Abstract
Our research is concerned with the visual representations found in textbooks used for the teaching of the Internet in Greek secondary schools. Visualization, as both the product and the process of creation, interpretation and reflection upon pictures and images, is considered here to be very important, as it is the only way students gain insight into the nature and function of the Internet, its size, complexity and invisibility. Initially, we attempted to analyze and reflect upon school textbooks’ visual interpretations of the Internet. A scheme of categories of visual representations has been identified and reveals the characteristics of the textbooks’ representations as well as their limitations. Sketch-comics and computer snap-shots are the more popular types of Vrep, although a considerable number of them cannot be characterized as accurate and few of them have an explanatory or complementary function in terms of the content presented in the text. We have also explored the impact on students’ readings of two visual representations in one of the textbooks, used without any caption or textual information. The phenomenological aspects of the VRep seem to attract students’ attention and create obstacles in conceptualizing the main idea conveyed in both representations, but when the field of ICT is implied and not clearly portrayed in the VRep, students face serious problems in recognizing the phenomenon. It seems that it is difficult for an image on its own to paint a thousand words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AAAS—Project (2006). Identifying Curriculum Materials for Science Literacy: Project, A. 2061 Evaluation Tool. Available online: http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/roseman/roseman2.htm, [retrieved on October 31, 2006]
Arapoglou, A., Mavoglou, C., Ikonomakos, I., & Fytros, K. (2006). Informatics for gymnasium. Athens: O.E.D.B.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215–241. doi:10.1023/A:1024312321077.
Bell, A., & Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 34–42.
Bishop, A. (1989). Review of research on visualization on mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 7–16.
Bliss, J., Monk, M., & Ogborn, J. (1983). Qualitative data analysis for educational research. London: Croom Helm.
Carvalho, P. S., & Sousa, A. S. (2006). Should we use colours as symbolic representations of hot and cold? Physics Education, 41(3), 263–266. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/41/3/010.
Cheng, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Towards a better utilization of diagrams in science education research. In: CD-ROM ESERA 2007, Full length papers, International Conference in Malmö, European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). Malmö, Sweden.
Claffy, K., Monk, T. E., & McRobb, D. (1999). Internet tomography. Nature: web matters. Available online: http://nature.com/nature/webmatters/tomog/tomog.html, [retrieved on May 22, 2007].
Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: the influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90, 1073–1091. doi:10.1002/sce.20164.
Crisp, V., & Sweiry, E. (2006). Can a picture ruin a thousand words? The effects of visual resources in exam questions. Educational Research, 48(2), 139–154. doi:10.1080/00131880600732249.
Damianakis, A., Tzavaras, A., Mavoglou, C., & Dadouris, K. (2006). Informatics for gymnasium. Athens: O.E.D.B.
Dodge, M. (2001). Imagining the Inner Workings of the Internet. Mappa.Mundi Magazine. Available online: htpp://mappa.mundi.net/maps_024/imageq.html, [retrieved on October 1, 2007].
Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, J. M., & Wolak, J. (2003). Escaping or connecting? characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 105–119. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00114-8.
Furió-Mαs, C., Luisa Catalayud, M., Guisasoia, J., & Furió-Gomez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and the theories of acid-base reactions presented? chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1337–1358.
Gast, J., & Barford, P. (2004). Representing the internet as a succinct forest. Computer Networks, 44(1), 35–44.
Giakoumakis, E., Gyrtis, K., Belesiotis, V. S., Xynos, P., & Stergiopoulou-Kalantzi, N. (2005). Applications of informatics and computers. Athens: O.E.D.B.
Good, R. (1993). Editorial: science textbook analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 619.
Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
King, A. B. (2006). Mapping the Unmappable: Visual representations of the Internet as Social Constructions. Center for Social Informatics Working Paper, Indiana University. Available online: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/wp00-05B.html [retrieved on December 1, 2006].
Kollara, M., Kanellopoulos, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (2000). Students’ mental models and computer networks: The case of electronic mail. In: CD-Rom Proceedings of the Pan-Hellenic Conference: ICT in Education. Patras: University of Patras (In Greek).
Koulaidis, V., & Dimopoulos, K. (2005). The co-deployment of visual representations and written language as resources for meaning making in greek primary school science textbooks. International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 243–254.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176.
Makrakis, V. (1988). Computers in school education—The cases of Sweden and Greece. Institute of International Education, University of Stockholm.
Mavers, D., Somekh, B., & Restorick, J. (2002). Interpreting the externalised images of pupils’ conceptions of ICT: methods for the analysis of concept maps. Computers & Education, 38(1–3), 187–207.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–727.
Mayring, P. (2000, June). Qualitative Content Analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 1(2). Available online: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm [retrieved on December 11, 2006].
McCormick, B. H., DeFantim, T. A., & Brown, M. D. (1987). Visualization in scientific computing: definition, domain, and recommendations. Computer Graphics, 21, 3–13.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Panagiotakopoulos, C. (1998). Computer and educational software. In A. Kokkos, A. Lionarakis, H. Matralis, & C. Panagiotakopoulos (Eds.), Open and distance learning—educational material and new technologies (pp. 187–326). Patras: Hellenic Open University Publications.
Papastergiou, M. (2005). Students’ mental models of the internet and their didactical exploitation in informatics education. Education and Information Technologies, 10(4), 341–360.
Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Prevalence, function and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1089–1114.
Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. (2004). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89(2), 219–241.
Rogers, L., & Finlayson, H. (2004). Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: how are science teachers meeting the challenge? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 287–306.
Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 977–1019.
Schnotz, W., Picard, E., & Hron, A. (1993). How do successful and unsuccessful learners use texts and graphics? Learning and Instruction, 3, 181–199.
Spiliotopoulou, V., & Karatrantou, A. (2005). Students’ ideas of webpage and teaching implications. Educational Review, 39, 133–151 (In Greek).
Stern, E., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.
Sun, P. C., & Cheng, H. K. (2007). The design of instructional multimedia in e-learning: a media richness theory-based approach. Computers & Education, 49(3), 662–676.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.
Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Genetics reasoning with multiple external representations. Research in Science Education, 33, 111–135.
Webb, M. E. (2002). Pedagogical reasoning: issues and solutions for the teaching and learning of ICT in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 7(3), 237–255.
Winn, W. D. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211–247.
Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.
Yan, Z. (2006). What influences children’s and adolescents’ understanding of the complexity of the internet? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 418–428.
Yegenoglou, F., Faris, F., & Qadan, Q. (2000). A model for representing wide area Internet packet behavior. Paper appeared in Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, IPCC. Conference Proceedings of the IEEE International, 167–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spiliotopoulou-Papantoniou, V., Karatrantou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C. et al. Visual representations of the internet in greek school textbooks and students’ experiences. Educ Inf Technol 14, 205–227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9081-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9081-9