Skip to main content
Log in

Using a wiki to facilitate an online professional learning community for induction and mentoring teachers

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this case study was to report on the use of a wiki as a tool for conducting online professional learning communities (OLCs) with 26 induction and mentor teachers. Data sources include teachers’ wiki postings and teacher interviews. Results indicate that: (a) Web 2.0 tools may be most effective in OLCs when the social features are utilized in addition to the features that enable task completion; (b) Using Web 2.0 tools restrictively, and without consideration of their affordances, may inhibit the success of OLCs; (c) Online learning communities for induction teachers may be most effective when supplemented with face-to-face discussion; and (d) A task-driven environment in OLCs can encourage professional dialogue and reflection, but may make induction teachers feel isolated and unsupported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajayi, L. (2009). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning to teach while using asynchronous discussion board. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albion, P. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. (2005). Building and maintaining community in cohort-based online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, G., & Thornton, H. (1999). Telementoring: helping new teachers through the first year. THE Journal, 26(9), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R. (2007). Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C., Hermans, M., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, T., Day, S., & Russo, A. (2002). The virtual conference room: online problem solving for first year special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(4), 352–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. (2008). Teacher learning: reflective practice as a site of engagement for professional identity construction. U.S.-China Education Review, 5(5), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, B. (2002). Learning in the virtual community depends upon changes in local communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 96–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Illingworth, C. (2004). Going remote. Australian Educator, 41(Winter), 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2009). Wikis, digital literacies, and professional growth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), 631–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage.

  • Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 25(18), B26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (2005). Induction into learning communities. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 17, 2010, from www.nctaf.org.

  • Peltier-Davis, C. (2009). Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Library User 2.0, Librarian 2.0: innovative services for sustainable libraries. Computers in Libraries, 29(10-), 16–21. Retrieved from ERIC database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability and supporting sociability. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. (2009). Teachers’ talk in professional development activity that supports change in their ICT pedagogical beliefs and practices. Teacher Development, 13(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samarawickrema, G., Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Different spaces: staff development for Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, P. D., Shea, T. P., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: a catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2005). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W. S., & Hawk, P. P. (1996). PROJECT DIST-ED: teleconferencing as a means of supporting and assisting beginning teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 17(4), 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vratulis, V., & Dobson, T. (2008). Social negotiations in a wiki environment: a case study with pre-service teachers. Educational Media International, 45(4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Hutchison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchison, A., Colwell, J. Using a wiki to facilitate an online professional learning community for induction and mentoring teachers. Educ Inf Technol 17, 273–289 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9159-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9159-7

Keywords

Navigation