Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Target-specific randomized discontinuation trial design: a novel approach in molecular therapeutics

  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose: To describe a phase II study design to evaluate the activity of novel anti-cancer agents that focuses on molecular pathogenesis rather than tumor histology. Methods: We propose an enrichment design that enrolls patients across histologies expressing target X and incorporates randomized discontinuation of drug Y after an initial treatment period to evaluate for potential cystostatic activity. Results: We are currently evaluating the activity of lapatinib in patients with HER-2 amplified solid tumors using the target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design. Patients receive treatment with lapatinib for an initial 12-week period. After restaging, patients with disease progression are removed from study, patients achieving an objective response continue treatment, and patients with stable disease are randomized to continue lapatinib versus initiate treatment with placebo. The primary endpoints are to evaluate the objective response rate during the initial treatment period and to evaluate the proportion of patients progression-free 12 weeks post-randomization. Conclusion: The target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design is an attractive alternative to the traditional phase II design for the development of “targeted” therapeutics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Millar AW, Lynch KP (2003) Rethinking clinical trials for cytostatic drugs. Nat Rev 3:540–545

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D et al (1999) Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 17:2639–2648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosner GL, Stadler W, Ratain MJ (2002) Randomized discontinuation design: application to cytostatic antineoplastic agents. J Clin Oncol 20:4478–4484. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.11.126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa060655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2006) Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:2505–2512. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardwick RH, Shepherd NA, Moorghen M, Newcomb PV, Alderson D (1995) c-erbB-2 overexpression in the dysplasia/carcinoma sequence of Barrett’s oesophagus. J Clin Pathol 48:129–132. doi:10.1136/jcp.48.2.129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hetzel DJ, Wilson TO, Keeney GL, Roche PC, Cha SS, Podratz KC (1992) HER-2/neu expression: a major prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 47:179–185. doi:10.1016/0090-8258(92)90103-P

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyamoto H, Kubota Y, Noguchi S et al (2000) C-ERBB-2 gene amplification as a prognostic marker in human bladder cancer. Urology 55:679–683. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00604-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park DI, Yun JW, Park JH et al (2006) HER-2/neu amplification is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci 51:1371–1379. doi:10.1007/s10620-005-9057-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lara PN Jr, Meyers FJ, Gray CR et al (2002) HER-2/neu is overexpressed infrequently in patients with prostate carcinoma. Results from the California Cancer Consortium Screening Trial. Cancer 94:2584–2589. doi:10.1002/cncr.10526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baselga J, Rosen N (2008) Determinants of RASistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. J Clin Oncol 26:1582–1584. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galsky MD, Mironov S, Iasonos A, Scattergood J, Boyle MG, Bajorin DF (2007) Phase II trial of pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 25:265–270. doi:10.1007/s10637-006-9020-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon MS, Matei D, Aghajanian C et al (2006) Clinical activity of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4), a HER dimerization inhibitor, in advanced ovarian cancer: potential predictive relationship with tumor HER2 activation status. J Clin Oncol 24:4324–4332. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulke MH, Muzikansky A, Clark J et al (2006) A Phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Invest 24:346–350. doi:10.1080/07357900600705268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain MH, MacVicar GR, Petrylak DP et al (2007) Trastuzumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2/neu-positive urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicenter phase II National Cancer Institute trial. J Clin Oncol 25:2218–2224. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.0994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M et al (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1626–1634. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I et al (2005) Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:2012–2024. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa051918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Kelly WK, Schwartz LH, Heller G (2005) Prostate cancer clinical trial end points: “RECIST”ing a step backwards. Clin Cancer Res 11:5223–5232. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevinc A, Turhal NS (2008) ‘Please, desist RECIST criteria in GIST, at least in me’. Onkologie 31:556. doi:10.1159/000151688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NIH PO1 Grant #5PO1CA109522

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. Galsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galsky, M.D., Zaks, T., Hassani, H. et al. Target-specific randomized discontinuation trial design: a novel approach in molecular therapeutics. Invest New Drugs 28, 194–198 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-009-9239-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-009-9239-3

Keywords

Navigation