Skip to main content

Adolescents and Cyber Bullying: The Precaution Adoption Process Model

Abstract

A survey of adolescents (N = 1,488) documented Facebook use and experience with cyber bullying. The study found that 84 % of adolescents (middle school through college undergraduates) use Facebook, and that most users log on daily. While 30 % of the sample reported being cyber bullied, only 12.5 % quit using the site, and only 18 % told a parent or school official about the abuse. Up to 75 % of middle school Facebook users have experienced cyber bullying. The current study was the first to apply the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to cyber bullying or to test the model with children and adolescents. Results suggest that most adolescents are aware of cyber bullying and acknowledge it as a problem in their school. About half of the adolescents did not progress beyond Stage 2 of the PAPM (aware of the problem, but haven’t really thought about it). Adolescents also exhibited optimistic bias, believing they were less likely than peers to become cyber bullied. Implications for prevention education are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act, State of New Jersey (2011). http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bills/AL10/122_.PDF

  2. Blalock, S., DeVellis, R., Giorgino, K., DeVellis, B., Gold, D., & Dooley, M. (1996). Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior. Health Psychology, 15(2), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borrelli, B., McQuaid, E., Novak, S., Hammond, S., & Becker, B. (2010). Motivating Latino caregivers of children with asthma to quit smoking: a randomized trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bullyingstatistics.org (2012). Cyberbullying statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/content/cyber-bullying-statistics.html

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Youth suicide. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/youth_suicide.html

  6. Chou, H. T., & Edge, N. (2012). They are happier and having better lives than I am: the impact of using facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clemow, L., Costanza, M., Haddad, W., Luckmann, R., White, M., Klaus, D., & Stoddard, A. (2000). Underutilizers of mammography screening today: characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22(1), 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costanza, M., Luckmann, R., White, M., Rosal, M., LaPelle, N., & Cranos, C. (2009). Moving mammogram-reluctant women to screening: a pilot study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(3), 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2009). Cyberbullying: intervention and prevention strategies. National Association of School Psychologists, 38, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer, R., Hall, K., Portnoy, D., Ling, B., Han, P., & Klein, W. (2011). Relationships among health perceptions vary depending on stage of readiness for colorectal cancer screening. Health Psychology, 30(5), 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Mirror, mirror on my facebook wall: effects of exposure to facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grobe, D., Douthitt, R., & Zepeda, L. (1999). Consumer risk perception profiles regarding recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH). Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(2), 254–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hrastinski, S., & Aghaee, N. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? an explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobson, S. A. (2011). HIV/AIDS interventions in an aging U.S. population. Health & Social Work, 36(2), 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Junco, R., & Cotten, S. (2012). No a 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers and Education, 59(2), 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LaPelle, N., Costanza, M., Luckmann, R., Rosal, M., White, M., & Stark, J. (2008). Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study. Journal of Cancer Education, 23(2), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manuel, N. R. (2011). Cyber-bullying: its recent emergence and needed legislation to protect adolescent victims. Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 13(1), 219–252.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehrotra, P., Noar, S., Zimmerman, R., & Palmgreen, P. (2009). Demographic and personality factors as predictors of HIV/STD partner-specific risk perceptions: Implications for interventions. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. National Crime Prevention Council (2012). Cyber bullying law and legal definition. Retrieved from http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/cyber-bullying/

  20. Peterson, J., Skeem, J., & Manchak, S. (2011). If you want to know, consider asking: how likely is it that patients will hurt themselves in the future? Psychological Assessment, 233, 626–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reyes-Velazquez, W., & Hoffman, E. (2011). Toward reducing the diabetes pandemic: college students’ perspectives of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum, 24(3), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts, M., Gibbons, F., Gerrard, M., & Alert, M. (2011). Optimism and adolescent perception of skin cancer risk. Health Psychology, 30(6), 810–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma, M. (2007). Precaution adoption process model: need for experimentation in alcohol and drug education. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 51(3), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharp, K., & Thombs, D. (2003). A cluster analytic study of osteoprotective behavior in undergraduates. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(4), 364–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Strom, P., Strom, R., Wingate, J., Kraska, M., & Beckert, T. (2012). Cyberbullying: assessment of student experience for continuous improvement planning. National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Bulletin, 96(2), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh, S., Dignan, M., & Caldwell, G. (2007). The PAPM, diffusion theory, and violent death surveillance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(5), 451–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein, N. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstein, N. (1989). Perceptions of personal susceptibility to harm. In V. Mays, G. Albee, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Psychological approaches to the primary prevention of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (pp. 142–167). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein, N., Lyon, J., Sandman, P., & Cuite, C. (1998). Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing. Health Psychology, 17(5), 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolfers, M., de Zwart, O., & Kok, G. (2011). Adolescents in the Netherlands underestimate risk for sexually transmitted infections and deny the need for sexually transmitted infection testing. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 25(5), 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoder, C. & Stutzman, F. (2011). Identifying social capital in the Facebook interface. Paper presented at Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Chapin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapin, J. Adolescents and Cyber Bullying: The Precaution Adoption Process Model. Educ Inf Technol 21, 719–728 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9349-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Cyber bullying
  • Precaution adoption process model
  • Optimistic bias