Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new direction?

Digital literacy, student participation and curriculum reform in Norway

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital literacy is now defined as a key area of competence in the new national curriculum for schools in Norway. For policy makers the terms ‘information society’ and ‘knowledge society’ has been used to argue for implementing new technologies in education, and for improving learning. These views have been highly problematic, partly because they do not take into consideration how new technologies are used by young people, or how schools work as social practices. This article will focus on how we conceptualize a student perspective in schools related to the use of digital technologies. Combining an increased focus on digital literacy in school curricula with an increased focus on student participation challenges our conception of the school-aged learner. In discussing these issues I will draw on results from a number of school-based ICT projects that I have been involved in since 1998.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton, D. (1994). Literacy. An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the classroom. Education for a changing world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education. Learning, literacy and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Keyssar, H. (1985). ‘The concept of literacy in print and film’. In Olson, Torrance & Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning. The nature and consequences of reading and writing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies. Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (2001). Medier for fremtiden. Børn, unge og det nye medielandskab. (Media for the future. Children, youth and the new media landscape) København: Høst & Søn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O. (2004). PILOTer for skoleutvikling (PILOTs for school development). UniPub. Report no. 28. ITU, University of Oslo.

  • Erstad, O. (2005). Digital kompetanse i skolen (Digital literacy in the school). Oslo: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., Frølich, T. H., Kløvstad, V., & Vestby, G. M. (2000). Den langsomme eksplosjonen (The slow explosion). UniPub. Report no. 11. ITU, University of Oslo.

  • Erstad, O., Kløvstad, V., Kristiansen, T. & Søby, M. (2005). ITU Monitor 2005—På vei mot digital kompetanse i grunnopplæringen. (ITU Monitor 2005—On the way towards digital literacy in basic education.) Oslo: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H. (1979). The literacy myth: Literacy and social structure in the nineteenth-century. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.) (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum

  • Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology, innovation and educational change. Eugene, Oregon: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubey, R. (Ed.) (1997). Media literacy in the information age. New Brunswick: Transaction.

  • Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). ‘Student-centered learning environments’. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.) Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterud, S. (2004). Utdanning for informasjonssamfunnet. Den tredje vei. (Education for the information society. The third way.) Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, L. (2001). Det lærende samfund. Hyperkompleksitet og viden. (The learning society. Hypercomplexity and knowledge.) København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Et sociokulturellt perspektiv.(Learning in practice. A sociocultural perspective) Stockholm: Prisma förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (Ed.) (2002). Silicon literacies. Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. London: Routledge.

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world. Teaching and learning in the age of information. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies. Language, culture and power in online education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (Eds.) (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

  • Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2004). Culture for learning. White paper no. 30 (2003–2004). Oslo: Ministry of Education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ola Erstad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erstad, O. A new direction?. Educ Inf Technol 11, 415–429 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9008-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9008-2

Keywords

Navigation