Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment-related serious adverse events and fatal adverse events with regorafenib in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Regorafenib (Stivarga) is an oral small-molecule multikinase inhibitor commonly used against a variety of cancers. We performed a meta-analysis of all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of regorafenib to quantify the increased risk of SAEs and FAEs. We carried out a systematic search of electronic databases for studies published from inception to February 2017 without any restrictions. Eligibility criteria included phase 3 RCTs of tumors comparing regorafenib, alone or in combination with non-targeted chemotherapy (regorafenib arm) versus placebo or non-targeted chemotherapy (control arm). Data on SAEs and FAEs were extracted from each study and pooled to determine the overall incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of four phase 3 RCTs involving 1736 cancer patients met the eligibility criteria and were included. The overall incidence of SAEs and FAEs with regorafenib were 0.23 (95%CI, 0.05–0.40) and 0.02 (95%CI, 0.01–0.03), respectively. Compared with control, the summary RR of developing a regorafenib-related SAE was 1.60 (95%CI, 0.95–2.68, P=0.07), the summary RR of developing a regorafenib-related FAE was 1.71 (95%CI, 0.69–4.24, P=0.25). No evidence was found for the association between regorafenib and higher risk of SAEs and FAEs. This association varied significantly with cancer types (P=0.02) for SAEs but no evidence of heterogeneity was found for FAEs. This meta-analysis demonstrates no evidence for the association between regorafenib and higher risk of SAEs and FAEs. This analysis will be important when considering the trade-off of regorafenib treatment during clinical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saravanan K, Krishnamoorthy VR, Sebastian S et al (2015) Management of regorafenib-related toxicities: a review. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 8(5):285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Festino L, Fabozzi A, Manzo A et al (2013) Critical appraisal of the use of regorafenib in the management of colorectal cancer. Cancer Management and Research 5:49–55

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. De Wit M, Boers-Doets CB, Saettini A et al (2014) Prevention and management of adverse events related to regorafenib. Support Care Cancer 22:837–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. George D, Demetri PR, Kang Y-K et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: an international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, placebocontrolled phase 3 trial (GRID). Lancet 381(9863):295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Qin S, Xu R et al (2015) Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:619–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P et al (2017) Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:56–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yue-hong C, Liang D, Xing-yuan G et al (2014) Implement meta-analysis with non-comparative binary data in RevMan software. Chin J Evid-based Med 14(7):889–896

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dominic James, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

The project is sponsored by the scientific research foundation for the introduction of talents, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute. Educational Commission of Liaoning Province of China (No. 20060973), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Liaoning Province of China (No. 2007225009-1, 2011404013-9, 2011225019, 2013225079), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81372532), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenyang (No. F15-139-9-27).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingdong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Meihui Cao declares that she has no conflict of interest. Feifei Li declares that she has no conflict of interest. Yue Wang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jingdong Zhang declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, M., Li, F., Wang, Y. et al. Treatment-related serious adverse events and fatal adverse events with regorafenib in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Invest New Drugs 35, 834–838 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0512-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0512-6

Keywords

Navigation