplace on-the-job training. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 5(4), 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Berlin:Springer.

  28. Chou, H. K., Lin, I. C., Woung, L. C., & Tsai, M. T. (2012). Engagement in e-learning opportunities: An empirical study on patient education using expectation confirmation theory. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1697–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dečman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of E-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dreheeb, A. E., Basir, N., & Fabil, N. (2016). Impact of system quality on Users' satisfaction in continuation of the use of E-learning system. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and E-learning, 6(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eid, M. I., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–21.

  35. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.

  36. Faqih, K. M. (2016)Which is more important in e-learning adoption, perceived value or perceived usefulness? Examining the moderating influence of perceived compatibility.

  37. Farahat, T. (2012). Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fong, S. K. C. J., & Wang, W. F. F. L. (2013) Hybrid learning and continuing education.

  39. Fook, C. Y., Sidhu, G. K., Narasuman, S., Fong, L. L., & Rahman, S. B. A. (Eds.). (2015). 7th International conference on university learning and teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings: Educate to innovate. Springer.

  40. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 440–452.

  41. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61, 101–107.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

  43. Harun, A., Liew, T. S., Kassim, A. W. M., & Sulong, R. S. (2015). Smartphone dependency and its impact on purchase behavior. Asian Social Science, 11(26), 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. Handbook of research on international advertising, 252.

  45. Islam, A. N. (2012). Understanding e-learning system usage outcomes in hybrid courses. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 118-127). IEEE.

  46. Jaradat, M. I. R. M. (2014). Understanding individuals' perceptions, determinants and the moderating effects of age and gender on the adoption of mobile learning: Developing country perspective. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3–4), 253–275.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting E-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access.

  49. Kundu, S. C., & Gahlawat, N. (2016). Ability–motivation–opportunity enhancing human resource practices and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–18.

  50. Lee, Y. C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an E-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liao, C. H., & Huang, W. L. (2009). Community adaptability, computer and internet self-efficacy, and intention of blended e-learning. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 1(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin, C. S., Tzeng, G. H., Chin, Y. C., & Chang, C. C. (2010). Recommendation sources on the intention to use e-books in academic digital libraries. The Electronic Library, 28(6), 844–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, Y., & Wu, Y. (2010). A survey on trust and trustworthy E-learning system. In Web Information Systems and Mining (WISM), 2010 International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 118-122). IEEE.

  55. Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lu, H. P., & Chiou, M. J. (2010). The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Shim, J. P. (2010). Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: An empirical study of mobile banking services. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 222–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ma, W., & Yuen, A. (2011). 11. E-learning system acceptance and usage pattern. Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues, 201.

  59. Mahmodi, M. (2017). The analysis of the factors affecting the acceptance of E-learning in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, (In Press).

  60. Masa'd, F. M. S. (2017). Implementation of E-training in developing country: Empirical evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 10(4), 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Matias-Reche, F., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2008). Entrepreneurial size, complexity and decentralization of decision-making in the use of temporary help workers in Spain. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Migdadi, M. M., Abu Zaid, M. K. S., Al-Hujran, O. S., & Aloudat, A. M. (2016). An empirical assessment of the antecedents of electronic-business implementation and the resulting organizational performance. Internet Research, 26(3), 661–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Milošević, I., Živković, D., Manasijević, D., & Nikolić, D. (2015). The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Misra, B. M. S., Torre, A. M. A. R. C., Falcão, J. G. R. M. I., Apduhan, D. T. B. O., &Gervasi, O. (2014). Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2014.

  65. Mtebe, J. (2014). Acceptance and use of eLearning Technologies in Higher Education in East Africa.

  66. Ngafeeson, M. N., & Sun, J. (2015). The effects of technology innovativeness and system exposure on student acceptance of e-textbooks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The theory of measurement error. Psychometric theory, 209–247.

  68. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Purnomo, S. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2013). E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia: An empirical study. Information Development, 29(2), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Rahman, I. A., Memon, A. H., Abdullah, N. H., & Azis, A. A. A. (2013). Application of PLS-SEM to assess the influence of construction resources on cost overrun. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 284, pp. 3649-3656). Trans Tech Publications.

  71. Robinson Jr, L. (Ed.). (2014). Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same...: Proceedings of the 2012 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Springer.

  72. Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). What leads people to keep on e-learning? An empirical analysis of users' experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1030–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Roky, H., & Al Meriouh, Y. (2015). Evaluation by users of an industrial information system (XPPS) based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 903–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2017). A survey of text mining in social media: Facebook and twitter perspectives. Advances in Science Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 2(1), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees’ collaboration in industrial service innovation: Routes of co-creation’s effects on new service performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Senapathi, M., & Srinivasan, A. (2014). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting agile usage. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (p. 10). ACM.

  77. Skersys, T., Butleris, R., Nemuraite, L., & Suomi, R. (Eds.). (2011). Building the E-World Ecosystem: 11th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on E-Business, E-Services, and E-Society, I3E 2011, Kaunas, Lithuania, October 12-14, 2011, Revised Selected Papers (Vol. 353). Springer.

  78. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological), 111–147.

  79. Storey, C., & Kahn, K. B. (2010). The role of knowledge management strategies and task knowledge in stimulating service innovation. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). Factors affecting students' acceptance of E-learning environments in developing countries: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tarhini, A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2016). Modeling factors affecting Student’s usage behaviour of E-learning Systems in Lebanon. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 299.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

  86. Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building trust in E-learning. Athens Journal of Education, 1(1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-learning 2.0 systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Yatigammana, M. R. K. N., Johar, M. D. G. M. D., & Gunawardhana, C. (2013). Impact of Innovations attributes on E-learning acceptance among Sri Lankan postgraduate students.

  90. Yee-Loong Chong, A., Ooi, K. B., Bao, H., & Lin, B. (2014). Can e-business adoption be influenced by knowledge management? An empirical analysis of Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in E-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2004). Knowledge sharing and teacher acceptance of web based learning system. In C. McBeath, Atkinson, D. Jonas-Dwyer, and R. Phillips, editors, Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 975-983).

  93. Yusof, Z. M., Ismail, M. B., Ahmad, K., & Yusof, M. M. (2012). Knowledge sharing in the public sector in Malaysia: A proposed holistic model. Information Development, 28(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Tarhini.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. et al. Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Educ Inf Technol 24, 509–530 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9786-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • E-learning
  • Technology acceptance
  • Knowledge sharing
  • Technology innovativeness
  • System quality
  • Trust