Optimal modeling for phase I design of a two drug combination—results of a phase I study of cisplatin with 9-nitrocamptothecin
Combination of platinum with topoisomerase-I inhibitors are synergistic. The objectives of this study were to determine MTD range and toxicity profile of combinations of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) and intravenous cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. Each course was 28 days starting on day 1 with cisplatin, and then 9NC daily for 5 days/week for three weeks. A new two arm crossing design was created: patients in arm 1 were treated with at the single agent recommended dose of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), and increasing doses of 9NC and in arm 2 with the single agent recommended dose of 9NC (1.5 mg/day) and increasing dose of cisplatin. Once a dose limiting toxicity was observed, the dose of the escalated drug was decreased by one level, and the fixed-dose drug was then escalated. A 3 + 3 design was used. Eligibility criteria were standard for a phase I trial. Pharmacokinetics was performed. Eighteen patients were treated on Arm 1, 3 at the crossing level, and 33 on Arm 2. Dose limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal at the crossing dose level. After crossing, prolonged grade 3 thrombocytopenia was the DLT in arm 1, and grade 4 neutropenia in Arm 2. Only one patient with ovarian cancer had a partial remission, and 12 patients had disease stabilization (24% of clinical benefit). A Bayesian optimal dose finding was tested post-facto. The recommended doses for phase II studies by the 3 + 3 design are cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and 9NC 1.25 mg/day and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 9NC 2.0 mg/day. The Bayesian optimal dose finding suggested a different solution, closest to that of the latter dosing which may be less toxic.
KeywordsCamptothecin Phase I Pharmacokinetics Bayesian design Solid tumors
- 1.Bennett CL, Weeks JA, Somerfield MR, Feinglass J, Smith TJ (1999) Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines. Health services research committee of the American society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:3676–3681PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Raymond E, Campone M, Stupp R, Menten J, Chollet P, Lesimple T, Fety-Deporte R, Lacombe D, Paoletti X, Fumoleau P, Group EECS, Brain Tumor Studies G, New Drug Development P (2002) Multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study of RFS2000 (9-nitro-camptothecin) administered orally 5 days a week in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Eur J Cancer 38:1348–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schoffski P, Herr A, Vermorken JB, Van den Brande J, Beijnen JH, Rosing H et al (2002) Clinical phase II study and pharmacological evaluation of rubitecan in non-pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-significant effect of food intake on the bioavailability of the oral camptothecin analogue. Eur J Cancer 38:807–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar