Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine how 1:1 laptop initiative affected student learning at a selected rural Midwestern high school. A total of 105 high school students enrolled in 10th–12th grades during the 2008–2009 school year participated in the study. A survey instrument created by the Mitchell Institute was modified and used to collect data on student perceptions and faculty perceptions of the impact of 1:1 laptop computing on student learning and instructional integration of technology in education. Study findings suggest that integration of 1:1 laptop computing positively impacts student academic engagement and student learning. Therefore, there is need for teachers to implement appropriate computing practices to enhance student learning. Additionally, teachers need to collaborate with their students to learn and understand various instructional technology applications beyond basic Internet browsing and word processing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2009). Berkshire wireless learning initiative: Final evaluation report. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/researchprojects/ bwli/pdf/BWLI_Final_Report.pdf.
Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Special edition: Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1). Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://escholarship.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1236&context=jtla.
Devaney, L. (2009). Study: Ed tech leads to significant gains. Benton Foundation. eSchool News. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/04/22/study-ed-tech-leads-to-significant-gains/.
Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. F. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student laptop ratio bring to technology supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 440–452.
Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2008). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Keengwe, J. (2007). Faculty integration of technology into instruction and students’ perceptions of computer technology to improve student learning. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 169–180.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565.
Keengwe, J., Kidd, T. T., & Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009a). Faculty and technology: implications for faculty training and technology leadership. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 23–28.
Keengwe, J., Pearson, D., & Smart, K. (2009b). Technology integration: mobile devices (iPods), constructivist pedagogy, and student learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal (AACEJ), 17(4), 333–346.
Kvavik, R. B., & Caruso, J. B. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: convenience, connection, control, and learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR) publication, 6.
Poole, B. J. (2009). Ten pillars of successful technology implementation—education for an information age: Teaching in a computerized education world. Retrieved October 5, 2010, from http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/columnists/poole/poole011.shtml.
Schoepp, K. (2005). Barriers to technology integration in a technology rich environment: Learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved August 12, 2010 from http://www.zu.ac.ae/lthe.
Shapely, K., Sheenan, D., Sturges, K., Caranikas-Walker, F., Huntsberger, B., & Maloney, C. (2009). Evaluation of the Texas technology immersion pilot: Final outcomes for a four-year study (2004–05 to 2007–08). Austin: Texas Center for Educational Research.
Solvie, P., & Kloek, M. (2007). Using technology tools to engage students with multiple learning styles in a constructivist learning environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 7–27.
Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(5), 5–45.
Wachira, P., Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2008). Mathematics preservice teachers’ beliefs and conceptions of appropriate technology use. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 16(3), 293–306.
Warschauer, W. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.
Winking, D. (2009). Preparing every child for the challenges of changing world: Strategies. Secaucus: Panasonic Foundation.
Zucker, A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323(5910), 82–85. Retrieved October 27, 2010, from http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/323/5910/82.
Zucker, A., & McGhee, R. (Eds.). (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico county public schools. SRI International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G. & Mills, C. Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Educ Inf Technol 17, 137–146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8