Skip to main content
Log in

On-line learning networks: Framework and scenarios

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea of using the internet as a platform to mediate social interactions and learning at different levels has progressively affirming itself, and this has given rise to a huge number of spontaneous and planned collectives, which are often described as on-line learning networks. On-line learning networks create value through the combination of content and people’s knowledge. They can vary widely in the strength and permanence of their connections and the resources necessary to maintain them. Aspects of both a pragmatic and social nature need to be carefully considered in the process of initiation of on-line learning communities. This paper considers learning networks from the perspective of the potential they offer to the strengthening of relationships among institutions, groups, and people sharing a common interest in computer-enhanced learning. Some case studies are analysed and an analytical framework is sketched out to guide observations and to provide a lens through which case studies can be interpreted. The final goal is to delineate a reference for identifying strong and weak elements in virtual networks and to examine under what conditions they are succeeding. In addition, some possible scenarios for on-line networks are delineated along two main lines: the organisation and structure of the network and its level of establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The author of this article was elected member of the Prometeus Steering Committee from its establishment and chair from March 2001 to March 2002.

  2. See http://cordis.europa.eu/instr_noe.htm (accessed July 2006).

  3. http://www.noe-kaleidoscope.org/ (accessed June 2006).

  4. The author of this article is currently participating to this Network of Excellence as a member of Kaleidoscope Core Group and Executive Group and as chair of TELMA (Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics) one of the European Research Teams of Kaleidoscope: http://www.itd.cnr.it/telma/ (accessed June 2006).

  5. U-Learn is a project funded by EC through the “e-learning” program: http://ulearn.itd.ge.cnr.it/info.htm (accessed June 2006).

  6. See http://www.scuolan.it/mailman/listinfo/cabrinews (accessed June 2006).

  7. See: http://www.cabri.com/v2/pages/en/index.php (accessed July 2006).

References

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported teacher professional development community. Information Society, 19, 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottino, R. M. (2003). ICT, National polices, and their impact on schools and teachers’ development. In C. Dowling & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Information and communication technology and the teacher of the future (pp. 41–47). Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Report (2001). Open consultation: New research challenges for technology supported learning, available at: http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/telearn/consultation.htm (accessed July 2006).

  • EC Report 2005 Review and update of the IST work programme for the period 2005–06, available at: http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/telearn/goals.htm (accessed July 2006).

  • Griffiths, D., Hummel, H., Kearney, N., & Liber, O. (2001). Learning communities–pedagogical considerations and uptake issues, Prometeus Pedagogies Group Expert Meeting, Majorca, available at: http://www.iua.upf.es/~dgriffit/ (accessed June 2006).

  • Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asyncronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993) What is usability? usability engineering (p23–48). New Jersey: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: Methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Volume II) A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633–652). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. London: Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Maria Bottino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bottino, R.M. On-line learning networks: Framework and scenarios. Educ Inf Technol 12, 93–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9030-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9030-z

Keywords

Navigation