Seeing the system: Dynamics and complexity of technology integration in secondary schools
- 1.1k Downloads
This paper introduces system dynamics modeling to understand, visualize and explore technology integration in schools, through the development of a theoretical model of technology-related change in teachers’ practice. Technology integration is a dynamic social practice, within the social system of education. It is difficult, if not nearly impossible, for the human mind to fully conceptualize complex social systems. Therefore, it is necessary to use conceptual frameworks designed to examine these phenomena. The model presented in this paper draws together known factors of integration and findings from a large-scale technology initiative in Australia to create a preliminary casual-loop model of technology integration in secondary school teaching. The preliminary model illustrates feedback and multiple effects in the system of education. The use of system models can potentially support a shift from focusing on teachers’ technology use to student outcomes, and the feedback loop of students’ technology use on teachers’ practice. Implications for technology integration, teacher change and learning are discussed.
KeywordsTechnology integration Educational change Complex systems Dynamic systems Systems thinking
- Alessi, S. (2000). The application of system dynamics in elementary and secondary school curricular. Retrieved from http://www.c5.cl/ieinvestiga/actas/ribie2000/charlas/alessi.htm.
- De Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In Engineering self-organising systems (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Finnigan, J. (2005). The science of complex systems. Australasian Science, 26(5), 32–34.Google Scholar
- Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behaviour of social systems. Technology Review, 73(3), 52–68.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Howard, S. K., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). More than beliefs: Subject areas and teachers’ integration of laptops in secondary teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 360–369. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12139
- Howard, S. K., & Mozejko, A. (2013). DER-NSW Evaluation: Conclusions on student and teacher engagement and ICT use. Sydney: Department of Education and Communities, NSW.Google Scholar
- Howard, S. K., & Thompson, K. (2013). Systems of integration: Using system dynamics to understand technology integration in learning and teaching. In European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill.Google Scholar
- Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–68.Google Scholar
- Morecroft, J. (2007). Strategic modelling and business dynamics. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Ossimitz, G. (1997). The development of systems thinking skills using system dynamics modeling tools. Klagenfurt. Retrieved from http://wwwu.uni-klu.ac.at/gossimit/sdyn/gdm_eng.htm.
- Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Thompson, K., & Reimann, P. (2010). Patterns of use of an agent-based model and a system dynamics model: The application of patterns of use and the impacts on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 54(2), 392–403.Google Scholar