Abstract
Molecular symmetry plays a central role in chemistry education with regard to predicting chemical properties such as bonding and spectroscopic transitions. Better understanding of the symmetry of molecules requires high visual-spatial thinking ability. Conventional teaching methodologies, with limited teaching aides, fall short in providing a detailed understanding of scientific theories and related concepts. Incorrect understanding has been known to perpetrate concepts that are not consistent with the consensus of the research community or alternate conceptions. This work elaborates a methodology designed to discover the alternate conceptions stemming from teaching molecular symmetry in a typical classroom environment and the impact of the virtual laboratory (VL) environment in correcting these misconceptions. Three significant contributions presented in this paper include: (1) the development of a media and information-intense VL experiment platform designed to enhance understanding of symmetry elements and point groups of molecules with diverse structural geometries. (2) the development of an instrument, Molecular symmetry Alternate Conception Test (MACT), designed to capture and estimate the extent of alternate conceptions. (3) the successful identification of typical alternate conceptions amongst students in the context of molecular symmetry. In addition to perceived alternate concepts in symmetry education, the results indicate a significant statistical improvement of 156% in understanding of molecular symmetry concepts (p < 0.05) after subjecting students to the interactive VL platform. This study also shows identifying bond angles and planarity as concepts crucial for students. It is also implicit that estimations of discrimination skills related to identifying concept-based learning may be relevant for perceiving alternate concepts among learners.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Achuthan, K., Sreelatha, K., Surendran, S., Diwakar, S., Nedungadi, P., Humphreys, S., CO, S.S., Pillai, Z., Raman, R., Deepthi, A., et al. (2011). The value @ amrita virtual labs project: Using web technology to provide virtual laboratory access to students. In: Global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC), 2011 IEEE, pp. 117–121. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2011.79.
Achuthan, K., Brahmanandan, S., Bose, L.S. (2015). Cognitive load management in multimedia enhanced interactive virtual laboratories. In: Advances in Intelligent Informatics, pp. 143–155. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11218-3 15.
Atkins, P., de Paula, J. (2006). Atkin’s physical chemistry, 8th edn. No. v. 1 in physical chemistry. W. H. Freeman.
Bishop, D.M. (1993). Group theory and chemistry. Dover Books on Chemistry Series. Dover Publications, New York.
Bowen, A., Reid, D., & Koretsky, M. (2015). Development of interactive virtual laboratories to help students learn difficult concepts in thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Education, 49(4), 229–238.
Carter, R. L. (1968). A flow-chart approach to point group classification. Journal of Chemical Education, 45(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed045p44.
Cass, M. E., Rzepa, H. S., Rzepa, D. R., & Williams, C. K. (2005). The use of the free, open-source program jmol to generate an interactive web site to teach molecular symmetry. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(11), 1736–1740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1736.
Charistos, N. D., Tsipis, C. A., & Sigalas, M. P. (2005). 3d molecular symmetry shockwave: A web application for interactive visualization and three-dimensional perception of molecular symmetry. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(11), 1741–1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1741.2.
Cho, Y. H., & Lim, K. Y. (2017). Effectiveness of collaborative learning with 3d virtual worlds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12356.
Cotton, F.A. (2008).Chemical applications of group theory, 3rd edn. Wiley.
Diwakar, S., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P. (2010). Biotechnology virtual labs - integrating wet-lab techniques and theoretical learning for enhanced learning at universities. In: International Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering, 2010, pp. 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSDE.2010.22.
Diwakar, S., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., & Nair, B. (2011). Enhanced facilitation of biotechnology education in developing nations via virtual labs: Analysis, implementation and case-studies. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 3(1), 1793–8201. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2011.V3.275.
Diwakar, S., Parasuram, H., Medini, C., Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., Wiertelak, E., Srivastava, S., Achuthan, K., & Nair, B. (2014). Complementing neurophysiology education for developing countries via cost-effective virtual labs: Case studies and classroom scenarios. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(2), A130–A139.
Elby, A. (1999). Another reason that physics students learn by rote. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1), S52–S57. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19081.
Fedosky, E.W., Coleman, W.F. (2005). Teaching molecular symmetry with jce webware. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1741.1.
Flint, E. B. (2011). Teaching point-group symmetry with three-dimensional models. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(7), 907–909. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100893e.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559905.
Goss, J. (2007). Point group symmetry. Last update: 17 Novenmber 2007.
Herga, N., & Dinevski, D. (2012). Virtual laboratory in chemistry-experimental study of understanding, reproduction and application of acquired knowledge of subject’s chemical content. The Organ, 45(3), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0011-7.
Horton, C. (2001). Student preconceptions and misconceptions in chemistry. In: Integrated Physics and Chemistry Modeling Workshop. Arizona State University.
Immel, S. (2016). Molecular structures of organic compounds - symmetry and point groups. Last Update: 06 April 2016.
Jaffé, H. H., & Orchin, M. (2002). Symmetry in chemistry. New York: Dover Publications Inc..
Jegede, P. O., Dibu-Ojerinde, O. O., & Ilori, M. O. (2007). Relationships between ict competence and attitude among some nigerian tertiary institution lecturers. Educational Research and Reviews, 2(7), 172–175.
Johnston, D.H. (2016). Symmetry @ otterbein - space groups. Last Update: 01 July 2016.
Kerimbayev, N. (2016). Virtual learning: Possibilities and realization. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1521–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9397-1.
Korkmaz, A., & Harwood, W. S. (2004). Web-supported chemistry education: Design of an online tutorial for learning molecular symmetry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031263.82327.6e.
Lesk, A. M. (2004). The relationship between group theory and chemistry. In Introduction to symmetry and group theory for chemists (pp. 1–2). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2151-81.
Lucariello, J., Naff, D. (2013). How do i get my students over their alternative conceptions (misconceptions) for learning? removing barriers to aid in the development of the student. Accessed on: 01–12-2018.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A User’s manual. Pearson series in educational innovation: Instructor resources for physics series. Prentice Hall.
McKay, S. E., & Boone, S. R. (2001). An early emphasis on symmetry and a three-dimensional perspective in the chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(11), 1487–1490. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1487.
Meyer, D. E., & Sargent, A. L. (2007). An interactive computer program to help students learn molecular symmetry elements and operations. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1551–1552. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1551.
Molloy, K. C. (2010). Group theory for chemists: Fundamental theory and applications (2nd ed.). UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
Mortimer, R. (2005). Mathematics for physical chemistry (3rd ed.). Mathematics for Physical Chemistry Series: Elsevier Science.
Mulford, D. R., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p739.
Nair, B., Krishnan, R., Nizar, N., Radhamani, R., Rajan, K., Yoosef, A., Sujatha, G., Rad-hamony, V., Achuthan, K., & Diwakar, S. (2012). Role of ict-enabled visualization-oriented virtual laboratories in universities for enhancing biotechnology education–value initiative: Case study and impacts. FormaMente, 7(1–2), 1–18.
Nakhleh, M. B., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p190.
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279.
Olenick, R. (2007). Comprehensive conceptual curriculum for physics.(C3P project). Profiles in Science: A Guide to NSF-Funded High School Instructional Materials.
Ozmen, H. (2008). The influence of computer-assisted instruction on students conceptual understanding of chemical bonding and attitude toward chemistry: A case for Turkey. Computers & Education, 51(1), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.002.
Pfennig, B. (2015). Principles of inorganic chemistry. Wiley.
Pzekdăg, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: Learning with animation, simulation, video and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 111–118.
Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., Diwakar, S. (2015). Role of biotechnology simulation and remotely triggered virtual labs in complementing university education. In: International conference on interactive mobile communication technologies and learning (IMCL), 2015, pp. 28–32. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359548.
Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educational technology & society, 16(1), 159–170.
Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.012.
Tsukerblat, B. S. (2006). Group theory in chemistry and spectroscopy: A simple guide to advanced usage. San Diego: Academic Press.
Tuvi-Arad, I., & Gorsky, P. (2007). New visualization tools for learning molecular symmetry: A preliminary evaluation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90020H.
Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International online. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37–39.
Venter, C. J., & Coetzee, J. (2013). Interactive learning through gaming simulation in an integrated land use–transportation planning course. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 140(1), 003(1–9), 04013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000171.
Wenning, C. (2008). Dealing more effectively with alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(1), 11–19.
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126.
Acknowledgements
This work derives direction and ideas from the Chancellor of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi. This work was funded by Virtual Labs project, NMEICT, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India and by Embracing the World. Authors would like to thank the VALUE Virtual Labs team and CREATE team at Amrita in developing and deploying virtual laboratories.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 133 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Achuthan, K., Kolil, V.K. & Diwakar, S. Using virtual laboratories in chemistry classrooms as interactive tools towards modifying alternate conceptions in molecular symmetry. Educ Inf Technol 23, 2499–2515 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9727-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9727-1