Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 177–193 | Cite as

Impact of MOODLE platform on the pedagogy of students and staff: Cross-curricular comparison

  • Emerson Abraham Jackson


In the current Information Age, technology is taking the lead in moving teaching and learning beyond that which was once viewed as typically didactic approach to knowledge acquisition. The outcome of this research paper have explored the importance of MOODLE learning platform and its contribution in promoting flexible teaching, and the need for supported action (through bespoke CPD) to assist teachers / tutors develop differentiated learning resources that has a dual purpose of improving flexibility in learning and assessment outcomes for students. There is also the need to foster collaborative working partnership between curriculum areas through management intervention in appointing dedicated ILT Champions to increase teacher confidence in developing interactive teaching and learning resources. In order to make MOODLE learning platform an effective medium for the enhancement of teaching and learning, it is recommended that management incorporate into the college strategic plan(s), a focused induction at the beginning of the academic year for students to familiarise themselves with relevant features of learning / interactive tools available on the platform.


MOODLE Collaboration Socialisation Qualification Subjectification E-Learning 



To start with, I am very grateful to the ‘Education and Training Foundation (ETF)’ for the opportunity provided to me in the capacity as a ‘Research Fellow’. I am particularly grateful to management at Christ the King College (CTK) for allowing time remission (three residential stay at the University of Sunderland) to engage with fellow researchers, and to my colleagues at CTK and students, for their time spent in responding to questions and airing concerns about their usage of MOODLE technology. Last but not least, to the SUNCETT team at the University of Sunderland for their fantastic input throughout the process leading up to the annual RDF conference held in London on the 9th July 2015.


  1. Attwell, G. & Hughesm, J. (2010). Pedagogic approaches to using technology for learning: literature review. Available at: <> [Accessed: 2 Feb 2015].
  2. Becta (2006). The ICT and e-learning in FE survey 2006: key findings. Available at: <> [Accessed: 1 Feb 2015].
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, and democracy (Interventions: Education, Philosophy, and Culture). UK: Paradigm Publisher.Google Scholar
  4. Bingimlas, K. A. "Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature." EURASIA Online 5 [3] (2009): 235-245. Available at: <> [Accessed: 16th February, 2015].
  5. Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (2001). Doing Research/Reading Research: Re-Interrogating Education: A Mode of Interrogation for Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A. (n/d). Triangulation. Available at: <>. Accessed: 29 Aug 2015.
  7. Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipatari, M. (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation (Full Report), Durham University. Available at: <> [Accessed: 15 Feb 2015].
  8. Jackson, E. A. (2015 - forthcoming) M-Learning Devices and their impact on Postgraduate Researchers Scope for improved Integration in the Research Community.Google Scholar
  9. Joseph, J. E. "The barriers of using eduction technology for optimising the educational experience of learners." TOJNED 3 (2) (2013): 51-57. TOJNET Online. Available at: <> [16th February 2015].
  10. Judges (2011). The ILT Report: A comprehensive collection of comments about the useof Information Learning Technology (ILT), includingVirtual Learning Environments (VLEs), inFurther Education (FE) and Sixth Form CollegeOfsted Reports from inspections carried out in 2010. Available at: <> [Accessed: 2 Feb 2015].
  11. Laurillard, D., & Deepwell, M. (2014). ATL Survey on the effective use of learning technology in education. Available at: <> [Accessed: 16 Feb 2015].
  12. OFSTED (2014). Inspecting Schools: Framework 2014. Available at: <> [Accessed: 12 Mar 2015].
  13. O’Leary, M. (2014a). Classroom observation: A guide to the effective classroom of teaching and learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. O’Leary, M. (2014b). To grade or not to grade? The use of lesson observation in assessing and understanding teaching and learning. Available at: <>. Accessed: 25 Aug 2015.
  15. Quality Improvement Agency (2008). Skills Check: Assessment for Learning, Initial Assessment and Diagnostic Assessment (Online). Available at: <> [Accessed; 18 Feb 2015].
  16. Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P. & Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research methodology (Online). <Available at:> [Accessed: 18 Feb 2015].
  17. Robson, C. (1997). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). UK: Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
  18. Steps (2007). Study of the impacts of technology in primary schools: Executive summary). Available at: <> [Accessed: 3 Jan 2015].
  19. Striker, L., & Pollock, C. (2003). Optimising the interaction of children with information and communication technology (Citation). Available at: [Accessed: 16 Feb 2015].
  20. TLRP (2006). Improving teaching and learning in schools: a commentary by the teaching and learning research programme. Available at: <> [Accessed 31 Jan 2015].

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DartfordUK
  2. 2.Chartered Institute of ForestersEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations