Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital competencies among student populations in Kosovo: the impact of inclusion, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and type of residence

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present research studies the impact of variables such as inclusion, exclusion, residence, socioeconomic status, gender and parental education on digital competences among student populations in Kosovo (N = 303). The findings reveal that in accordance with international literature inclusion and exclusion in academic settings predict levels of digital competences reported by participants. To that end students who reported being included in academic settings also reported the highest levels of digital competences. Participants who reported feeling excluded were the ones to report the lowest levels of digital competences. Socioeconomic standing was also a powerful influential variable with participants reporting low digital competences when they reported financial hardship. Similarly, participants who reported a higher socioeconomic standing reported the highest levels of digital competences. Residence was also an influential variable with participants residing in urban areas reporting the highest levels of digital competences while participants living in rural areas reported the lowest levels of skills. Finally, along with providing data from a country that is not present in international research, present study is a first one to offer information on digital competences in Kosovo and as such is important for policy building in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, O. P., Bhasin, S. K., Sharma, A. K., Chhabra, P., Aggarwal, K., & Rajoura, O. P. (2005). New instrument (scale) for measuring the socioeconomic status of a family: Preliminary study. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 30(4), 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Inclusion and the standards agenda: Negotiating policy pressures in England. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J., Harris-Murri, N., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J., Waitoller, F. R., & Neal, R. (2010). Grappling with the intersection of language and ability differences: Equity issues for Chicano/Latino students in special education. In R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (pp. 213–234). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore, D., & Gordon Simons, L. W. (2012). The influence of ethnicity and adverse life experiences during adolescence on young adult socioeconomic attainment: The moderating role of education. Youth Adolescence, 1–16.

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York, NY: Columbia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F.D., Kahn L.M. (2002). At Home and Abroad: U.S. Labor Market Performance in International Perspective. New York: Russell Sage.

  • Bowles, K. (2000). The relationship of critical-thinking skills and the clinical-judgment skills of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G., Klebanov, P., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, E. C., Glazer, E., Hansen, M. A., & Kurscht, A. (1974). Associations between educational outcomes and background variables [monograph]. Denver, CO: National Assessment of Educational Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., et al . (1966).Equality of educational opportunity (2 vols.). Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.

  • Coley, R. J. (2002). An uneven start: Indicators of inequality in school readiness. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R., Conger, K., & Martin, M. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. (1999). The economic progress of African-American women. In I. Browne (Ed.), Latinas and African American women at work: Race, gender, and economic inequality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan C.D., and Sellman S.W. (2008).Improving the quality of NAEP socioeconomic status information: Report on research activities. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO). (Retrieved from http://www.humrro.org/corpsite/publication/improving-quality-naep-socioeconomic-status-information-report-research-activities, February, 2012).

  • Cuff, N. B. (1934). The vectors of socio-economic status. Peabody Journal of Education, 12(3), 114–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, D., Menard, S., Rankin, B., Elliot, A., Wilson, W., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ergin, A., & Birol, C. (2005). Communication in education. Ankara Anı: Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi, P. (2006). Personnel economics in imperfect labor markets. Oxford, England: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, S., & Aseltine Jr., R. (2003). Race and ethnic differences in depressed mood following the transition from high school. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 370–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habaci, I., Çelik, E., Habaci, M., Adigüzelli, & Kurt, S. (2013). Effective communication in Educational Administration. US-Cina Education Review, 3(9), 690–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 607–668.

  • Harwell, M. R., & Lebeau, B. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39, 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C. E. (1916). The relationship between persistence in school and home conditions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. Lynn & M. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2011). New educational paradigm for learning and instruction. International conference on education research. USA: Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence upon child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreman, T., McGhie-Richmond, D., Barber, J., & Lupart, J. (2008). Student perspectives on inclusive education: A survey of grade 3-6 children in rural Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 5(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J.L., Whitley, J., Odishaw, J., & McDonald, L. (2006). Whole school evaluation and inclusion: How elementary school participants perceive their learning community. In C. Dionne & N. Rousseau (Eds). Transformation of educational practices: Research on inclusive education (pp. 113–143). Quebec: Presses de l‘Universite du Quebec.

  • Lynn, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown: A study in American culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASHT. (2004). Strategy for te development of higher education in Kosova. Prishtine: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S., & Ainscow, M. (2008). Making education for all inclusive: Where next. Prospects, 15–34.

  • Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Forum on Education Statistics (2015). Forum Guide to Alternative Measures of Socioeconomic Status in Education Data Systems. (NFESe 2015–158). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • NCREL & Metiri Group (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Napierville, IL and Los Angeles, CA: NCREL and Metiri.

  • Noss, R. (2012). 21st century learning for 21st century skills: What does it mean, and how do we do it. In R. Noss, 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (pp. 3–5). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001). Glossary of statistical terms. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1264

  • OECD (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.

  • Pennings, R. (2001, July). University of Wisconsin. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from University of Wisconsin: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.391.4151&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, V. C., Chua, C., & Kheng, S. (2015). School stakeholders’ experience with navigating ICT policy reforms in Singapore. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 11(4), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review, 1–17.

  • Shariati, S., Armarego, J., & Sudweeks, F. (2017). The impact of e-skills on the settlement of Iranian refugees in Australia. Interdisciplinary journal of E-skills and lifelong. Learning, 59–77.

  • Silva, E. (2009). Measuring Skills fo 21st-Century Learning .Phi Delta Kappa International, 630–634.

  • Simons, R. (1996). Understanding the differences between divorced and intact families: Stress, interaction, and child outcomes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, T. M. T., Osman, K., & Arsad, N. M. (2012). M-21CSI: A validated 21st century skills instrument for secondary science students. Asian Social Science, pp. 38–44.

  • Tillbury, D. (2007). Learning based change for sustainability: Perspectives and pathways. In A. E. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world (pp. 117–132). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titzmann, P. F., Silbereisen, R. K., Mesch, G. S., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2011). Migration-specific hassles among adolescent immigrants from the former soviet Union in Germany and Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 777–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van der Rijst, R. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2015). A questionnaire to capture students’ perceptions of research integration in their courses. Higher Education, pp. 1-16.

  • Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & Brummelhuis, A. (2015). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1–11.

  • Waitoller, F. R., & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 319–357.

  • White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickrama, K., & Bryant, C. (2003). Community context of social resources and adolescent mental health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 850–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L., & Stockdale, S. L. (2003). High-performing students with low critical thinking skills. Journal of General Education, 52, 199–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Goup in Kosovo. (2015). Country snapshot 2015. Prishtine: The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, Kosovo: Country brief (2010). World Bank, Washington DC, 2010; http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/KOSOVOEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20629286~menuPK:297777~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:297770,00.html#econ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professional Development Institute, Prishtine, Kosovo

    Arif Shala & Albulene Grajcevci

Authors
  1. Arif Shala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albulene Grajcevci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Shala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shala, A., Grajcevci, A. Digital competencies among student populations in Kosovo: the impact of inclusion, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and type of residence. Educ Inf Technol 23, 1203–1218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9657-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9657-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation