Skip to main content
Log in

Learning by doing—The influence of students’ experience in community television production on personality variables

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of students’ experience in community television production, i.e. “learning by doing”, on their self-image. The research population included 157 subjects who underwent a set of tests for evaluating their self-image (personal, moral and social) and motivation. All the subjects took part in the production of a film and experienced the production roles according to their personal choice (director, editor, photographer, actor). At the end of the learning process and the production of the film the subjects took the same set of tests again in order to determine the change that took place following the process. Sixty-one subjects also participated in an interview that examined their attitudes and feelings towards the process they had undergone. The results indicate that students who experienced learning via community television production roles improved their personal, moral, social and self-image. An open experience system can thus create a common framework in which each person contributes towards a completed product, and can help develop the student’s self-image and motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, A. (1957). The progress of mankind. Journal of Individual Psychology, 13, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and students’ motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 users’ guide. USA: Smallwaters Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle, J. (1987). 9 to 19: Crucial years for self-esteem in children and youth. Seattle: Special Child.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report no. 1. Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (1996). Handbook of self concept, developmental social and clinical consideration. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. G. (1997). Strategies of educational research qualitative methods. London: Palmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical analysis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooly, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearn, J. (1995). Promoting active learning in introductory science courses. Science News, 1. In: http://science.uniserve.edu.au/newsletter/vol1/dearn.html.

  • Diggory, J. C. (1966). Self evaluation: Concepts and studies. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, R. (1995). Individual differences in young people’s self concepts: Implications for children with cleft lip and palate. In R. Eder (Ed.) Developmental perspectives on craniofacial problems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeland, B., Kalkoske, M., Gottesman, N., & Erickson, M. (1990). Preschool behavior problems: Stability and factors accounting for change. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 891–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., & MacDougall, M. (1996). Students’ responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 719–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, W. H. (1965). Manual for the Tennessee self concept scale. Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tests.

  • Fitts, W. H. (1971). The self concept and psychopathology. Monograph 4, Nashville.

  • Francis, E. A. (1996). Self concepts of children with visual impairments. RE: View, 28, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. H. Zimmerman (Eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performances: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127–253). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, L. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in education research. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, P., & Durlak, J. A. (1998). Changing self-esteem in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27(4), 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1990). Self and identity development. In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.) At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352–387). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.): Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Rose, D., & Winne, P. H. (1993). Measuring component and sets of cognitive processes in self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1980). Stages of moral development as basis for moral education. In B. Munsey (Ed.) Moral development, moral education, and Kohlberg. Birmingham: Religious Education.

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthey, S. J. (1994). Authors, text and talk: The internalization of dialogue from social interaction during writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(3), 201–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. (1997). Instructional strategies that teach. CBT Solutions Nov./Dec., 1–11.

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, C., & Zucchermaglio, C. (1990). A passage to literacy: Learning in a social context. In Y. Goodman (Ed.) How children construct literacy. New York: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students, approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1965). A humanistic conception of man. In R. E. Farson (Ed.) Science and human affairs. California: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., McDowell, L. & Brown, S. (1997). But is it fair? An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. E., & Stronkhorst, L. H. (1984). Introduction to causal modeling in non-experimental research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3,4), 201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation of ideologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven & D. L. Stuffelebeam (Eds.) Evaluation models. Boston: Klumer Jijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnogrpahic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Steinaker, N. W., & Bell, M. R. (1979). The experiential taxonomy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, D. W. (1984). Self-esteem and adjusting with blindness: The process of responding to life’s demands. Springfield: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, S. (1996). Effects of multigrade and multi-age classes reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, G. (1998). Some questions about direct instruction: Why: To whom? How? And when? Language Art, 76(1), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baruch Offir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Offir, B., Aflalo, M. Learning by doing—The influence of students’ experience in community television production on personality variables. Educ Inf Technol 13, 3–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9050-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9050-8

Keywords

Navigation