Students’ acceptance of file sharing systems as a tool for sharing course materials: The case of Google Drive
Students’ perceptions about both ease of use and usefulness are fundamental factors in determining their acceptance and successful use of technology in higher education. File sharing systems are one of these technologies and can be used to manage and deliver course materials and coordinate virtual teams. The aim of this study is to explore how Google Drive is accepted as a system for handling course materials and uncover the factors that influence and contribute to students’ intentions to use it. The research approach is based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). The participants for this study comprised 119 students at Sultan Qaboos University. The Students’ Acceptance of Google Drive Questionnaire was develop by the author based on the TAM. The results indicated that students perceived Google Drive as an easy-to-use and useful system for storing and sharing course materials, and they favored its use in university teaching. The results of a multiple regression analysis confirmed that students’ prior experience with Google Drive is a good predictor of students’ perceived ease of use and usefulness. In addition, perceived ease of use and usefulness significantly influenced attitudes toward the system and behavioral intentions to use Google Drive.
KeywordsFile sharing systems Google Drive Technology acceptance model LMS Course materials
- Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning using the technology acceptance model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4–18.Google Scholar
- Apple, J., Reis-Bergan, M., Adams, H., & Saunders, G. (2011). Online tools to promote student collaboration. In D. S. Dunn, J. H. Wilson, J. Freeman, & J. R. Stowell (Eds.), Getting connected: best practices for technology enhanced teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 239–252). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, M., & Hocutt, D. (2015). Learning to use, useful for learning: a usability study of Google apps for education. Journal of Usability Studies, 10(4), 160–181 Retrieved from http://uxpajournal.org/usability-study-google-apps-education.Google Scholar
- Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: origins, developments and future directions. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 9–37.Google Scholar
- Dekeyser, S., & Watson, R. (2006). Extending Google docs to collaborate on research papers [technical report]. The University of Southern Queensland. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.90.3176&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- Edwards, J., & Baker, C. (2010). A case study: Google collaboration applications as online course teaching tools. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4) Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/edwards_1210.htm.
- Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 345–352). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Google (2013, August 19). Head back to school with Drive: student edition. Google Blog. Retrieved from https://drive.googleblog.com/2013/08/drivebts-teachers.html
- Hair, F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, L., & Black, C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hill.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, D. (2014, April 17). The benefits and dangers of choosing cloud-based file sharing. StateTech. Retrieved from http://www.statetechmagazine.com/article/2014/04/benefits-and-dangers-choosing-cloud-based-file-sharing.
- ISO 9241. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals. Part 11: Guidance on usability. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=16883.
- Kossman, R. (2012). Everything you need to know about cloud-based file sharing. Retrieved from http://searchcloudstorage.techtarget.com/feature/Everything-you-need-to-know-about-cloud-based-file-sharing.
- Link, L., Jurić, B., & Barać, L. (2013). Moodle and Elgg functionalities comparison: advantages and disadvantages. Proceedings from Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, Varaždin, the roatia, September 18–20. Retrieved from http://www.ceciis.foi.hr/app/public/conferences/1/papers2013/635.pdf
- Lord, N. (2016, October 12). Communicating the data security risks of file sharing & cloud storage. Digital Guardian, Retrieved from https://digitalguardian.com/blog/communicating-data-security-risks-file-sharing-cloud-storage.
- Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: a case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 33–48 Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1294/2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mijuskovic, A. & Ferati, M. (2015). User awareness of existing privacy and security risks when storing data in the cloud. In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning’15, (pp 268–273), 11–12 September. Retrieved from http://elearning-conf.eu/docs/cp15/paper-43.pdf.
- Miller, M. (2008). Cloud computing: web-based applications that change the way you work and collaborate online. Indiana: QUE Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ndubisi, O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: a comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behaviour and the technology acceptance model. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571–591.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, S., Molyneaux, H., & Gibson, K. (2010). A framework for analyzing social interaction using broadband visual communication technologies. In T. Dumova & R. Fiordo (Eds.), Handbook of research on social interaction technologies and collaboration software: concepts and trends (pp. 528–541). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pappas, C. (2014). How to use Google forms in eLearning. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/7-tips-use-google-forms-elearning
- Park, Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.Google Scholar
- Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Rienzo, T., & Han, B. (2009). Microsoft or Google web 2.0 tools for course management. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 123–127.Google Scholar
- Rozanski, P., & Haake, R. (2003). Curriculum and content: the many facets of HCI. Lafayette, IN: Paper presented at the 4th conference on information technology curriculum on information technology education.Google Scholar
- Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S. (2015). 15 ways to maximize your productivity with Google Drive. Retrieved from https://www.bettercloud.com/monitor/google-drive-productivity.
- Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. (2012). Google docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359–375.Google Scholar