Skip to main content
Log in

The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States

  • Phase III Studies
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The approval of orphan anticancer drugs in Japan has increased to meet high social demand. Drug lag, namely the approval lag of new drugs, is recognized as a social issue in Japan. We investigated the approval lag and its components, submission lag and review-time lag, between Japan and the United States (US) to reveal whether an approval lag still exists, and to identify potential factors that may contribute to reducing the approval lag. Anticancer drugs approved in Japan between April 2004 and November 2017 were investigated using publicly available information. Results showed that the median approval lag of orphan anticancer drugs in 2016–2017 was 727.0 days (interquartile range, IQR, 310.0–1054.3). The approval lag was significantly correlated with the submission lag (correlation coefficient = 1.00, P < 0.001) but not with the review-time lag (correlation coefficient = −0.16, P = 0.22). The submission lag was significantly longer for orphan anticancer drugs than non-orphan drugs (median, 712.5 days [IQR, 186.0–1448.3] vs. 387.0 days [92.8–1096.0], P = 0.023). External collaboration in drug development was associated with a longer submission lag (coefficient = 762.1, P = 0.017), while breakthrough therapy designation in the US was associated with a shorter submission lag (coefficient = −832.8, P = 0.035). In conclusion, we revealed that an approval lag for orphan anticancer drugs still existed in 2016–2017. A submission lag for orphan anticancer drugs was the main component affecting the approval lag, and was longer than that for non-orphan drugs. External collaboration in drug development may be a potential factor in reducing the submission lag for orphan anticancer drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blay JY, Coindre JM, Ducimetiere F, Ray-Coquard I (2016) The value of research collaborations and consortia in rare cancers. Lancet Oncol 17(2):e62–e69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00388-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, Otter R, Licitra L, Mallone S, Tavilla A, Trama A, Capocaccia R (2011) Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer 47(17):2493–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heemstra HE, van Weely S, Buller HA, Leufkens HG, de Vrueh RL (2009) Translation of rare disease research into orphan drug development: disease matters. Drug Discov Today 14(23–24):1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2009.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015) Overview of orphan drug/medical device designation system. (in Japanese) http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000068484.html Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  5. Maeda K, Kaneko M, Narukawa M, Arato T (2017) Points to consider: efficacy and safety evaluations in the clinical development of ultra-orphan drugs. Orphanet J Rare Dis 12(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0690-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ueno T, Asahina Y, Tanaka A, Yamada H, Nakamura M, Uyama Y (2014) Significant differences in drug lag in clinical development among various strategies used for regulatory submissions in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95(5):533–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2013.223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yonemori K, Hirakawa A, Ando M, Hirata T, Yunokawa M, Shimizu C, Katsumata N, Tamura K, Fujiwara Y (2011) The notorious "drug lag" for oncology drugs in Japan. Investig New Drugs 29(4):706–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9638-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawabata-Shoda E, Masuda S, Kimura H (2012) Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan. J Clin Pharm Ther 37(5):547–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01332.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2015) Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan? Int J Clin Oncol 20(6):1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakayama H, Tsukamoto K (2018) Unique characteristics of regulatory approval and pivotal studies of orphan anticancer drugs in Japan. Investig New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0603-z

  11. Tsuji K, Tsutani K (2010) Approval of new drugs 1999-2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations. J Clin Pharm Ther 35(3):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01099.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirai Y, Kinoshita H, Kusama M, Yasuda K, Sugiyama Y, Ono S (2010) Delays in new drug applications in Japan and industrial R&D strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(2):212–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2009.215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito Y, Narimatsu H, Fukui T, Fukao A, Yoshioka T (2013) Critical review of 'Public domain application': a flexible drug approval system in Japan. Ann Oncol 24(5):1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda H, Kurokawa T (2014) Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecularly targeted oncology drug between Japan and Western countries. Investig New Drugs 32(4):661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0080-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2014) Guidance for industry expedited programs for serious conditions – drugs and biologics. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM358301.pdf Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  17. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015) On the revision of the standard review timeline for new drug applications. (in Japanese) https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000159256.pdf. Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  18. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (2017) Review report for pralatrexate. (in Japanese) http://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2017/P20170605001/770098000_22900AMX00585_A100_1.pdf Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  19. Mundipharma K.K. (2017) Common technical document for pralatrexate. (in Japanese) www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2017/P20170605001/index.html Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009) Approval letter for pralatrexate. https://www.accessdatafdagov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2009/022468s000ltr.pdf Accessed 06 Feb 2018

  21. Jones A (2007) Minimizing leakage of value from R&D alliances. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6(9):711–719. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka M, Matsumaru N, Tsukamoto K (2018) Influence of expedited programs in the United States on oncology drug development in Japan. Ther Innov Regul Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479018769288

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Katsuya Nakano for his review of the study from a regulatory affairs viewpoint and to Makoto Tanaka for his useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Nakayama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Hiroki Nakayama is an employee of Astellas Pharma Inc. Naoki Matsumaru declares that he has no conflict of interest. Katsura Tsukamoto declares that he has no conflict of interest. The Global Regulatory Science laboratory is financially maintained by donations from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

(PDF 146 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakayama, H., Matsumaru, N. & Tsukamoto, K. The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States. Invest New Drugs 37, 1086–1093 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0612-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0612-y

Keywords

Navigation