Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

mLearning: Anytime, anywhere learning transcending the boundaries of the educational box

Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the age of our mobile learning, an impending onus is placed on educational institutions to embrace this technological innovation that is widely accepted, used, and available globally. The clear societal value of mobile technology as a productivity tool for engagement, creation, and collaboration has generated a new need for education to revisit existing instructional paradigms constrained by physical walls and time. Mobile learning (mLearning) creates a venue to promote a culture of participation where learners and leaders alike can engage in combined efforts with multiplicative outcomes of greater success. This article explores the factors that national, state, and local educational organizations must understand in order to make steps toward successful integration of mLearning technology. Characteristics necessary for effective and efficient use of mLearning strategies for educators are also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, Prabhat (2009). The Silver Bullet for Your Learning Organization. CIT Mobile Learning.

  • Atkins, D. E., Bennett, J., Seely Brown, J., Chopra, A. Dede, C., Fishman, B., Gomez, L., Honey, M., Kafai, Y., Luftglass, M., Pea, R., Pellegrino, J., Rose, D., Thille, C., and Williams, B. National Education Technology Plan 2010. (NETP). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham, J. VizWiz. (2011) Rochester Human Computer Interaction (ROC HCI). Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/vizwiz/id439686043?mt=8.

  • Brink, J. (2011). M-Learning: The future of training technology. Training and Development, 27–29.

  • Devaney, L. (2011). An annual report pegs mobile learning, and cloud computing as Imminent. eSchool News. Retrieved from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2011/05/17/annual-report-pegs-mobile-learning-cloud-computing-as-imminent/.

  • Duncan, A. (2010). Beyond the Bubble Tests: The Next Generation of Assessments. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/beyond-bubble-tests-next-generation-assessments-secretary-arne-duncans-remarks-state-l.

  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passarini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concerns within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Proceedings of the thirteenth Americas conference on information systems. Colorado: Keystone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, D. P. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. In A. Inkeles, J. Colemen, & N. Smelser (Eds.), Annual review of sociology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (2011). Is it time to reconsider Public Enemy #1 status of mobile devices in school? Project Tomorrow. Retrieved from http://speakupblog.tomorrow.org/?p=284.

  • Float. (2011). Float mobile learning. Retrieved from http://floatlearning.com/about/.

  • Grunwald, P., & Lippincott, R. M. (2011) The more we use it the more we love it. The Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2011/06/17/The-More-We-Use-It-the-More-We-Love-It.aspx?Page=1.

  • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, A., Herrington, J., & Mantei, J. (2009). Design principles for mobile learning. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 129–138). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research Development, 55, 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Smith, R., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2010). 2010 horizon report: K-12 edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. (1963). The study of society: A unified approach. Homewood: Irwin-Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughtry, N., & Dillon, S. (2008). Learning to use PDAs to enhance teaching: the perspectives of preservice physical educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 433–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. E. (2001). Computer-based support for science education materials developers in Africa: Exploring potentials. Ipskamp: PrintPartners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, M. J. (2004). Privacy, trust, and disclosure: exploring barriers to electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4), 00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoLeNET (2011). Learning and skills council (UK). Retrieved from http://www.molenet.org.uk/.

  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, M. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, B., Lui, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science (online). Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2011/07/13/science.1207745.

  • The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007, November 29). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=120.

  • The_Light_Triton. Oregon Trail (Video Game 1971) - IMDb. The Internet Movie Database (IMDb). Retrieved from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0857332/.

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2011). Message design for mobile learning: learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01214.x.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Keengwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shippee, M., Keengwe, J. mLearning: Anytime, anywhere learning transcending the boundaries of the educational box. Educ Inf Technol 19, 103–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9211-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9211-2

Keywords

Navigation