Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proposing a new pedagogy-based website design: A usability test with lifelong learners

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to create a new pedagogy-based website based on the analysis of the needs of 7147 website users who visited the Thailand Cyber University (TCU) project website during 2011–2013. The study consisted of 4 stages: (1) examining learners’ needs and literature related to developing a lifelong learning framework, (2) designing a site structure and an interface for a pedagogy-based website, (3) conducting a usability test on the website with a sample of 204 users, and (4) modifying the website based on results of a website usability test. Analysis from t-test, one-way ANOVA, and LSD test show that the website is appropriate for users of all genders, ages, educational levels, positions, years of computer and Internet experience, computer possession, and experience in using the TCU website. The new pedagogy-based website design incorporating the lifelong learning framework was proposed by integrating the pedagogical aspects and the theoretical framework of the learning community, motivation, and interaction, while the technological aspects were integrated using an open source web portal, responsive design, and the Universal Design (UD) principle, which enables the website to work on a variety of devices and learning resources. The six elements of the new website include: (1) main page, (2) online courses, (3) media support, (4) learning resources, (5) conferences and seminars, and (6) ‘about us’ pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achawaamrung, C. (2011). Analysis of the Concept of Lifelong Learning for Sustainable Development of PhraBrahma Kunabhorn (Por. Or. Prayuto). Master of Education Thesis, Non-formal Education, Chulalongkorn University.

  • Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S., Fry, A., Deschenes, A., & McDonald, C. G. (2016). Strategies to improve the user experience. Serials Review, 42(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • December, J. (2007). Web Develop: Analyze. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.december.com/web/develop/ analyze.html. [2013, July 5].

  • Dick, W. D., & Reiser, R. A. (1989). Planning effective instruction. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. M. (2004). The educational software/website effectiveness survey. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(1), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, B. S., Thomas J. C., Randolph E, G. & Glenda A. G. (2008). Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom (5th ed). Boston: Thomson Course Technology.

  • Guo, K., Wang, H., & Ge, X. (2012). Lifelong learning capability of college students boosting by information technology on education. IERI Procedia, 2(2012), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (1997). FAQ for web-based training. Multimedia and Training Newsletter. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.brandon-hall.com/faq.htm [2015, March 16].

  • Horakunarak, A. (2007). Education for sustainable development. In Bangkok: the Centre of Excellence in education for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific. Thailand Environment Institute: Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoun, J. (1998). Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.library.cornell. edu/olinuris/ref/webcrit.html. [2015, May 15].

  • Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon students learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2010), 1183–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, B. H. (2005). E-Learning: Quick checklist. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khlaisang, J. (2010). Proposed models of appropriate website and courseware for e-learning in higher education: research based design models. Proceedings of the E-LEARN 2010- World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education, organized by the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Orlando, Florida, October 18–22, 2010.

  • Khlaisang, J. (2013). Analysis of the cultural factors affecting the proper design of website and electronic courseware for e-learning in ASEAN. AAOU Journal: Expanding the Frontiers of Knowledge Through Open and Distance Learning in Changing Societies, 8(2), 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khlaisang, J. (2015). Research-based guidelines for evaluating educational service website: case study of Thailand cyber university project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laal, M. (2013). Lifelong learning and technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83(2013), 980–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, J. (1998). A Basic Web Page and Its Elements. University of St. Thomas’. Minisota. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.issstthomas.edu/webtruth/basicpag.htm. [2013, May 15].

  • Laohajaratsang, T. (2002). Designing and Creating e-Learning. Chiang Mai: Business Organization of Teacher Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2007). Using web2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(2007), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Methakunnawut, P. (1997). Suggestions for Distance Learning Using Web-Based Instruction: Document for Course 271064: Curriculum and Instruction of Higher Education. Department of Higher Education: Chulalongkorn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, J. (2011). Perspectives on invisible learning. Education Futurist at Education Futures.

  • Nam, J. (2014). Understanding the motivation to use web portals. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(2014), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsook, P. (2000). Definition of Web-Based Instruction. Journal of Technology Education, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok Year 12, 34(April–June 2000). 53–56.

  • Nilsook, P. (2001). Evaluation of Web-Based Instruction. Academic Papers of Techno-Tabkewa., 3(3), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panich, V. (2012). Methods to create learning for twenty-first century learners. Bangkok: Sodsri Saritwong Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for twenty-first Century Skills, (2012). Framework Definitions. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/ storage/documents/P21-Framework -Definitions.pdf. [2013, May 15].

  • Ratanapean, V. (1999). Website learning: a new option for Thai education. Journal of Education, March–June 1999, 29–35.

  • Shackel, B. (1984). The concept of usability. In J. Bennet, Case, D., Sandelin, J., & Smith, M. (Ed.), Visual display terminals (pp. 45– 87). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading twenty-first century schools: harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(2000), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soward, S. W. (1997). Save the time of the surface evaluating web site of users. Library Hi Tech., 15(3–4), 155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thowfeek, M. H., & Salam, M. N. A. (2014). Students’ assessment on the usability of e-learning websites. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141(2014), 916–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, H. N. (2003). Evaluating Quality on the Net. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.hopetillman.com/ findqual.php. [2015, May 24].

  • Waterhouse, S. (2005). The Power of E-Learning: The Essential Guide for Teaching in the Digital Age. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H., & Poon, L. (2015). Thinking of everyone: responsive web Design for a Math OER project. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Gao, J., & Wu, C. (2014). Responsive web design and its use by an e-commerce website. P.L.P. Rau (Ed.): CCD/HCII 2014. LNCS, 8528, 509–519.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was based on the research study titled “Innovative Development of Educational Service Website: Cases Study of Thailand Cyber University Project” which was conducted by the author of this paper during 2014-2015. The research study was funded by the Thailand Cyber University Project, Office of Higher Education Commission, Ministry of Education. The author would like to thank the advisors, scholars, and experts involved for their advice and support in developing the new knowledge in this paper which would strengthen the field of educational technology and communications. The author hopes that the findings in this research can be expanded upon and utilized for further website implementation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jintavee Khlaisang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khlaisang, J. Proposing a new pedagogy-based website design: A usability test with lifelong learners. Educ Inf Technol 22, 1713–1735 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9514-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9514-9

Keywords

Navigation