Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 883–899 | Cite as

Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students

  • Jalal IsmailiEmail author
  • El Houcine Ouazzani Ibrahimi


Assistive Technology (AT) revolutionized the process of learning for special needs students during the past three decades. Thanks to this technology, accessibility and educational inclusion became attainable more than any time in the history of special education. Meanwhile, assistive technology devices remain unreachable for a large number of students with disabilities, especially in under-developed and developing countries like Morocco due to a number of factors, especially, availability and affordability. Mobile learning, using smartphones and tablets in particular, may provide alternative solutions as special education tools in such countries. Additionally, open source platforms, particularly Google play store with all the applications it accommodates for disabled people, may obviate the need for monofunctional, sometimes expensive, AT devices. The present paper sets out to investigate potentials of using smartphones and tablets as alternative learning tools for assistive technology devices within formal and informal learning environments. It compares seven free Google Play medical apps with seven assistive technology devices at the level of functionality and affordability. The apps are of relevance to cases of physical as well as mental disabilities, namely hearing impairment, visual impairment, autism and speech articulation disorders.


e-learning m-learning Assistive technology Special needs students Medical apps 


  1. Akpan, J., & Beard, L. (2013). Overview of assistive technology possibilities for teachers to enhance academic outcomes of all students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 113–118.Google Scholar
  2. Assembly, U. G. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations, Treaty Series, 1577(3).Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: a review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai, Z., Vail, C. O., & Ayres, K. M. (2014). Using an ipad application to promote early literacy development in young children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 0022466913517554.Google Scholar
  6. Chmiliar, L. (2014). Learning with the iPad in Early Childhood. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 579–582). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Chmiliar, L., & Anton, C. (2015). The iPad as a mobile assistive technology device. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 9(3), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chun, D. (2015). Intercultural understanding in the new mobile learning environment. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 10(2).Google Scholar
  9. Commission Spéciale Education Formation. (1999). Charte nationale D’éducation et de formation (pp. 47-48–58-59).Google Scholar
  10. Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El Hallouly, H. (2014). وضعية الاطفال المعاقين في المغرب | Retrieved 29 September 2015, from
  12. Fernández-López, Á., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M. J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M. L., & Martínez-Segura, M. J. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2), 2–11.Google Scholar
  14. Ha, E., & Wagner, D. (2013). Do android users write about electric sheep? Examining consumer reviews in google play. In Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2013 IEEE (pp. 149–157). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamidi, F., Baljko, M., Kunic, T., & Feraday, R. (2014). Do-It-Yourself (DIY) assistive technology: A communication board case study. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 287–294). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Haut-Commissariat au Plan,. (2009). Population en situation de handicap au Maroc; Profil Demographique Et Socio-economique (pp. 9–10). Haut-Commissariat au Plan. Royaume du Maroc.Google Scholar
  17. Hollier, S., & Murray, I. (2006). The evolution of E-Inclusion: Technology in education for the vision-impaired. GLADNET Collection, 341.Google Scholar
  18. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: from content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lam, J., Yau, J., & Cheung, S. K. (2010). A review of mobile learning in the mobile age. In Hybrid learning (pp. 306–315). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  20. Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Singh, N. N. (2012). Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, C. C., & Hong, Y. C. (2007). Providing hearing‐impaired students with learning care after classes through smart phones and the GPRS network. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, J., Sarkar, M. K., & Chakraborty, G. (2013). Feature-based Sentiment analysis on android app reviews using SAS® text miner and SAS® sentiment analysis studio. In Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2013 Conference (Vol. 250).Google Scholar
  23. Ludi, S., Timbrook, M., & Chester, P. (2014). A tablet-based approach to facilitate the viewing of classroom lecture by low vision students. In Computers helping people with special needs (pp. 591–596). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Narasimhan N., & Leblois A. (2015) Making mobile phones and services accessible for persons with disabilities. The International Telecommunication Union and G3ict – The global initiative for inclusive ICTs,
  25. Obiodu, V., & Obiodu, E. (2012). An empirical review of the top 500 medical apps in a European android market. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 1(4), 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ok, M. W., Kim, M. K., Kang, E. Y., & Bryant, B. R. (2015). How to find good apps an evaluation rubric for instructional apps for teaching students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 1053451215589179.Google Scholar
  27. Shanmugapriya, M., & Tamilarasi, A. (2011). Designing an m-learning application for a ubiquitous learning environment in the android based mobile devices using web services. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 2(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
  28. Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning (pp. 233–249). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1–12.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. El Hallouly, H. (2014). وضعية الاطفال المعاقين في المغرب | Retrieved 29 August 2015, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Discourse, Creativity and Society: Perception and Implications, Faculty of Arts and Humanities Fes SaisSidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah UniversityFezMorocco

Personalised recommendations