A phase II study evaluating axitinib in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer Paul L. Swiecicki Email author Lili Zhao Emily Belile Assuntina G. Sacco Douglas B. Chepeha Irina Dobrosotskaya Matthew Spector Andrew Shuman Kelly Malloy Jeffrey Moyer Erin McKean Scott McLean Gregory T. Wolf Avraham Eisbruch Mark Prince Carol Bradford Thomas Carey Francis P. Worden PHASE II STUDIES First Online: 10 October 2015 Received: 28 July 2015 Accepted: 02 October 2015
2
Citations
267
Downloads
Abstract Background Axitinib is an oral, potent, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with selective inhibition of VEGFR 1,2, 3, as well as inhibition of potential downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway. Given the upregulation of EGFR and VEGFR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with axitinib holds promise as a rational targeted therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were included in this open label, single arm, phase II trial. Primary endpoint was 6 month progression free survival. All patients received single agent axitinib with planned dose escalation based on tolerability. A planned interim efficacy analysis was performed after enrollment of 30 patients. Results Forty-two patients were registered, 30 were evaluable. While treatment was well-tolerated with no severe bleeding events, only 19 patients were able to achieve full planned dose. The best overall response rate was 6.7 % (two partial responses) with a disease control rate of 76.7 %. Median progression free survival was 3.7 months (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 3.5–5.7) and overall survival was 10.9 months (95 % CI: 6.4–17.8). Exploratory analysis demonstrated that patients with a smaller sum of diameter of target lesions experienced improved response rates, and better progression-free and overall survival. Conclusion Treatment with single agent axitinib should be considered due to acceptable toxicity profile and favorable median overall survival compared to standard therapies.
Keywords Head and neck cancer Squamous cell carcinoma Axitinib Tyrosine kinase inhibitor Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
References 1.
Hutson TE, Lesovoy V, Al-Shukri S, et al (2013) Axitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1287–1294
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 2.
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al (2013) Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:552–562
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 3.
Locati LD, Licitra L, Agate L, et al (2014) Treatment of advanced thyroid cancer with axitinib: phase 2 study with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and quality-of-life assessments. Cancer 120:2694–2703
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 4.
Cohen EE, Tortorici M, Kim S, et al (2014) A phase II trial of axitinib in patients with various histologic subtypes of advanced thyroid cancer: long-term outcomes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74:1261–1270
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 5.
Hu-Lowe DD, Zou HY, Grazzini ML, et al (2008) Nonclinical antiangiogenesis and antitumor activities of axitinib (AG-013736), an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases 1, 2, 3. Clin Cancer Res 14:7272–7283
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 6.
Schiller JH, Larson T, Ou SH, et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of axitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 27:3836–3841
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 7.
Furnival GM, Wilson RW (1974) Regressions by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 16:499–511
CrossRef Google Scholar 8.
Cohen EE, Kane MA, List MA, et al (2005) Phase II trial of gefitinib 250 mg daily in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 11:8418–8424
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 9.
Cohen MH, Williams GA, Sridhara R, et al (2003) FDA drug approval summary: gefitinib (ZD1839) (iressa) tablets. Oncologist 8:303–306
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 10.
Stewart JS, Cohen EE, Licitra L, et al (2009) Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected]. J Clin Oncol 27:1864–1871
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 11.
Soulieres D, Senzer NN, Vokes EE, et al (2004) Multicenter phase II study of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 22:77–85
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 12.
Williamson SK, Moon J, Huang CH, et al (2010) Phase II evaluation of sorafenib in advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: southwest oncology group study S0420. J Clin Oncol 28:3330–3335
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 13.
Gilbert J, Schell MJ, Zhao X, et al (2015) A randomized phase II efficacy and correlative studies of cetuximab with or without sorafenib in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 51:376–382
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 14.
Kim HS, Kwon HJ, Jung I, et al (2015) Phase II clinical and exploratory biomarker study of dacomitinib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 21:544–552
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 15.
Bechtold RE, Chen MY, Stanton CA, et al (2003) Cystic changes in hepatic and peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with gleevec. Abdom Imaging 28:808–814
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 16.
Linton KM, Taylor MB, Radford JA (2006) Response evaluation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib: misdiagnosis of disease progression on CT due to cystic change in liver metastases. Br J Radiol 79:e40–e44
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 17.
Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA, et al (2007) We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. J Clin Oncol 25:1760–1764
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 18.
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, et al (2007) Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol 25:1753–1759
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 19.
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 20.
Goh V, Ganeshan B, Nathan P, et al (2011) Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. Radiology 261:165–171
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 21.
Kambadakone A, Yoon SS, Kim TM, et al (2015) CT perfusion as an imaging biomarker in monitoring response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab and radiation in soft-tissue sarcomas: comparison with tumor morphology, circulating and tumor biomarkers, and gene expression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W11–W18
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 22.
Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, et al (2008) Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:261–269
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 23.
Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29:4294–4301
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 24.
Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al (2010) Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 363:24–35
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 25.
Huang H, Zhang B, Chen W, et al (2012) Human papillomavirus infection and prognostic predictors in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:891–896
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 26.
Waugh DJ, Wilson C (2008) The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:6735–6741
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 27.
Petreaca ML, Yao M, Liu Y, et al (2007) Transactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 by interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) is required for IL-8/CXCL8-induced endothelial permeability. Mol Biol Cell 18:5014–5023
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 28.
Gyanchandani R, Sano D, Ortega Alves MV, et al (2013) Interleukin-8 as a modulator of response to bevacizumab in preclinical models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 49:761–770
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 29.
Le QT, Fisher R, Oliner KS, et al (2012) Prognostic and predictive significance of plasma HGF and IL-8 in a phase III trial of chemoradiation with or without tirapazamine in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18:1798–1807
PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 30.
Rischin D, Peters LJ, O'Sullivan B, et al (2010) Tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiation versus cisplatin and radiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (TROG 02.02, HeadSTART): a phase III trial of the trans-Tasman radiation oncology group. J Clin Oncol 28:2989–2995
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Authors and Affiliations Paul L. Swiecicki Email author Lili Zhao Emily Belile Assuntina G. Sacco Douglas B. Chepeha Irina Dobrosotskaya Matthew Spector Andrew Shuman Kelly Malloy Jeffrey Moyer Erin McKean Scott McLean Gregory T. Wolf Avraham Eisbruch Mark Prince Carol Bradford Thomas Carey Francis P. Worden 1. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Ann Arbor USA 2. University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center La Jolla USA 3. Department of Oncology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit USA