Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Educational data mining acceptance among undergraduate students

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acceptance of Educational Data Mining (EDM) technology is on the rise due to, its ability to extract new knowledge from large amounts of students’ data. This knowledge is important for educational stakeholders, such as policy makers, educators, and students themselves to enhance efficiency and achievements. However, previous studies on EDM have focused more on technical aspects, such as evaluating methods and techniques, while ignoring the end-users’ acceptance of the technology. Realising its importance, this study has analysed the determinants that could influence the acceptance of EDM technology, particularly among undergraduate students since they are the most affected by the technology. For this reason, 11 hypotheses have been formulated based on determinants of technology readiness index (TRI) and technology acceptance model 3 (TAM3), which could render an in-depth insight regarding EDM acceptance. A survey was conducted on 211 undergraduate students from six public universities in Malaysia for a period of 6 months (May to October 2014) using questionnaires as the instrument to collect data to test the hypothesised relationships. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to analyse the proposed acceptance model, which was run using SmartPLS, version 3 software. The findings have revealed that ‘relevance for analysing’, ‘self-efficacy’, ‘facilitating conditions’, ‘perceived usefulness’, ‘perceived ease of use’, ‘optimism’ and ‘discomfort’ have influenced the acceptance of EDM technology among undergraduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course Signals at Purdue: Using Learning Analytics to Increase Student Success. Learning Analytics Knowledge (pp. 2–5).

  • Arnold, K. E., Tanes, Z., & King, A. S. (2010). Administrative perceptions of data-mining software signals: promoting student success and retention. The Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 6(2).

  • Arnold, K. E., Lonn, S., & Pistilli, M. D. (2014). An exercise in institutional reflection: The learning analytics readiness instrument (LARI), Paper presented at the 4th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Indianapolis: ACM.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S. J. D. (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems, Mining data for student models (pp. 323–337). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barneveld, A. Van, Arnold, K. E., & Campbell, J. P. (2012, Analytics in higher education: establishing a common language. EDUCAUSE, 1–11.

  • Behrend, T. S., Wiebe, E. N., London, J. E., & Johnson, E. C. (2011). Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagojević, M., & Micić, Ž. (2013). A web-based intelligent report e-learning system using data mining techniques. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 39(2), 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousbia, N., & Belamri, I. (2014). Educational data mining, Which contribution does EDM provide to computer-based learning environments? (pp. 3–28). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caison, A. L., Bulman, D., Pai, S., & Neville, D. (2008). Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian university. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(3), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo-Gonzalez, J., Cano-Montero, E. I., Urquia-Grande, E., & Muñoz-Colomina, C. I. (2015). Educational data mining for improving learning outcomes in teaching accounting within higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(5), 272–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998a). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1).

  • Chin, W. W. (1998b). Modern methods for business research, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling (pp. 295–336). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares, How to write up and report PLS analyses (pp. 655–690). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. T. H., Fang, S. C., & Tseng, C. C. (2010). Early versus potential adopters: exploring the antecedents of use intention in the context of retail service innovations. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(6), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. (2014). Big data and analytics in higher education: opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 904–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davcik, N. S. (2014). The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: a review and critique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(1), 47–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğmuş, N., & Esen, M. (2011). An investigation of the effects of technology readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Ohio: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, E., Romero, C., Ventura, S., & de Castro, C. (2011). A collaborative educational association rule mining tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Lets’ not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. S. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivarite data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M., Esat, F., Rocha, M., & Khatieb, Z. (2007). Introducing students to business intelligence: acceptance and perceptions of OLAP software. Issues in Information Science and Information Technology, 4(1), 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T. C. K., Liu, C. C., & Chang, D. C. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption of data mining tools. International Journal of Information Management, 32(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S. W., & Cheng, M. J. (2013). Are you ready for knowledge sharing? An empirical study of virtual communities. Computers & Education, 62, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan, A. U., & Contreras, V. (2011). Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 845–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, C. (2013). The perspective of a revised TRAM on social capital building: the case of Facebook usage. Information & Management, 50(4), 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaled, M. S. F., & Mohammed-Issa, R. M. J. (2015). Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, K. M., Liu, C. F., & Ma, C. C. (2013). An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(8), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. L. (2008). Technology readiness, internet self-efficacy and computing experience of professional accounting students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 25(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaqat, A., Mohsen, A., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., & Marek, H. (2013). Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: an empirical study. Computers & Education, 62, 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljander, V., Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J., & van Riel, A. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. S. C., & Chang, H. C. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality, 21(4), 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merhi, M. I. (2015). Factors influencing higher education students to adopt podcast: an empirical study. Computers & Education, 83, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, H. R., & Barko, C. D. (2003). Key factors for achieving organizational data-mining success. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(4), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, H. R., & Barko, C. D. (2010). Organizational data mining. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1041–1048). Springer.

  • Noornina, D., Ramayah, T., & Koay, A. H. (2002a). Data mining in the banking industry: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the International Conference 2002. Internet, Economy and Business (p. 6). Kuala Lumpur.

  • Noornina, D., Ramayah, T., & Mei, L. L. (2002b). Readiness to adopt data mining technologies: an exploratory study of telecommunication employees in Malaysia. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 25(69), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S. J. D., Gowda, S., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). Population validity for educational data mining models: a case study in affect detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 487–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. a. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: a systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, E., & Kim, K. J. (2014). An integrated adoption model of mobile cloud services: exploration of key determinants and extension of technology acceptance model. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). Educational data mining: a survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1432–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramayah, T., Noornina, D., & Ruzi, P. A. (2007). Employees’ data mining readiness in the Malaysian insurance industry: a preliminary study. International Journal of Management Practices & Contemporary Thoughts, 2(1), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, R., Ranjan, J., & Bhatnagar, V. (2013). Critical success factor for implementing data mining in higher education: Indian perspective. International Journal of Computational Systems Engineering, 1(3), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 40(6), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2011). Handbook of educational data mining. Minnesota: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Zaldivar, V. A., Pardo, A., Burgos, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Monitoring student progress using virtual appliances: a case study. Computers and Education, 58(4), 1058–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roumeliotis, M., & Maria, T. (2014). Perception and adoption of technology based services by students of higher education. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(3), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2005). Research methods for business - a skill building approach (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). ACM.

  • Summak, M. S., Bağlıbel, M., & Samancıoğlu, M. (2010). Technology readiness of primary school teachers: a case study in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2671–2675.

  • Teo, T. (2011). Technology acceptance in education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsikriktsis, N. (2004). A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: a replication and extension. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technonology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44(2), 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P., Li, N., & Sun, H. (2006). Affective quality and cognitive absorption: Extending technology acceptance research. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Defence Technology, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Muslihah Wook

  2. Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

    Zawiyah M. Yusof & Mohd Zakree Ahmad Nazri

Authors
  1. Muslihah Wook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zawiyah M. Yusof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohd Zakree Ahmad Nazri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muslihah Wook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wook, M., Yusof, Z.M. & Nazri, M.Z.A. Educational data mining acceptance among undergraduate students. Educ Inf Technol 22, 1195–1216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9485-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9485-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation