Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 255–269 | Cite as

Social teaching: Student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education

Article

Abstract

The traditional teaching methodologies employed within universities, comprising of lectures and seminars, have come to be scrutinised for their impersonal approach. Recently, social media and networking sites have become increasingly popular as learning and teaching resources in higher education, providing students with increased opportunities for educational engagement. Whilst research has examined the effects of including social media in class and whether it assists students in academic engagement, it remains to be seen whether social media is understood to affect student attitudes towards their learning experiences. Subsequently, this research endeavours to understand student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education and seeks to establish whether the inclusion of social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, can impact on student motivation and goal orientation. Whilst research in this area is increasing, this paper provides valuable insight into student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education, whether they believe motivation and goals to have been affected by it, and the broader reaching consequences of its inclusions with regard to departmental interaction.

Keywords

Social media goal orientation motivation Twitter Facebook Higher education 

References

  1. Archer, J., & Scevak, J. J. (1998). Enhancing Students’ Motivation to Learn : achievement goals in university classrooms Enhancing Students’ Motivation to Learn : achievement goals in university class. Educational Psychology, 18(2), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: technology as a lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49, 3–6.Google Scholar
  3. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 3–7.Google Scholar
  4. Collis, B. (1998). New didactics for university instruction: why and how? Computers & Education, 31, 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2007). Learning with weblogs: enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Damon, W. & Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology Volume 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development 5th ed., (pp. 1017–1095). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grodeka, K. & Wild, F. (2008). Introduction In Grodeka, K. Wild, F. & Kieslinger, B. (Eds.), How to use Social Software in Higher Education, Wydawnicto Naukowe Akapit, 6. Retrieved from: http://www.icamp.eu/. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
  10. Hess, G. (2008). Collaborative course design: not my course, not their course, but our course. Washburn Law Journal, 47(2), 367–387.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Howe, K. R. (1992). Getting over the quantitative- qualitative debate. American Journal of Education, 100(2), 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Junco, R., Heilbergert, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolić-Vehovec, S., Rončević, B., & Bajšanski, I. (2008). Motivational Components of self-regulated learning and reading strategy use in university students: The role of goal orientation patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Likert, R. A. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitdues. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.Google Scholar
  18. Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today’s higher education faculty use social media, Pearson Learning Solutions & Babson Survey Research Group, Boston.Google Scholar
  19. Nicol, D. J., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Rankin, M. (2009). Some general comments on the “Twitter Experiment.” Retrieved from http://www.utdallas.edu/~mrankin/usweb/twitterconclusions.htm. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
  22. Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneidert, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1979). The open and closed question. American Sociological Review, 44, 692–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievments, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education. (2011). Higher Education Academy, Guild HE, Universities UK. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/recognition-accreditation/uk-professional-standards-framework-ukpsf. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
  26. Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulriksen, L. (2009). The implied student. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wentzel, K. (1991). Social and academic goals at school: motivation and achievement in context. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 185–212.Google Scholar
  29. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang, C.-C., Tsai, I.-C., Kim, B., Cho, M.-H., & Laffey, J. M. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students’ academic motvation and social ability in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 227–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics, School of Social SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations