Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gastrointestinal perforation following dabrafenib and trametinib administration in non-small cell lung carcinoma with BRAF V600E mutation: a case report and literature review

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Gastrointestinal perforation related to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors has been reported previously; however, there has been no case report of such a condition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we report a case of small intestinal perforation secondary to dabrafenib and trametinib administration, but not related to tumor regression. A 62-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer harboring BRAF V600E mutation was treated with dabrafenib and trametinib. Four months after the initiation of treatment, a small intestinal perforation was diagnosed. Dabrafenib and trametinib rechallenge was performed after gastrointestinal perforation. The patient responded well to therapy and did not experience recurrence of gastrointestinal perforation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of gastrointestinal perforation in a patient with NSCLC treated with a MEK inhibitor. The mechanism and risk factors of trametinib-induced perforation are currently unknown. Physicians should be aware of such severe gastrointestinal side effects of trametinib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All related datas are presented in this paper, further inofrmation or datas are available on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BRAF:

V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1

MEK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

CT:

Computed tomography

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PR:

Partial response

References

  1. Cardarella S, Ogino A, Nishino M et al (2013) Clinical, pathologic, and biologic features associated with BRAF mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19:4532–4540. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pratilas CA, Hanrahan AJ, Halilovic E et al (2008) Genetic predictors of MEK dependence in non–small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 68:9375–9383. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Solit DB, Garraway LA, Pratilas CA et al (2006) BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition. Nature 439:358–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJ et al (2016) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:984–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30146-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Planchard D, Smit EF, Groen HJ et al (2017) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30679-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalemkerian GP, Narula N, Kennedy EB et al (2018) Molecular testing guideline for the selection of patients with lung cancer for treatment with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 36:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.7293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettinger DS, Wood DE et al (2020) NCCN Guidelines Version 1. 2021 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf. Accessed 25 November 2020. National Comprehensive Cancer Network

  8. Mourad N, Lourenço N, Delyon J et al (2019) Severe gastrointestinal toxicity of MEK inhibitors. Melanoma Res 29:556–559. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kass SL, Linden AF, Jackson PG, De Brito PA, Atkins MB (2015) Bowel perforation associated with robust response to BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for BRAF-mutant melanoma: a case report. Melanoma Manag 2:115–120. https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt.15.10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ascierto PA, Schadendorf D, Berking C et al (2013) MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70024-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uppaluri R, Winkler AE, Lin T et al (2017) Biomarker and tumor responses of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma to trametinib: a phase II neoadjuvant window-of-opportunity clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res 23:2186–2194. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J et al (2016) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 11:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. (2017) https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf Accessed 27 November 2017. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Keiko Sakuragawa and Kanako Masuta for their administrative assistance, and Motoko Mizumoto for operation of the case.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yuri Shimada, Yuki Sato, Ryo Tachikawa and Shigeo Hara. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yuri Shimada and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuki Sato.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

Dr. Sato and Dr. Tomii have received lecture fees from Novartis Pharma K.K. (Tokyo, Japan). All remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. We wish to confirm that there are no other known conflicts of interest associated with this publication. Further, there was no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimada, Y., Sato, Y., Tachikawa, R. et al. Gastrointestinal perforation following dabrafenib and trametinib administration in non-small cell lung carcinoma with BRAF V600E mutation: a case report and literature review. Invest New Drugs 39, 1702–1706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-021-01135-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-021-01135-0

Keywords

Navigation