Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing primary school children collaborative learning experiences in maths via a 3D virtual environment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last years there has been a growing use of 3D virtual environments for educational purposes. Many studies advocate the integration of these environments in the daily teaching practice of various subjects. This requires innovative design in order create the appropriate affective/ pedagogical conditions as well as the development and use of well-structured activities in order to achieve effective collaborative learning. This paper presents an exploratory study in which collaborative learning strategies and cognitive apprenticeship models act as the pedagogical framework to facilitate learning and collaboration. The context is the teaching of mathematics in primary education via a 3D virtual environment. Specifically, we focus on evaluating students’ engagement (behavioral, affective and cognitive) in the collaborative learning process as they learn fractional concepts in a meaningful way. The findings show that a 3D virtual environment can support collaborative learning in primary school through its ability to enhance students’ engagement (behavioral, affective and cognitive) in the collaborative learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2006). Reflexive play spaces: A 21st Century pedagogy. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Chicago, IL. http://inkido.indiana.edu/research/onlinemanu/papers/rps_barab29.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2010.

  • Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Thomas, M., Jackson, C., & Tuzun, H. (2007a). Our designs and the social agendas they carry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 263–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., Dodge, T., Tuzun, H., Job-Sluder, K., Jackson, C., Arici, A., Job-Sluder, L., Carteaux, R., Jr., Gilbertson, J., & Heiselt, C. (2007b). The Quest Atlantis Project: A socially-responsive play space for learning. In B. E. Shelton & D. Wiley (Eds.), The educational design and use of simulation computer games (pp. 159–186). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., Dodge, T., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Narratizing disciplines and disciplinizing narratives: games as 21st century curriculum. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 2(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, P. (2012). Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: a mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment. Journal of Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2004). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum. Part 1: rationals as measurements. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carassa, A., Morganti, F., & Tirassa, M. (2004). Movement, action, and situation: Presence in virtual environments. In M. Alcaniz Raya & B. Rey Solaz (Eds.), Proceedings of presence 2004 (pp. 7–12). Valencia: Editorial Universidad Politecnica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthon, S., Harris, A., & Jones, R. (2010). Cognitive apprenticeship in an online research lab for graduate students in psychology. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 5(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H., Yang, J. C., Shen, S., & Jeng, M. C. (2007). A desktop virtual reality earth motion system in astronomy education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: motivation, issues, opportunities. Journal of Computers and Education, 49, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Journal of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6–46.

  • Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crosier, J. K., Cobb, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science. Journal of Computers & Education, 38(1–3), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on second life: the case of SecondDMI. Computers in Education, 52(1), 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., & Poggi, C. (2003). SEE (Shrine Educational Experience): an Online Cooperative 3D Environment Supporting Innovative Educational Activities. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2003 (pp. 1527–1534). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., & Poggi, C. (2004). Learning by playing. An edutainment 3D environment for schools. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2004 (pp. 1313–1320). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., & Poggi, C. (2005). 3D worlds for edutainment: Educational, relational and organizational principles. In Proceedings of PerCom Workshops 2005 - IEEE International Workshop on Pervasive eLearning (pp. 291–295). New York: IEEE Press.

  • Di Blas, N., Poggi, C., & Reeves, C. T, (2006). Collaborative learning in a 3D virtual environment: design factors and evaluation results. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 127–133). Bloomington, Indiana.

  • Dieterle, E., & Clarke, J. (2007). Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking (2nd ed.). Hershey: Idea Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P.A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen.

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (1996). Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds). Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 401–407). Lisbon, Portugal.

  • Dillenbourg, P., Jarvela, S., & Fisher, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faggiano, E., Pertichino, M., & Roselli, T. (2005). CSCL in Math Education. In: Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Indianapolis.

  • Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive–withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 421–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, and state of the evidence. Journal of Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, T., Guerrero, L. A., Collazos, C., Pino, J. A., & Ochoa, S. (2003). Supporting JIGSAW-type Collaborative Learning. System Sciences, (p. 8). Hawaii.

  • Garzotto, F., Forfori, M. (2006). Hyperstories and social interaction in 2D and 3D edutainment spaces for children, In Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. Odense, Denmark.

  • Ghefaili, A. (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship, technology, and the contextualization of learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing, Design& Online Learning, 4, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Creating opportunities for students to reinvent mathematics. In Proceedings of the ICME 10. Kopenhagen, Denmark.

  • Hernandez-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernandez, E. D., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, U., Bischoff, M., & Blakowski, G. (2002). Jigsaw Method in the context of CSCL. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1, 789–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janvier, C. (1987). Translation processes in mathematics education. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 27–32). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2005). Place-based storytelling tools: A new look at Monticello. In D. Bearman & J. Trant (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2005. Selected Papers from an International Conference (pp. 165–172). Toronto: Archives & Museums Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, M. (2000). Construct3D: a virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelhut, D., Dede, C., Clarke, J., Nelson, B., & Bowman, C. (2007). Studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. In E. Baker, J. Dickieson, W. Wulfeck, & H. O’Neil (Eds.), Assessment of problem solving using simulations (pp. 37–58). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Q., Wong, N., & Lam, C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: development of instrument and validation of construct. Journal of Mathematics. Education Research, 15(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis, A., Tsiatsos, Th, Terzidou, Th, & Pomportsis, A. (2010). Fostering collaborative learning in second life: metaphors and affordances. Journal of Computer & Education, 55, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordaki, M., Siempos, H., & Daradoumis, T. (2009). Collaborative learning design within open source e-learning systems: lessons learned from an empirical study. In G. Magoulas (Ed.), E-Infrastructures and Technologies for Lifelong Learning: Next Generation Environments, IDEA-Group Publishing.

  • Lee, M. J. W. (2009). How can 3D virtual worlds be used to support collaborative learning? An analysis of cases from the literature. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 5(1), 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linser, R., Ree-Lindstad, N., & Vold, T. (2007). Black blizzard: Designing role-play simulations for education. In Proceedings of International Educational Technology Conference (pp. 354–359). Nicosia, North Cyprus: Near East University.

  • Lucey-Roper, M. (2006). Discover Babylon: Creating a vivid user experience by exploiting features of video games and uniting museum and library collections. In J. Trant and D. Bearman (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2006: Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2006/papers/lucey-roper/lucey-roper.html. Accessed 26 June 2010.

  • Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on second life: the case of SecondDMI. Journal of Computer & Education, 52, 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (2004). Virtual realities. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 461–497). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Merchant, G. (2010). 3D virtual worlds as environments for literacy learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 135–150.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2002). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriol, M. D., Tumulty, G., & Snyder, K. (2010). Cognitive apprenticeship as a framework for teaching, online. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 210–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, B., Atkins, C., & Blackall, L. (2008). Engaging with Second Life: Literature Review. http://slenz.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/slliteraturereviewa1.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2010.

  • Schmeil, A., & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Knowledge sharing and collaborative learning in second life: a classification of virtual 3D group interaction scripts. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 15(3), 665–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT. http://GerryStahl.net/mit. Accessed 25 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streefland, L. (1993). Fractions: A realistic approach. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 289–326). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, R., Murty, P., & Twidale, M. (2007). A Second Life for Your Museum: 3D – Multi-User Virtual Environments and Museums. In: Proceedings of Museum and the Web 2007. San Francisco, California.

  • Warburton, S. (2009). Second life in higher education: assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414–426.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Fotini Paraskeva for her valuable contribution when designing and running this research study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hara Bouta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouta, H., Retalis, S. Enhancing primary school children collaborative learning experiences in maths via a 3D virtual environment. Educ Inf Technol 18, 571–596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9198-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9198-8

Keywords

Navigation