I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs
The goal of this research was to examine how Israeli chemistry teachers at high school level use Facebook groups to facilitate learning. Two perspectives were used: Teachers’ TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) and the self-efficacy beliefs of chemistry teachers for using CLFG (chemistry learning Facebook groups). Three different case studies were chosen and qualitative and quantitative research tools were used to learn about the teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and knowledge. More specifically, a validated questionnaire for measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for using Facebook and for integrating Facebook into teaching was developed. We show that the initial beliefs (not based on a real acquaintance of Facebook) were replaced by more realistic efficacy-beliefs after the teachers started to work with the CLFG and that the technological support provided to each teacher, together with their mastery experience, supported the development of strong self-efficacy beliefs regarding the use of CLFG. Teachers’ TPACK was investigated by analyzing their interviews and the interactions in their CLFG. We found that the notion regarding what constitutes learning in the CLFG had not changed during the experiment but rather, the teachers knew better how they can facilitate this leaning. In addition they better integrated links to videos and visualizations that supported understanding abstract chemistry concepts. Interestingly, the intervention that was conducted did not influence teachers’ perceptions of learning; however, it was found to serve as an additional tool for supporting their self-efficacy beliefs by providing vicarious experience for the teachers. We therefore recommend performing a longer intervention in the future.
KeywordsChemistry education Teacher professional development Teaching self-efficacy Beliefs TPACK SNS Science education
Chemistry Learning Facebook Groups
Information and Communication Technology
Learning Management System
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Social Networks Sites
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 269–285. doi: 10.1039/c3rp00001j.
- Blonder, R., Benny, N., & Jones, M. G. (2014). Teaching self-efficacy of science teachers. In R. H. Evans, J. Luft, C. Czerniak & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 3–15). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought: The languages we speak affect our perceptions of the world. Scientific American, February, 63–65.Google Scholar
- Cakiroglu, J., Capa-Aydin, Y., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2012). Science teaching efficacy beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (24th ed., pp. 477–495). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (Sixthth ed., pp. 253–263). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
- Costa, A. L., Marzano, R. (1987). Teaching the language of thinking. Educational Leadership (October), 29–33.Google Scholar
- De Jong, O., Blonder, R., & Oversby, J. P. (2013). How to balance chemistry education between observing of phenomena and thinking in models. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Chemistry education: A practical guide and textbook for teachers, teacher trainees and student teachers (pp. 97–126). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 47–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2015). Teacher-Student Relationship in the Facebook-era. In P. Isaias, P. Kommers, T. Issa (Eds.). The evolution of the internet in the business sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145-172). PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/articles/v9i1science1.pdf.Google Scholar
- HAARETZ. (2013). Israelis ‘like’ Facebook more than any other nation. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/business/israelis-like-facebook-more-than-any-other-nation.premium-1.525547.
- Hammond, T. C., & Manfra, M. M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 160–185.Google Scholar
- Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- ISTRATEGYLABS (2014). 3 Million teens leave Facebook in 3 years: The 2014 Facebook demographic report. Retrieved from http://istrategylabs.com/2014/01/3-million-teens-leave-facebook-in-3-years-the-2014-facebook-demographic-report/.
- Kurtz, G. (2011). Assimilation of ICT in Israel: Challenges and implementation. In D. Chen & G. Kurtz (Eds.), ICT, learning and teaching (pp. 11–32). Or Yehuda: The Center fpr Academic Studies (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 175–185. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200118830/fulltextPDF?accountid=14950.Google Scholar
- Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 33–48.Google Scholar
- Nana. (2014). 10 years of facebook: A decade in figures. Retrieved from http://net.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1035380 (in Hebrew).
- Schroeder, J., Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4), Retrieved from http://gator.uhd.edu/%7Ewilliams/AT/ChemOfFB.htm.
- Shroyer, G., Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (2014). Measurement of science teachers’ efficacy beliefs. In R. H. Evans, J. Luft, C. Czerniak, & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 103–118). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Woolfolk Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. W. A. Wigfield (Ed.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627–653). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar